New Blog Host

This morning I switched my host from Movable Type to WordPress.  Welcome long time readers!  I have also opened up the comments and look forward to chatting with any of you who want to make a comment!

Jenny Hatch

Big Hollywood: Boo-Hoo: Gays’ Lachrymose Last Resort in the War Against Mormons


I just read Charles Winecoffs piece on 8: The Mormon Proposition, the trailer for the documentary is above.
I have not watched the movie. But as a faithful mormon, I just thought it was time to share some of my views on homosexuality. The issue of Gay Marriage and the Mormon activism in defense of traditional marriage is supposedly what the movie is about.
But I think the issue goes much deeper than our church members standing up for traditional marriage during a hotly contested political debate.
President Obama has voiced his oposition to gay marriage, yet no one in the gay community is demonstrating or making movies about him and his administration.
I ache for any individual who would think of me and my family as bigots. It pains me to even consider the idea that those in the gay community who felt compelled to make this movie imagine that I spend my days teaching my children to hate.
The gospel of Jesus Christ is a message of love, not hate. Paul and I have spent considerable time and energy teaching, training, and modeling to our children family harmony and love. We have never had a family home evening lesson on “groups of people who we hate.”
We have taught our children to love and accept everyone as a beloved son or daughter of Heavenly Father.
When my oldest daughter quietly shared with me that her best friend had been raised by lesbian mothers, I did not tell her to dump her friend and never associate with her again. I encouarged her to love her friend and embrace her as the beautiful soul that she is.
Numerous times in my life, I have had others reach out to me in friendship. Men and Woman who wanted to spend time with me, associate together in our homes, and have our children spend time together. Yet over and over and over again some of those same wonderful people, upon learning of my religion, dumped me and my family as though we were plagued with leprosy. The prejudice that has manifested in my life because of my religious affiliation is not something I waste too much time worrying about or losing sleep over.
Bigotry against mormons has been a defining characteristic of our faith since its founding. In fact, it seems to be the one great thread that binds us all up together as we faithfully move through life dodging the rocks (sometimes literally) thrown in our direction for our belief in the peculiar notions of the restored gospel of Jesus Christ.
So to say that Mormons are inherently bigoted strikes me as being somewhat funny. We are a people who have been the victims of some of the worst prejudice America could dish up. What other religious group had an extermination order on the books until 1976 in Missouri?
In regards to the practice of homosexuality, I have been a vocal mother in my community speaking out against gay indoctrination in our local schools. Does this make me a hater?
I simply claim the right to teach my moral values to my children, and not be undermined by what is happening in the classrooms of our local public schools.
I have talked to several activists on both sides of this issue in my community. One young gay man came to my home and interviewed me because he was so curious about my outspoken views at a school board meeting. As we talked I tried to help him understand that I did not hate gay people. I simply did not want my children exposed to a form of sexuality that they could hardly understand, and before I felt the were even ready to learn about heterosexuality.
I hoped that our conversation helped to build a bridge, but he called me a few days after the interview and told me in no uncertain terms that I was a hater and a bigot.
The deeper side of the Mormon vs’ Gays issue is tied up in one thing.
Our religion says that Homosexuality is a sin. Period. People who engage in gay sexual behavior are excommunicated and the church has never backed away from that stance. Those who are sexually oriented towards homosexuality are in fact embraced by the church collectively and by individual members based on those individuals own ability to be big hearted.
It is NOT sexual orientation that is punished by the church, its bishops, or the members. All sorts of people have all sorts of sexual orientations. But it is sexual behavior, (including immorality on the part of heterosexuals), that is disciplined by church courts.
I have known and loved several people over the years who found themselves outside of the church for one reason or another. ALL of them have described to me the loving, tender, but firm discipline that deprived them of various blessings tied to membership in the church.
ALL of them gratefully took the time, energy, and effort to repent, make things right, and return back into full membership and full fellowship in the church. Watching these people go through this process of repentance has strengthened my own testimony of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. The Lords way of healing is so tender, so gentle, sometimes painful, but so very very right in the sense that it allows the person to fully heal and purge the evil from their hearts. Miracles are a big part of this healing and I have experienced the perfect love that is embodied in the Atonement of Jesus Christ.
The Savior not only suffered for our sins, he also Atoned for every single trauma and trial that befuddles us during our mortal experience on the earth.
I believe that so many who are drawn to the gay lifestyle were burned and traumetized by certain family situations and relationships. Who am I to say who someone can love, live with, and associate with during life? I understand the pain that is involved in abnormal family relationships and the ebb and pull that plays out in family life when those who abuse and make afraid are in charge of the children.
I have known loving, wonderful gay couples who are raising talented and loving children.
I am not going to step into these peoples lives and shove my worldview and religion on them.
I am going to stand up for traditional marriage in the public sector and promote laws that will enshrine heterosexuality as the best for family life, because when a mother and a father are able to love each other and welcome a family, it is the ideal situation in which to raise children.
As the Lord himself said in Leviticus 18: Abomination and Confusion are the result of sexual sin.
I believe it even goes deeper. I believe that when the souls of men and women are up in heaven waiting to be born, I believe that they plead with Heavenly Father to send them to a family where they will be loved, cherished, and taught the gospel. I believe those souls have the right to be born in a society where they will be nurtured, loved, and raised holistically.
When Father in Heaven wipes a city, nation, or people off the planet, I believe he does it for the sake of the next generation. He has a duty and a responsibility to send those souls to the parents who will love them and keep them safe. If a society is bound up in abortion, infanticide, non-baby producing forms of sexuality, and the neglect and abuse of children is the norm, why would Father send his little ones into that situation?
Those who have taught me my faith since my infancy have pounded into my brain the ideal of Mother/Father married monogamous love being the safest and best for children, and I believe it with all of my heart. Does that mean that a gay or lesbian couple have absolutely nothing to offer as they parent their own children? No. I just feel sorry for the child who is raised without a mother, without a father. I have watched the ache they experience as the “confusion” takes over. I have also observed and experienced the confusion that is present when abnormal sexual behavior is manifest in a family that PRETENDS to be bound up in normal sexual relationships. It is all confusion, dysfunction, insanity, and pain.
What is best, what is ideal? Those are the questions that everyone should ask. God makes it abundantly clear in the scriptues and in his revealed word how he expects us to behave and how he expects us to treat each other. He also provided a way for us to repent and heal when those ideals are not honored in our family life.
It is my testimony and belief that we should all strive for the ideal, in whatever situation and lifestyle we find ourselves living in.
And if we take on the responsibility of loving and caring for a child, we should provide that child with what God has ordained as ideal.
Jenny Hatch
Ben%20in%20Front%20of%20St%20George%20Temple.jpg
The Natural Family BLOG
“Healthy Families Make A Healthy World!”
A%20Mothers%20Journey.jpg
Click on the book Image to get to my Books hosted on Amazon
Click here to subscribe to The Natural Family Blog on Kindle
function fbs_click() {u=location.href;t=document.title;window.open(‘http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=’+encodeURIComponent(u)+’&t=’+encodeURIComponent(t),’sharer’,’toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436′);return false;} html .fb_share_link { padding:2px 0 0 20px; height:16px; background:url(http://b.static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/zAB5S/hash/4273uaqa.gif) no-repeat top left; }<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=&#8221; onclick=”return fbs_click()” target=”_blank” class=”fb_share_link”>Share on Facebook
NEW! Blogger Account for twitter updates and links!

Bookmark and Share

Depopulation Quotes: Eugenists in their own words…

Depopulation? Several Globalists in Their Own Words –

Sometimes it is good to read and ponder the words of the elites when getting ready to vote.

Jenny Hatch
“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind”Theodore Roosevelt
“Malthus has been vindicated; reality is finally catching up with Malthus. The Third World is overpopulated, it’s an economic mess, and there’s no way they could get out of it with this fast-growing population. Our philosophy is: back to the village.”
Dr. Arne Schiotz, World Wildlife Fund Director of Conservation, stated such, ironically, in 1984:
“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine
“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it….”
“Our program in El Salvador didn’t work. The infrastructure was not there to support it. There were just too goddamned many people…. To really reduce population, quickly, you have to pull all the males into the fighting and you have to kill significant numbers of fertile age females….” “The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa, or through disease like the Black Death….”

Thomas Ferguson, State Department Office of Population Affairs
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider – Founder and Secretary, respectively, The Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, pgs 104-105, 1991
“A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people…. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.”
Stanford Professor ” Paul Ehrlich in The Population Bomb


“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”
J. Cousteau, 1991 explorer and UNESCO courier
“I believe that human overpopulation is the fundamental problem on Earth Today” and,
“We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.”

Dave Foreman, Sierra Club and co founder of Earth First!
“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
Mikhail Gorbachev

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
“The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.”
Dr. Henry Kissinger New York Times, Oct. 28, 1973
“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries”.
Dr. Henry Kissinger
“Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac,” and
“The elderly are useless eaters”

Dr. Henry Kissinger
“World population needs to be decreased by 50%”
Dr. Henry Kissinger
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”
David Rockefeller
“War and famine would not do. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved. AIDS is not an efficient killer because it is too slow. My favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world’s population is airborne Ebola (Ebola Reston), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. We’ve got airborne diseases with 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that. You know, the bird flu’s good, too. For everyone who survives, he will have to bury nine”
Dr. Eric Pianka University of Texas evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert, showed solutions for reducing the world’s population to an audience on population control which gave him a standing ovation
“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.”
David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.”
Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER
“In South America, the government of Peru goes door to door pressuring women to be sterilized and they are funded by American tax dollars to do this.”
Mark Earley in The Wrong Kind of Party Christian Post 10/27 2008
“Women in the Netherlands who are deemed by the state to be unfit mothers should be sentenced to take contraception for a prescribed period of two years.”
Marjo Van Dijken (author of the bill in the Netherlands) in the Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/nov/04/humanrights-women
“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”
Anonymously commissioned Georgia Guidestones

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”

Prince Phillip, Queen Elizabeth’s husband, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund/WWF

“Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”

David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club
“The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.”
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes


“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
Obama’s Science czar John P. Holdren: From a book he helped write ‘Ecoscience’
Paul%20and%20Jenny%20Hatch%20Family.jpg
The Natural Family BLOG
“Healthy Families Make A Healthy World!”
A%20Mothers%20Journey.jpg
Click on the book Image to get to my Books hosted on Amazon
Click here to subscribe to The Natural Family Blog on Kindle
function fbs_click() {u=location.href;t=document.title;window.open(‘http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=’+encodeURIComponent(u)+’&t=’+encodeURIComponent(t),’sharer’,’toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436′);return false;} html .fb_share_link { padding:2px 0 0 20px; height:16px; background:url(http://b.static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/zAB5S/hash/4273uaqa.gif) no-repeat top left; }<a href=”http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=&#8221; onclick=”return fbs_click()” target=”_blank” class=”fb_share_link”>Share on Facebook
NEW! Blogger Account for twitter updates and links!

Bookmark and Share

The Bulletin: Gardasil Researcher Drops A Bombshell

Gardasil Researcher Drops A Bombshell
Harper: Controversal Drug Will Do Little To Reduce Cervical Cancer Rates
By Susan Brinkmann, For The Bulletin
Published:
Sunday, October 25, 2009

Dr. Diane Harper, lead researcher in the development of two human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, said the controversial drugs will do little to reduce cervical cancer rates and, even though they’re being recommended for girls as young as nine, there have been no efficacy trials in children under the age of 15.
Dr. Harper, director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research Group at the University of Missouri, made these remarks during an address at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2-4. Although her talk was intended to promote the vaccine, participants said they came away convinced the vaccine should not be received.

“I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all,” said Joan Robinson, Assistant Editor at the Population Research Institute.

Dr. Harper began her remarks by explaining that 70 percent of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment within a year. Within two years, the number climbs to 90 percent. Of the remaining 10 percent of HPV infections, only half will develop into cervical cancer, which leaves little need for the vaccine.

She went on to surprise the audience by stating that the incidence of cervical cancer in the U.S. is already so low that “even if we get the vaccine and continue PAP screening, we will not lower the rate of cervical cancer in the US.”
There will be no decrease in cervical cancer until at least 70 percent of the population is vaccinated, and even then, the decrease will be minimal.

Apparently, conventional treatment and preventative measures are already cutting the cervical cancer rate by four percent a year. At this rate, in 60 years, there will be a 91.4 percent decline just with current treatment. Even if 70 percent of women get the shot and required boosters over the same time period, which is highly unlikely, Harper says Gardasil still could not claim to do as much as traditional care is already doing.

Dr. Harper, who also serves as a consultant to the World Health Organization, further undercut the case for mass vaccination by saying that “four out of five women with cervical cancer are in developing countries.”
Ms. Robinson said she could not help but wonder, “If this is the case, then why vaccinate at all? But from the murmurs of the doctors in the audience, it was apparent that the same thought was occurring to them.”
However, at this point, Dr. Harper dropped an even bigger bombshell on the audience when she announced that, “There have been no efficacy trials in girls under 15 years.”

Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, studied only a small group of girls under 16 who had been vaccinated, but did not follow them long enough to conclude sufficient presence of effective HPV antibodies.

This is not the first time Dr. Harper revealed the fact that Merck never tested Gardasil for safety in young girls. During a 2007 interview with KPC News.com, she said giving the vaccine to girls as young as 11 years-old “is a great big public health experiment.”

At the time, which was at the height of Merck’s controversial drive to have the vaccine mandated in schools, Dr. Harper remained steadfastly opposed to the idea and said she had been trying for months to convince major television and print media about her concerns, “but no one will print it.”

“It is silly to mandate vaccination of 11 to 12 year old girls,” she said at the time. “There also is not enough evidence gathered on side effects to know that safety is not an issue.”

When asked why she was speaking out, she said: “I want to be able to sleep with myself when I go to bed at night.”
Since the drug’s introduction in 2006, the public has been learning many of these facts the hard way. To date, 15,037 girls have officially reported adverse side effects from Gardasil to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). These adverse reactions include Guilliane Barre, lupus, seizures, paralysis, blood clots, brain inflammation and many others. The CDC acknowledges that there have been 44 reported deaths.
Dr. Harper also participated in the research on Glaxo-Smith-Kline’s version of the drug, Cervarix, currently in use in the UK but not yet approved here. Since the government began administering the vaccine to school-aged girls last year, more than 2,000 patients reported some kind of adverse reaction including nausea, dizziness, blurred vision, convulsions, seizures and hyperventilation. Several reported multiple reactions, with 4,602 suspected side-effects recorded in total. The most tragic case involved a 14 year-old girl who dropped dead in the corridor of her school an hour after receiving the vaccination.

The outspoken researcher also weighed in last month on a report published in the Journal of the American Medical Association that raised questions about the safety of the vaccine, saying bluntly: “The rate of serious adverse events is greater than the incidence rate of cervical cancer.”

Ms. Robinson said she respects Dr. Harper’s candor. “I think she’s a scientist, a researcher, and she’s genuine enough a scientist to be open about the risks. I respect that in her.”

However, she failed to make the case for Gardasil. “For me, it was hard to resist the conclusion that Gardasil does almost nothing for the health of American women.”

Jenny Hatch

Women have “Mothers Intuition” for a reason…


Pregnant Women Resist Vaccination, thank goodness Mothers Intuition is kicking in… LADIES, Listen to your heart!
but the message is the same no matter what you hear on television: Take the Vaccine!


For your vaccine damaged childrens viewing pleasure!

This dude has EVERYTHING figured out. Nothing to worry about folks! Anyone who is yelling about vaccines is obviously Dumb and not quite as smart as him. And hey, if HE SAYS it is safe, who are we to question him?
I suppose not everyone who is a vaccine researcher is on the strings of big pharma. I hope this woman has someone watching her back…
Gardasil Researcher Drops A Bombshell

“At the time, which was at the height of Merck’s controversial drive to have the vaccine mandated in schools, Dr. Harper remained steadfastly opposed to the idea and said she had been trying for months to convince major television and print media about her concerns, “but no one will print it.”

“It is silly to mandate vaccination of 11 to 12 year old girls,” she said at the time. “There also is not enough evidence gathered on side effects to know that safety is not an issue.”

When asked why she was speaking out, she said: “I want to be able to sleep with myself when I go to bed at night.”


Alex Jones responds to President Obamas National Emergency:

Drew Zahn, writing for WorldNetDaily, takes issue with Infowars declaring Obamas national emergency amounts to martial law. An article by Kurt Nimmo of InfoWars took the worry a step further, wondering if the White Houses declaration engaged certain measures of the National Emergencies Act, writes Zahn. But even if there really is a plot to manipulate the H1N1 virus scare into enforcing a sweeping expansion of federal power, todays national emergency falls far short of martial law.
http://prisonplanet.tv/
A state of emergency (regardless of the pretext) allows Obama to do a number of things. As Dr. Harold C. Relyea, a specialist in national government with the Congressional Research Service (CRS) of the Library of Congress, has written, when the President formally declares a national emergency, he may seize property, organize and control the means of production, seize commodities, assign military forces abroad, institute martial law, seize and control all transportation and communication, regulate the operation of private enterprise, restrict travel, and, in a variety of ways, control the lives of United States citizens.
Obamas declaration, however, is incidental because the United States has been under a state of emergency since September 14, 2001. Bush extended this emergency (against a bogus terrorist threat) on August 28, 2008.
Will President Obama allow the state of national emergency, first declared by President George W. Bush on 9/14/01 and re-declared seven times, to remain in effect? asked Peter Dale Scott and Dan Hamburg on February 10, 2009.
On September 10 of this year, Obama reinstituted the national State of Emergency.
Ben%20soon%20after%20the%20birth.jpg
Benjamin Johnson Hatch – 2 hours old after being born at home into his Fathers hands. I did my own prenatal care, birthed him after a six hour labor of love, and he was born Lotus style (we did not cut the cord) and let it fall off naturally six days after his birth. October 25th, 2002
Email
Click on the image to get to the Natural Family BLOG
function fbs_click() {u=location.href;t=document.title;window.open(‘http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=’+encodeURIComponent(u)+’&t=’+encodeURIComponent(t),’sharer’,’toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436′);return false;} html .fb_share_link { padding:2px 0 0 20px; height:16px; background:url(http://b.static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/zAB5S/hash/4273uaqa.gif) no-repeat top left; }<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=&#8221; onclick=”return fbs_click()” target=”_blank” class=”fb_share_link”>Share on Facebook
NEW! Blogger Account for twitter updates and links!

Bookmark and Share