Infant Mortality Rates by ranking
Infant Mortality Rates by ranking
Senator Joan Heckaman
322 Second Avenue North
New Rockford, ND 58356-1712
701-947-2106 E-mail: jheckaman@nd.gov
Dear Senator Heckaman,
I was asked by Paulette Efimenko to send the following information to you to
present to the committee before this bill comes to a vote.
Regarding Senate Bill 2377 laypeople<
Listed below is the
Infant Mortality Rates by ranking
The medically dominated US maternity care system has ranked us 40th in the world.
At twelfth in the nation in 2006, North Dakota's Infant Mortality Rate, 5.6
per 1,000 live births, was still higher than 33 countries in the world.
http://www.unitedhealthfoundation.org/ahr2006/components/infantmortality.html
What the medical community doesn’t understand is that obstetricians and most
physicians are overqualified to attend normal birth.
Having an obstetrical/medical monopoly on maternity care does not produce
the best outcomes.
While the US has the highest infant mortality rate in the developed world,
we also have the highest costs. Spending money routinely medicalizing
pregnancy and birth increases the cost but does not improve the outcomes.
See “Expecting Trouble: the Myth of Prenatal Care in America” by Thomas H.
Strong Jr. MD, neonatologist and obstetrician, Prescott, Arizona.
“The Farmer and the Obstetrician” by Michel Odent, MD, director, The Primal
Health Research Centre, London.
“The Truth about Diet and Drugs in Pregnancy” by Thomas H. Brewer, MD,
co-founder, Blue Ribbon Babies.
Our ‘fee for service’ system rewards poor outcomes while financially
penalizing good outcomes.
A farmer would go broke if he treated his animals obstetrically instead of
providing them with the things that actually do create good outcomes: enough
good food, clean air and water, a safe environment, shelter, privacy for
birth and lactation.
There are no requirements that the above issues are ever incorporated in the
usual course of medical prenatal, birth, neonatal or postpartum care. This
information is not even in the curriculum of the Medical School at UND. What
is the problem that requires a solution? Who is threatened by the precious
few midwives who attend several dozen births a year in North Dakota?
Midwives have served their communities since before North Dakota was a state. Why do
some fine it necessary to criminalize their contributions to safer birth and
healthier children and families? If anyone finds out why doctors and
hospitals want a monopoly on birth, please let me know.
The time, attention and effort of medical professionals who are of the
opinion that homebirth is not safe, would be much better used to improve
maternal and infant health statistics for babies born in hospitals. A good
reference for them to use is “The Impact of Birthing Practices on
Breastfeeding: Protecting the Mother and Baby Continuum” by Mary Kroeger,
BSN, CNM, MPH with Linda J. Smith, BSE, FACCE, IBCLC. (Jones and Bartlett,
Pub.)
I also believe this bill is redundant. It is already against the law to
practice medicine without a license. Why do we need a separate law to
prevent people who are not doctors from practicing obstetrics? Midwives do
not ‘practice obstetrics’ they attend births. Most midwives don’t even claim
to deliver babies. The mothers deliver their own babies and the midwife is
in attendance.
Perhaps this bill is a restraint of trade issue. A consortium of medical
professionals is attempting to influence the law in order to increase their
market share. I do not believe this is how our legislative process should be
used.
Sincerely,
–Jody–
~Jody McLaughlin – Compleat Mother
Category Birthweight
My Triplets Were Inseparable, Whatever the Risks
My Triplets Were Inseparable, Whatever the Risks
“FOR the first month, their bedroom, with all the wires and machines, would look more like an extension of the intensive care unit than a home nursery. Endless visits to the pediatrician, ophthalmologist, cardiologist, gastroenterologist and neurologist would fill the boys’ first calendar year.
But with a good insurance plan and Medicaid’s coverage for babies under 2 pounds 10 ounces, we were relieved that we did not have to pay the million-dollar hospital bill. This was not the time to pontificate on how our quest to have a family resulted in a significant financial drain on society’s resources, though that knowledge has weighed on me.
What hasn’t weighed on me, as our boys have grown healthier and bigger (they’re now 4 and thriving in preschool) is our decision not to reduce. I often look at them and ask myself that impossible question: Which one wouldn’t be here?
But I feel no righteousness about our choice, only luck. Time and again I run into mothers at the playground with twins who notice my triplets (it’s hard not to) and gently ask whether I faced that decision, only to then confess their deep guilt at having reduced from triplets themselves.
“Look, don’t,” I tell them. “We could have lost all of ours. We almost did.”
Almost.”
Susanne M. Sanchez lives in Hollywood, Fla.
I appreciate Mrs. Sanchez’s insights and story. Yet I have to think about the story of the mother who gave birth to triplets that is outlined in the Book Having Twins by Elizabeth Noble
The mother in that story used midwives and had a home birth. Every night her husband would pack her some fruit and turkey by her bed, and she ate and ate and ate the Brewer diet, which is basically a 170 gram protein a day diet, for each additional baby you add 20 grams of protein and 500 calories for higher order multiples. The mother in that story carried her three babies to term and gave birth to them at home.
I would challenge any mother reading this to seriously consider investing in the Noble twins book and start now, before you even get pregnant, to train your body to digest all that protein. It takes time and the wrong time to start is when you are six weeks pregnant, however, any efforts that can be made to increase calories and protein will help those babies.
Jenny Hatch
Birthsong: Maya I Johansen: Homebirth & Unassisted Birth
“It is often said that women who give birth at home are selfish, and do not care for the well-being of their little ones. This is so far from the truth. Hospitals are in many instances dangerous for healthy babies. Hospitals are a place for the sick, and germs and bacteria are often transfered to the newborn.
Drugs given to the mother cross the placenta, and cause distress in the baby, and the health risk increases with each hospital procedure that is performed, not to mention psychological trauma from painful medical procedures. Babies born at home are usually more alert and ready to interact and bond.
Their minds are still open as they have been handled gently and lovingly. Often babies who have experienced a great deal of trauma will literally withdraw into themselves.(6) Mothers who have given birth at home are in an optimal state to greet their babies because of the natural “high” from endorphins and the hormone oxytocin.
These hormones are an important part of producing nurturing feelings. I believe this is an important part of forming the loving mother child relationship, and it helps a women get off to the right start in nursing and caring for her little one.(7) Sadly, this is overlooked by the medical profession. Doctors and nurses whisk babies away from their mothers when they need their mothers the most, and at a time when they are most alert and ready to interact.”
This article is an excellent introduction to Unassisted Childbirth, contains many links, and even has a quote from an online article by Shel Franco that mentions my fourth birth story!
I highly recomend pregnant women taking the time to read this article and surf around to the various sites, books, and videos mentioned.
Birth Testimony by Amanda Terfansky Counter speaking at the 2nd International Husband/Wife Home Birth Conference
Jenny Hatch
Tiny Baby to Leave Florida Hospital

This image is being blasted across the Media as the fullness of American Technology and Medical Innovation. I believe it is an image that should be pounded into the minds of parents everywhere as the absolute failure of the Medical Profession and American Society to teach and educate new mothers with the facts of prenatal nutrition.
What a sad and pathetic way to enter the world….
Tiny Baby to Leave Florida Hospital
“MIAMI (AP) —
A premature baby that doctors say spent less time in the womb than any other surviving infant is to be released from a Florida hospital Tuesday.
Amillia Sonja Taylor was just 9 1/2 inches long and weighed less than 10 ounces when she was born Oct. 24. She was delivered 21 weeks and six days after conception. Full-term births come after 37 to 40 weeks.
“We weren’t too optimistic,” Dr. William Smalling said Monday. “But she proved us all wrong.”
Neonatologists who cared for Amillia say she is the first baby known to survive after a gestation period of fewer than 23 weeks. A database run by the University of Iowa’s Department of Pediatrics lists seven babies born at 23 weeks between 1994 and 2003.
Amillia has experienced respiratory problems, a very mild brain hemorrhage and some digestive problems, but none of the health concerns are expected to pose long-term problems, her doctors said.
“We can deal with lungs and things like that but, of course, the brain is the most important,” Dr. Paul Fassbach said Monday. “But her prognosis is excellent.”
Amillia has been in an incubator since birth and has been receiving oxygen. She will continue getting a small amount of oxygen, and her breathing will be monitored once she leaves Baptist Children’s Hospital. She now is between 25 and 26 inches long and weighs 4 1/2 pounds.
“She’s going to be in a normal crib, she’s going to have normal feedings, she’s taking all her feedings from a bottle,” Smalling said.
Amillia is the first child for Eddie and Sonja Taylor of Homestead. She was conceived by in vitro fertilization, which made it possible to pinpoint her exact time in the womb, and was delivered by Caesarean section.”
No one ever talks about the costs of all this abomination, not to mention the long term consequences for this child from her months of torture in the NICU.
I’m looking forward to the day when the woman in America who has the healthiest full term and most beautiful baby is heralded for her amazing contribution to our society. Instead what is blasted from sea to shining sea is the wonder of this little person being kept alive for months outside of the womb..
And I have no doubt in my mind that C-section was performed because Momma had toxemia, a completely preventable malnutrition state for the mother marked by protein deficiency and dehydration.
WATER, SALT, PROTEIN, WATER, SALT, PROTEIN, WATER, SALT, PROTEIN, come on… say it out loud. “WATER, SALT, PROTEIN, WATER, SALT, PROTEIN….these are the keys to healthy pregnancy.”
Jenny Hatch
Amanda Terfansky Counter Speaking at the 2nd International Husband/Wife Homebirth Conference
Amanda Counter Speaking at the 2nd International Husband/Wife Homebirth Conference in 2001.
This conference was held in July of 2001. Amanda was one of the parents who spoke at this conference dedicated to husband and wife home childbirth.
No Professionals were allowed to attend.
If you would like to purchase the E-Video, Please go here.
If you would like to purchase the transcript to the conference, Please go here.
Jenny Hatch
