On this Sunday edition of the Alex Jones Show, Alex talks with Deborah Cohen, the features editor of the British Medical Journal, an international peer reviewed medical journal. Ms. Cohen co-authored WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies,” an article covering scientists advising the World Health Organization on planning for an influenza pandemic who had done paid work for pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were preparing.
Key scientists advising the World Health Organization on planningfor an influenza pandemic had done paid work for pharmaceuticalfirms that stood to gain from the guidance they were preparing.These conflicts of interest have never been publicly disclosedby WHO, and WHO has dismissed inquiries into its handling ofthe A/H1N1 pandemic as “conspiracy theories.” Deborah Cohenand Philip Carter investigate
“Next week marks the first anniversary of the official declarationof the influenza A/H1N1 pandemic. On 11 June 2009 Dr MargaretChan, the director general of the World Health Organization,announced to the world’s media: “I have conferred withleading influenza experts, virologists, and public health officials.In line with procedures set out in the International HealthRegulations, I have sought guidance and advice from an EmergencyCommittee established for this purpose. On the basis of availableevidence, and these expert assessments of the evidence, thescientific criteria for an influenza pandemic have been met…Theworld is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.”
It was the culmination of 10 years of pandemic preparednessplanning for WHO—years of committee meetings with expertsflown in from around the world and reams of draft documentsoffering guidance to governments. But one year on, governmentsthat took advice from WHO are unwinding their vaccine contracts,and billions of dollars’ worth of stockpiled oseltamivir(Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza)—bought from health budgetsalready under tight constraints—lie unused in warehousesaround the world.
A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of InvestigativeJournalism has uncovered evidence that raises troubling questionsabout how WHO managed conflicts of interest among the scientistswho advised its pandemic planning, and about the transparencyof the science underlying its advice to governments. Was itappropriate for WHO to take advice from experts who had declarablefinancial and research ties with pharmaceutical companies producingantivirals and influenza vaccines? Why was key WHO guidanceauthored by an influenza expert who had received payment forother work from Roche, manufacturers of oseltamivir, and GlaxoSmithKline,manufacturers of zanamivir? And why does the composition ofthe emergency committee from which Chan sought guidance remaina secret known only to those within WHO? We are left wonderingwhether major public health organisations are able to effectivelymanage the conflicts of interest that are inherent in medical science.
Already WHO’s handling of the pandemic has led to an unprecedented number of reviews and inquiries by organisations including theCouncil of Europe, European Parliament, and WHO itself, followingallegations of industry influence. Dr Chan has dismissed theseas “conspiracies,” and earlier this year, during a speech atthe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, shesaid: “WHO anticipated close scrutiny of its decisions, butwe did not anticipate that we would be accused, by some Europeanpoliticians, of having declared a fake pandemic on the adviceof experts with ties to the pharmaceutical industry and somethingpersonal to gain from increased industry profits.”
The inquiry by British MP Paul Flynn for the Council of EuropeParliamentary Assembly—due to be published today—willbe critical. It will say that decision making around the A/H1N1crisis has been lacking in transparency. “Some of the outcomesof the pandemic, as illustrated in this report, have been dramatic:distortion of priorities of public health services all overEurope, waste of huge sums of public money, provocation of unjustifiedfear amongst Europeans, creation of health risks through vaccinesand medications which might not have been sufficiently testedbefore being authorised in fast-track procedures, are all examplesof these outcomes. These results need to be critically examinedby public health authorities at all levels with a view to rebuildingpublic confidence in their decisions.”
The investigation by the BMJ/The Bureau reveals a system strugglingto manage the inherent conflict between the pharmaceutical industry,WHO, and the global public health system, which all draw onthe same pool of scientific experts. Our investigation has identifiedkey scientists involved in WHO pandemic planning who had declarableinterests, some of whom are or have been funded by pharmaceuticalfirms that stood to gain from the guidance they were drafting.Yet these interests have never been publicly disclosed by WHOand, despite repeated requests from the BMJ/The Bureau, WHOhas failed to provide any details about whether such conflictswere declared by the relevant experts and what, if anything,was done about them.”
…Professor Mintzes does not agree with WHO’s explanationthat secrecy was needed to protect against the influence ofoutside interest on decision making. “I can’t understandwhy the WHO kept this secret. It should be public in terms ofaccountability like the expert advisory committees. If the rationaleof secret membership is not to be unduly influenced, there areother ways of dealing with this through strong conflict of interestprovisions,” she said.
She also believes that the very nature of allowing a triggerpoint for vaccine contracts opens the system up unnecessarilyto exploitation. “It seems a problem that this declaration mighttrigger contracts to be realised. There should be safeguardsin place to make sure those with an interest in vaccine manufacturerscan’t exploit the situation. The WHO will have to looklong and hard at this in future,” she said.
The number of victims of H1N1 fell far short of even the moreconservative predictions by the WHO. It could, of course, havebeen far worse.. Planning for the worst while hoping for thebest remains a sensible approach. But our investigation hasrevealed damaging issues. If these are not addressed, H1N1 mayyet claim its biggest victim—the credibility of the WHOand the trust in the global public health system.”
“People worldwide now realize there is something foul brewing in the H1N1 swine flu vaccines, government prescribed drugs, and the mass media manufactured “emergency.” Iguarantee H1N1 will not kill you. What can and probably will if you don’t take this warning seriously, and act on it, is DEATH BY TOXIC SHOCK, resulting from an overwhelmed immune system, thanks to a combination of chemical and biological assaults, officials’ malfeasance, and gross criminal neglect of the deadliest, most common, naturally-remedied killer–the “cytokine storm.”
Since the normal seasonal flu is about 94% more deadly than the current H1N1 pandemic, it is not likely to kill you or especially healthy children and teens. So why are young people with most solid immune systems said to be most vulnerable to death from the “pandemic” flu?
Fueled by the imposed geopolitics and economics that triggered World War I, the 1918 Spanish Flu is estimated to have killed between 50-100 million people. Mostly young healthy victims, experts say, were vulnerable, as they are today, attributable to immune system hyper-stimulation called the cytokine storm.
Cytokines are blood messengers that act like hormones in your body enabling cells to communicate. Every cell is intelligent and knows what it needs to sustain itself. It does so by sending messages within and around itself to regulate everything much like your heartbeat is regulated by adrenalin and other chemicals that operate bio-energetically, passing messages electro-magnetically and bio-acoustically.
This life-sustaining system is naturally tuned like an orchestra by each hormone, cytokine, or “instrument” playing an important part in the symphony of your “living temple.” If one or more of these music makers suddenly decides to play solo, raising its volume unnaturally, or if suddenly a thousand trumpets were injected into the brass section, then every other instrument has to compensate by likewise playing, even screaming, louder to be heard. The noise becomes stressful and unbearable to the audience.”
Last september I went to the park with my friends and while our children played, three of us sat talking about the H1N1 Vaccine and what we planned to do for our families. One friend had scheduled her 3 year old daughter for the vaccine later that week, and another friend, who was pregnant with her third child, shared how much her OB had been pressuring her to get the shot.
She told us about her sister who was a nurse. The sister had received the regular Flu Vaccine and almost died. She told her doctor how reluctant she was to get a vaccine while she was pregnant and he stopped pressuring her when he heard the story about her sister’s experience with the regular flu vaccine. He said that with her “family background” of problems around the flu shot, perhaps she should forgo getting the shot. So she did. She gave birth to a beautiful baby girl a few weeks ago.
I told my friends that I had been conducting quite a bit of research, simply because I felt the hype around this vaccine “pandemic” was so over the top nuts, it just felt like something was off. My friends know that we have never vaccinated our children, but were curious to know if we planned to get the h1N1 because the new virus was obviously so much more “dangerous and deadly” according to the media. I told my friends that we would NOT be getting the vaccine, and that I was prepared to go to jail in order to protect my children. My friend with the 3 year old daughter said she was going to cancel her appointment. I also told my friends about an article I had read the night before that made the case that the h1n1 vaccine had elements in it that would cause sterility.
The article Squalene: Be Very Afraid part 2 by Rima E. Laibow MD made the case that “Swine flu” vaccine has adjuvants that impair fertility, Making people infertile is part of eugenics, thus genocide.
She also said,
“The plan to use this fertility-impairing adjuvant in the “swine flu” vaccine against a flu that has so far been far less irksome than the ordinary seasonal flu underscores concerns that this H1N1 mass vaccination programme mandated by WHO with the support of pharma companies such as Baxter is designed primarily to cause death and injury, and so significantly reduce the global population.”
In the article Dr. Laibow also quoted Gary Matsumoto from his book Vaccine A The Covert Government Experiment That’s Killing our Soldiers and Why GI’s are Only the First Victims, Kapitola 3. “The Greatest Story Never Told”
“Dr. Jules Freund creator of this oil-based adjuvant warned in 1956 that animals injected with his formulation developed terrible, incurable conditions: allergic aspermatogenesis (stoppage of sperm production), experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (the animal version of MS), allergic neuritis (inflammation of the nerves that can lead to paralysis) and other severe autoimmune disorders.”
From that day in September to today, I have continued to research, study, pray, think, listen, and write about this topic. Was it possible an agenda to reduce the population with vaccines has played out the past year in America and the world at large?
A few months ago I heard about a woman name Eileen Dannemann who was collecting the stories of Mothers who had miscarried after getting the shot. The other day I had the honor of interviewing Eileen on the radio. Since she first put out the word on her Progressive Convergence Web Site asking for documented stories from mothers themselves, she has since put together a database of stories: Progressive Convergence Miscarriage Cases on her website.
During the interview she told me about 70 anecdotal miscarriage stories, she said she had received about 20 phone calls from Mothers sharing stories directly with her. And she also has data from VAERS, the Vaccine reporting system, set up by the government, and they have over 150, altogether over 200 miscarriages and these miscarriages happened during all three trimesters, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. Many in the first trimester. These ladies were actually forced to get this h1n1 vaccine. She said, “I had nurses say that they had doctors tell them that you can kill yourselves or you can kill your babies if they don’t get this vaccine.”
She also said, “The h1n1 virus was being blamed for the deaths of 27 pregnant women, so we’ve been researching that as well. It turns out that these quote unquote 27 women, you know, they didn’t do any, for most of them, they didn’t do any reliable test that they had h1n1, it was just empirical and other things that are not actually credible. The CDC appears to be allowed to put out incredible information, without substance, but yet, when we show them that these two hundred and more women had miscarriages maybe two weeks later after the h1n1, but the sonograms showed that the babies miscarried an hour, a day, a week after the vaccine.”
It was an honor to talk to Eileen and I would encourage anyone interested in this topic to take a few minutes to check out the links tied to this article. Eileen thinks it was the Thimerisol in the vaccine that caused these deaths and she does not believe that any squalene was in the American h1n1 vaccines. Yet a simple test to check for squalene antibodies in the blood of those mothers who miscarried might provide the clues necessary to see what was the source of the deaths of these fetuses. The anti-squalene antibody test could confirm whether or not squalene was in the h1n1 vaccines given to pregnant American women over the past six months.
Hair Analysis has also been shown to be very effective in showing the mercury levels in the body, more effective than a urine test. If mothers were given enough mercury to cause a spontaneous abortion, doubtless they still have high toxicity levels of mercury in the body. Parents who want to know the truth should seek out these tests to prove that toxicity was a factor in the death of their child. During the coming years, if mothers and fathers are having a difficult time getting pregnant, they should have these tests done to see if they were indeed poisoned with Squalene and Mercury while receiving the h1n1 vaccine.
I am so grateful that the American People and their doctors refused to take and/or administer this toxic brew in such high numbers these past few months. The amount of vaccine left over is indicative of just how many people refused to role up their sleeves. While the damage to those who submitted to the shot is great, especially for those parents who lost a child, if parents will take the time to share their stories, they can help prevent another couples loss in the future, and perhaps help shut down the Government Vaccine Programs altogether.
Please contact Eileen Dannemann at ncowmail@gmail.com to share your story. Legally you cannot sue anyone for damages because of laws set in place before the pandemic was rolled out by the pharma companies, the CDC, and the World Health Organization.
“Geneva – World Health Organisation chief Margaret Chan on Thursday decided to maintain a pandemic flu alert nearly a year after she placed the world on maximum alert for the new swine flu virus.
The WHO said following advice from a panel of scientists that although the pandemic had declined, cases of A(H1N1) influenza expected to continue in the coming weeks mainly during the southern hemisphere’s flu season.”
The question I would like to ask President Obama is, “where do you stand on the question of Population Reducing Vaccines? And when you wrote the piece in the New York Times back in June of 2005 titled Grounding A Pandemic with Richard Lugar, were you just concerned about peoples health, or did you have a financial and ideological stake in the outcome of this legislation being passed?
“It is essential for the international community, led by the United States, to take decisive action to prevent a pandemic.
So what should we do? Recently, the World Health Organization called for more money and attention to be devoted to effective preventive action, appealing for $100 million.
Congress responded promptly. A bipartisan group of senators obtained $25 million for prevention efforts (a quarter of the request, the traditional contribution of the United States), allowing the C.D.C., the Agency for International Development, the Health and Human Services Department and other agencies to improve their ability to act.”
OK, so the whole world has watched all of you act, and act, and act… and today we were informed that the pandemic alert will be maintained at level six. Articles have been written, movies and news reports have been made, lives have been permanently altered, and potentially millions of peoples health has been ruined, and/or lives ended. My final question Mr. Obama is how much money did you make on your stock purchase from Baxter over the past five years and how dare your wife lecture the American People on health issues like obesity while the biggest health fraud of the past hundred years plays out and you and your administration are up to your elbows in the whole scandal?
