I may even decide to beat them a third time – Donald Trump talking about the democrats in 2024. I see him all the time but I still miss him on the world stage. Simply awesome! pic.twitter.com/KjkQgpJ0ZS
It was great to have @CPAC in my home state of Florida. I truly enjoyed being surrounded by my fellow conservatives as we unite around our shared principles.
Like Ronald Reagan once said, I believe it’s a time for choosing again. I believe we face our greatest enemy and how we respond will decide if freedom survives. I’m running because the solution is a wave of lions kicking liars out of office in 2022. This is my @CPAC speech. 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/plcIs9ImS6
An absolute honor to intro the legendary Bo Snerdley who reminisced about Rush’s incredibly important legacy and the depth of respect he had from the beginning for @JamesOKeefeIII@project_veritas muckraking brand of “truth to power” journalism.
Click here to download a pdf file of this release.
Vaccine Companies Conceal mRNA Genetic Safety Science from Consumers and Regulators
Las Vegas, NV (MedicalVeritas.org)—Pfizer
and Moderna companies, along with vaccine distributor, Henry Schein, Inc., have filed to hide discovery of mRNA genetic safety risks in favor of billions made in governmental sales according to a federal lawsuit brought by whistleblower and former AIDS science Schein advisor, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz.
Horowitz claims the companies are guilty of unfair competition and deceptive advertising risking civilization’s extinction through vaccine-induced viral mutations.
Multiple mutants are now emerging globally as accurately predicted by the doctor in the wake of the defendants’ “novel” mRNA vaccines. The first mutants were reported less than two weeks after Pfizer’s mass vaccination campaign began in the UK.
These “genetic therapies” deliver their “payloads” by multiplying massive numbers of AIDS-science-discovered spike proteins, the doctor’s lawsuit explains. The manufactured “antigens” attach to human cells like keys unlocking the door to DNA function. The corrupted DNA then makes more of the same key entry-proteins.
These spike protein poisons, evidenced to deliver AIDS virus genes, are now spreading throughout populations to allegedly produce protective antibodies and ‘herd immunity.’ But at the same time the genetic-poisons’ shed from vaccinated people, merge with other transmissible viruses in them, and are expected to worsen risks of mutating and multiplying the pandemic through such actions.
On February 21, 2021, a new mutant reportedly emerged in Russia combining the coronavirus with the avian flu, H5N8.
“This indicates the risk to civilization is skyrocketing,” Horowitz said. “As vaccinated people shed or spread the airborne viral antigens these genetic risks will merge with other viruses, such as herpes, H5N1, or even Ebola. That will ‘hyper-weaponize’ an increasing number of more deadly strains.”
The South African strain contains just such a spike protein. This mutation has been reported to be more deadly.
Meanwhile, the doctor alleges, the companies have not only “neglected crucial genetic safety studies and falsely advertised their vaccines as “safe,” but Pfizer and Moderna have filed in federal court to block such discovery altogether.
“Vaccination hesitancy” may actually be preventing such corporate-imposed risks to humanity,” Dr. Horowitz explained. “As these companies spend fortunes, delay discoveries, conceal risks, and neglect here and elsewhere important science, vaccination hesitancy increases contrary to officials’ intentions.”
Aside from the genetic safety concerns raised by Horowitz, the efficacy of the Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA products has been solidly debunked by the associate editor of the British Medical Journal, Peter Doshi, in two hotly-contested articles.
According to Amazon and Wikipedia, Horowitz is a Harvard-trained public health expert who authored the best-selling book in the field of AIDS and communicable diseases, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola—Nature, Accident or Intentional?He is also an award-winning filmmaker and pioneer of the competing anti-viral and vaccine alternative branded OxySilverTM—a NASA science advancement. He was subsequently smeared, censored, and deprived of his career in professional education and humanitarian medicine.
Viewed as a pharmaceutical industry competitor, Dr. Horowitz filed this lawsuit after discovering the defendants had planned to profit from the pandemic. They then co-advertised their vaccines as “safe” while neglecting and knowingly concealing genetic risks. Schein had similarly concealed AIDS science when Horowitz advised them. He objected to their officials’ alleged cover-up and was fired.
The questionable mRNA vaccines were approved by the FDA despite 23% of expert commissioners voting against cerification.
As a vaccine risk analyst and industry competitor, the doctor argues that the FDA violated its Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”) requirements and the public’s trust.
“The ‘fast-tracked’ vaccines breached the EUA because alternatives, such as anti-oxidants, including OxySilverTM , were available but purposely dismissed. Much like hydroxychloroquine, OxySilverTM was neglected or unfairly rejected, and maliciously maligned,” the doctor explained.
“These are monopolistic practices,” Horowitz said. “They are illegal. ‘Regulatory capture’ by these drug companies best explains the FDA’s malfeasance.”
Defendants Pfizer, Moderna and Schein filed with federal case magistrate, Nicholas P. Mizell, that they intend to deliver motions to stay discovery of the genetic science requested by Horowitz, pending a motion to dismiss the case to conceal the evidence and their liability foreever.
If the enterprise’s motions are granted, the urgent information will remain hidden, and irreparable harm to society will compound according to Dr. Horowitz’s complaint.
“The company has created a board that can overrule even Mark Zuckerberg. Soon it will decide whether to allow Trump back on Facebook.”
“On a morning in May, 2019, forty-three lawyers, academics, and media experts gathered in the windowless basement of the NoMad New York hotel for a private meeting. The room was laid out a bit like a technologist’s wedding, with a nametag and an iPad at each seat, and large succulents as centerpieces. There were also party favors: Facebook-branded notebooks and pens. The company had convened the group to discuss the Oversight Board, a sort of private Supreme Court that it was creating to help govern speech on its platforms. The participants had all signed nondisclosure agreements. I sneaked in late and settled near the front. “Clap if you can hear me,” the moderator, a woman dressed in a black jumpsuit, said.”
“…Board members found out that they were getting the case only a half hour before the public did. Members eagerly watched the board’s internal Web site to see if they had been selected for the panel. They will now have two more months to deliberate it. Civil-society groups like the Center for Democracy & Technology and R Street, a conservative think tank, are submitting comments on the case—the equivalent of filing amicus briefs—arguing for or against Trump’s reinstatement. Trump has the opportunity to submit a brief arguing why he should be reinstated. “The board’s Trump decision may affect the liberties and, yes, lives of hundreds of millions,” Samples told me. “Few U.S. Supreme Court cases ever hold such potential for good or for ill.” Ronaldo Lemos, a board member and law professor in Rio de Janeiro, told me that he believes the board has a lot of work ahead. “The Oversight Board is not going away anytime soon,” he said. “We’re not going anywhere.”
I shared my thoughts on the piece in the tweets below.
