Canadian Doctor Defies Gag Order – Tells Public How Moderna COVID Shots Killed and Disabled Patients

I am so amazed by the brave doctors who are risking EVERYTHING to get the truth out. And the indie journalists who are documenting their claims. Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson interviews Dr. Charles Hoffe.

Jenny Marie Hatch

Contact me if you have a Covid Vaccine story to tell…

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Charles Hoffe has been a medical doctor for 28 years in the small, rural town of Lytton in British Columbia, Canada. The town is comprised of many indigenous groups and the “First Nations.”

When Dr. Hoffe was given 900 doses of the Moderna experimental COVID-19 injections, he administered the doses through the Lytton Medical Clinic to those who wanted them.

He chose not to inject himself.

Dr. Hoffe reports that the result of injecting 900 people among the indigenous First Nations community was that 2 people went into anaphylactic shock, one person died, and several others have suffered what appear to be permanent disabilities. He relates how one of his patients is in so much pain now, that she prefers death to life.

By contrast, no one in the community died or became permanently disabled due to the COVID-19 virus for the past year.

Dr. Hoffe reported these adverse reactions by email to the medical personnel in his community who were responsible for the roll-out of the Moderna shots, which included pharmacists, nurses, and doctors in his area, a total of about 18 people he says.

His email expressed grave concern over the side effects he was seeing, and he asked if perhaps they should pause the injections for a while.

He reports that within 48 hours he received a very stern rebuke from his superiors at the Interior Health Authority accusing him of causing “vaccine hesitancy” and that they were going to report him to BC College of Physicians and Surgeons.

They forbade him from saying anything negative about the Moderna shots by issuing a gag order against him.

Dr. Hoffe explains that this is a method of intimidation that is being used against other doctors who have become too afraid to speak out, because the College of Physicians and Surgeons has great authority to shut down doctors’ careers, or heavily fine them.

As he continued to see more injuries the following week, he became very angry about his gag order. He was told that if he had any concerns about the injections that he had to contact the medical health officer in charge of the Moderna roll out.

He did, but when he did not receive a reply, he decided to write an open letter directly to Dr. Bonnie Henry, British Columbia Provincial Health Officer, in direct defiance of his gag order since he made it public.

Here is a copy of the letter.

Dr. Charles D. Hoffe, BSc, MB, BCh, LMCC
Lytton Medical Clinic
Lytton BC V0K 1Z0

5 April, 2021

Dr. Bonnie Henry,
British Columbia Provincial Health Officer
Ministry of Health
1515 Blanchard Street
Victoria, BC, V8W 3C9

Dear Dr. Henry,

The first dose of the Moderna vaccine has now been administered to some of my patients in the community of Lytton, BC. This began with the First Nations members of our community in mid-January, 2021. 900 doses have now been administered.

I have been quite alarmed at the high rate of serious side-effects from this novel treatment.
From this relatively small number of people vaccinated so far, we have had:

  1. Numerous allergic reactions, with two cases of anaphylaxis.
  2. One (presumed) vaccine induced sudden death, (in a 72 year old patient with COPD. This patient complained of being more short of breath continually after receiving the vaccine, and died very suddenly and unexpectedly on day 24, after the vaccine. He had no history of cardiovascular disease).
  3. Three people with ongoing and disabling neurological deficits, with associated chronic pain, persisting for more than 10 weeks after their first vaccine. These neurological deficits include: continual and disabling dizziness, generalised or localized neuromuscular weakness, with or without sensory loss. The chronic pain in these patients is either generalised or regional, with or without headaches.

So in short, in our small community of Lytton, BC, we have one person dead, and three people who look as though they will be permanently disabled, following their first dose of the Moderna vaccine. The age of those affected ranges from 38 to 82 years of age.

So I have a couple of questions and comments:

  1. Are these considered normal and acceptable long term side-effects for gene modification therapy? Judging by medical reports from around the world, our Lytton experience is not unusual.
  2. Do you have any idea what disease processes may have been initiated, to be producing these ongoing neurological symptoms?
  3. Do you have any suggestions as to how I should treat the vaccine induced neurological weakness, the dizziness, the sensory loss, and the chronic pain syndromes in these people, or should they be all simply referred to a neurologist? I anticipate that many more will follow, as the vaccine is rolled out. This was only phase one, and the first dose.
  4. In stark contrast to the deleterious effects of this vaccine in our community, we have not had to give any medical care what-so-ever, to anyone with Covid-19. So in our limited experience, this vaccine is quite clearly more dangerous than Covid-19.
  5. I realize that every medical therapy has a risk-benefit ratio, and that serious disease calls for serious medicine. But we now know that the recovery rate of Covid-19, is similar to the seasonal flu, in every age category. Furthermore, it is well known that the side effects following a second shot, are significantly worse than the first. So the worst is still to come.
  6. It must be emphasised, that these people were not sick people, being treated for some devastating disease. These were previously healthy people, who were offered an experimental therapy, with unknown long-term side-effects, to protect them against an illness that has the same mortality rate as the flu. Sadly, their lives have now been ruined.
  7. It is normally considered a fundamental principal of medical ethics, to discontinue a clinical trial if significant harm is demonstrated from the treatment under investigation.
  8. So my last question is this: Is it medically ethical to continue this vaccine rollout, in view of the severity of these life altering side-effects, after just the first shot? In Lytton, BC, we have an incidence of 1 in 225 of severe life altering side-effects, from this experimental gene modification therapy.

I have also noticed that these vaccine induced side effects are going almost entirely unreported, by those responsible for the vaccine rollout. I am aware that this is often a problem, with vaccines in general, and that delayed side-effects after vaccines, are sometimes labelled as being “coincidences”, as causality is often hard to prove. However, in view of the fact that this is an experimental treatment, with no long-term safety data, I think that perhaps this issue should be addressed too.

Furthermore I have noticed, that the provincial vaccine injury reporting form, which was clearly designed for conventional vaccines, does not even have any place to report vaccine injuries of the nature and severity that we are seeing from this new mRNA therapy.

It is now clearly apparent with medical evidence from around the world, that the side-effect profiles of the various gene modification therapies against Covid-19, have been vastly understated by their manufacturers, who were eager to prove their safety.

Thank you for attention to this critically urgent public health matter.

Yours sincerely,

Dr. Charles Hoffe

The IH (Interior Health) responded to his letter publicly and it was published in the Ashcroft Cache Creek Journal as they tried to do “damage control” and attack Dr. Hoffe.

IH says COVID-19 vaccines safe despite claims of Lytton physician

Doctor makes unsubstantiated claims about serious side effects of Moderna vaccine

by BARBARA RODEN

Interior Health (IH) is reassuring Lytton and area residents about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, after a physician in that community shared a letter in which he claimed that the death of a Lytton resident was linked to the Moderna vaccine.

In a letter to Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry dated April 5, Dr. Charles Hoffe claimed that there had been “numerous” allergic reactions — including two cases of anaphylaxis — among people in Lytton and area who had received the Moderna vaccine. He also claimed that three people were exhibiting “ongoing and disabling” neurological deficits.

Hoffe also claimed that the death of a 72-year-old patient with COPD, 24 days after the man was vaccinated, was “presumed” to be vaccine-induced. The physician did not produce any evidence to prove that any of the events resulted from the vaccine.

“It has been a challenge for us to investigate this thoroughly and take reports seriously,” says Dr. Carol Fenton, Medical Health Officer with IH. In a written statement issued on April 14, Fenton says that “There have been no deaths or lasting adverse reactions connected to the Moderna/Pfizer vaccines, or any COVID-19 vaccine, in Lytton, Interior Health, or B.C. at this time.”

The statement adds that IH knows unequivocally that the vaccines are safer than COVID-19 itself, and that the vaccines have been demonstrated to be safe and effective through all levels of clinical trials.

“There is a detailed process to review all adverse effects following immunizations, and all serious events are recorded and reported to the provincial and national level to monitor for safety signals that may be missed at the local level. With the information we have from the vaccine roll-out so far, the COVID-19 vaccines are very safe.”

Fenton tells the Journal that while there will always be some variations between medical practitioners, when it comes to the safety of vaccines it is important to look at consensus-based reports from those who are trained in the field.

“These people are the experts of the experts,” she says. “I can answer most vaccine questions, but I don’t consider myself to be an expert in vaccines. The decisions and analyses are defined by people with the skills and expertise to parse through the information we have.”

The immunization clinics being run by IH have trained vaccinators on site to monitor for and respond to allergic and anaphylactic reactions, which are rare, but can occur with any vaccine or medication.

“The safety of people in Lytton, Nlaka’pamux, and Northern St’at’imc Nations and all communities is the top priority, and our recommendation is that all individuals should get immunized when they are eligible,” says the statement. (Full article here.)

So basically the same as what we are seeing around the rest of the world when honest doctors come forward and report the truth.

The health authorities lie. No science, no statistics, just an appeal to authority. “We know what we are talking about, but this doctor does not.”

A local and independent talk show host in Canada, Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson, tracked down and interviewed Dr. Hoffe. The original show is an hour long and on her Facebook Page, as well as her Bitchute Channel.

We have extracted the 30 minute interview with Dr. Hoffe, and it is on our Rumble channel, and will also be on our Bitchute channel.

Dr. Hoffe has served the members of his community for 28 years, and he had a wonderful reputation among his patients, with glowing online reviews.It is being reported now on some social media sites that his patients are being told he is no longer available to meet with them.

Bari Weiss and Critical Race Theory @JennyHatch

This post also appeared on my Substack this morning…

Three men stood up this past week after saying ENOUGH!

I was so pleased this morning to watch the zoom call between Bari Weiss, Paul Rossi, and Andrew Gutmann that was taped last night. The link is here if you want to give it a listen.

Last week my friend Gary Thompson also stood up to the woke mob and spoke out against Critical Race Theory in a nationally syndicated radio show with Kate Dalley.

Click on the image to listen!

I personally believe these three men and their families are the bravest people in our country right now. It would be worth your time to listen to the shows and then step up and use your voice to help stamp out the racist ideology known as Critical Race Theory.

One of the questions that really touched my heart during Baris interview with Paul and Andrew was when Andrew explained how we as parents should be setting powerful examples for our children of bravery and doing what is right knowing that we might be hammered for it.

Here are a few clips from the interview

Open and closing song is Everyone’s a little bit Racist from the show Avenue Q

I was also stunned by Andrews story of how his daughter spoke up and wrote a letter and that they are probably shunned right now from all private schools in New York and are looking for alternatives for middle school education. I personally believe the middle school years are the absolute best time for students to hang out with their parents and get a grip on the adult world. Especially that key 7th grade year when so many children make permanent decisions on which direction they want their lives to go.

I want to share just a bit of my own story to wrap up this post because I have lived the woke existence in Colorado for the past thirty years.

When we were expecting our second child in 1991 we moved to Boulder Colorado. Boulder has a reputation of being the most highly educated county in America. We have more PhD’s than any other place in the world and conservatives joke that we live in The People’s Republic of Boulder. 

I have been an out of the closet conservative willing to speak up publicly about political and education issues and because I was one of the founding mothers of the Tea Party, I have interacted with people from all over the political spectrum who also stepped up to help with various conservative causes. I also engaged with the press quite a bit. So, many people in my community know that I am a conservative with a voice and an online platform.

Because of this fact, I have had the wild experience of quiet personal conversations with many people confessing to me that they too are conservative but for the sake of their businesses, they could not be open about it.

This has happened so many times, especially with small business owners, that I have wondered if Boulder County is just one big mass of fakers who are pretending to be woke, but are really and truly conservative in the quiet of the day.

In thinking about how to flip things quickly, and unlike Andrew who believes it is going to take a long time to fix this problem because of how entrenched it is in our schools and institutions, I believe the quickest way to fix it is to do what President Trump was doing just before he left office. He signed an executive order demonetizing it. Meaning, no more tax dollars were going to be used to sensitivity train people who worked for the military and the federal government.

President Biden immediately put it back in place once he came into office, but it was remarkable to observe what happened when the little cottage industry of “educators” was being deprived of their income.

Those yelling the loudest about cancel culture being cancelled are those who are making money from it.

Join Fair For All by Clicking the image below.

Click to join! I did…

Jenny Marie Hatch

Dr. Gary Thompson on Critical Race Theory

Dear Community & Neighbors:

I have been flooded with requests to share the video of the mini town hall meeting that I was invited to speak at in Murray regarding Critical Race Theory.

It was a pretty powerful and intimate meeting. I was emotionally and intellectually drained for three days after I went home to my family. I knew this was going to be different when I looked into the eyes of many of my white neighbors and fellow parents and saw fear and sadness. It became my sole goal at that moment to assist with eliminating that fear, as well as to provide some level of hope.

My COO Brook Wardle has the tape, and over the next few weeks we will be working on editing the tape and releasing many clips of the meeting.

Releasing the whole tape in its entirety is not a option due to the extreme level of intimacy and subject matters that were based on my family history and legacy. I also went after BLM hard. Real hard. Perhaps in hindsight? Too hard. 😉

That’s a legacy that mainstream media and progressive trolls on Facebook/Twitter will never have the opportunity to mock or re-edit to suit their nefarious purposes.

In the meantime, I suggest that you hear Kate Daley’s national radio interview she did with me last month on the same subject. (Someone told me a few weeks ago that it got over 10 million views.). I don’t have the link right now, but it’s easy to find via Google.

One national radio interview….one national tv interview….and one town hall meeting. I put myself out there and laid it all on the line. As such, I really don’t feel the need to make the public appearance rounds of your local school boards, the State Board, the Tribune, and especially, our newly woke (and filled with “white guilt”) Republican lawmakers and Governor regarding this subject matter.

It would destroy my family. It would emotionally destroy me. That’s not gonna happen.

I brought the proverbial horse to the water at great risk, but I’m afraid that it is now your turn to drink it and then rise up against this garbage with every ounce of your being.

This WILL destroy your community.

This will break apart many families.

This will emotionally harm your vulnerable children on more levels than I can write at the moment.

Being the expert of your child takes a lot of “stones”, and can be frightening….but please believe me when I tell you that it is worth the journey.

God bless all of you parental rock stars.

“Parents are, and must always be, the resident experts of their own children.”

Best regards;

Gary Thompson, Psy.D.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/utahnsagainstcommoncore/permalink/3549442091948509/

Dr. Thompson explains why he is limiting his exposure to the media in this Facebook post.

Tomorrow will be the last time I speak publicly on race issues and the Critical Race Agenda during a invite only community townhall meeting in Murray for about 40-50 local Murray parents.

One hour long. I speak for 30 minutes, then I open it up to the room for questions.

No Press. No cameras. The only camera that will be in the room will be mine.

I will send out various clips of interest to community leaders in education…..then I’m done.

I will leave my community with a national radio interview, a national tv interview, clips from this parent townhall. Other than that? Nothing.

We are in the midst of a national and local race civil war. I promised a year ago on this site that my family will not participate, and we will watch from the sidelines as our community and country rip each other apart emotionally, and otherwise.

Could I do more? Sure.

Should I do more? Nope. I’m not sacrificing my family and our mental health to wage a war against politicians , the national/local media, and the Utah State Board of Education.

My kids and family are healthy and safe and removed from this toxic garbage.

I wish you all luck with yours, and I believe I have provided enough information (at great risk I may add) to the community to the extent where I can sleep very well at night.

“Parents are, and must always be, the resident experts of their OWN children.”

Best regards;

Gary

Gary was on the Kate Daly Show. This is a MUST LISTEN show!

https://soundcloud.app.goo.gl/agNNADzzJfCYLHLv7

I will share the video clips of Dr. Thompson at the townhall as they appear on the web.

Jenny Marie Hatch

PS I have been stunned by the brave fathers who are standing up right now. Bari Weiss profiled the dad from New York who wrote a letter that is ripping around the internet right now.

It is embedded below.

April 13, 2021 

Dear Fellow Brearley Parents, 

Our family recently made the decision not to reenroll our daughter at Brearley for the 2021-22 school year. She has been at Brearley for seven years, beginning in kindergarten. In short, we no longer believe that Brearley’s administration and Board of Trustees have any of our children’s best interests at heart. Moreover, we no longer have confidence that our daughter will receive the quality of education necessary to further her development into a critically thinking, responsible, enlightened, and civic minded adult. I write to you, as a fellow parent, to share our reasons for leaving the Brearley community but also to urge you to act before the damage to the school, to its community, and to your own child’s education is irreparable. 

It cannot be stated strongly enough that Brearley’s obsession with race must stop. It should be abundantly clear to any thinking parent that Brearley has completely lost its way. The administration and the Board of Trustees have displayed a cowardly and appalling lack of leadership by appeasing an anti-intellectual, illiberal mob, and then allowing the school to be captured by that same mob. What follows are my own personal views on Brearley’s antiracism initiatives, but these are just a handful of the criticisms that I know other parents have expressed. 

I object to the view that I should be judged by the color of my skin. I cannot tolerate a school that not only judges my daughter by the color of her skin, but encourages and instructs her to prejudge others by theirs. By viewing every element of education, every aspect of history, and every facet of society through the lens of skin color and race, we are desecrating the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and utterly violating the movement for which such civil rights leaders believed, fought, and died. 

I object to the charge of systemic racism in this country, and at our school. Systemic racism, properly understood, is segregated schools and separate lunch counters. It is the interning of Japanese and the exterminating of Jews. Systemic racism is unequivocally not a small number of isolated incidences over a period of decades. Ask any girl, of any race, if they have ever experienced insults from friends, have ever felt slighted by teachers or have ever suffered the occasional injustice from a school at which they have spent up to 13 years of their life, and you are bound to hear grievances, some petty, some not. We have not had systemic racism against Blacks in this country since the civil rights reforms of the 1960s, a period of more than 50 years. To state otherwise is a flat-out misrepresentation of our country’s history and adds no understanding to any of today’s societal issues. If anything, longstanding and widespread policies such as affirmative action, point in precisely the opposite direction. 

I object to a definition of systemic racism, apparently supported by Brearley, that any educational, professional, or societal outcome where Blacks are underrepresented is prima facie evidence of the aforementioned systemic racism, or of white supremacy and oppression. Facile and unsupported beliefs such as these are the polar opposite to the intellectual and scientific truth for which Brearley claims to stand. Furthermore, I call bullshit on Brearley’s oft-stated assertion that the school welcomes and encourages the truly difficult and uncomfortable conversations regarding race and the roots of racial discrepancies. 

I object to the idea that Blacks are unable to succeed in this country without aid from government or from whites. Brearley, by adopting critical race theory, is advocating the abhorrent viewpoint that Blacks should forever be regarded as helpless victims, and are incapable of success regardless of their skills, talents, or hard work. What Brearley is teaching our children is precisely the true and correct definition of racism. 

I object to mandatory anti-racism training for parents, especially when presented by the rent-seeking charlatans of Pollyanna. These sessions, in both their content and delivery, are so sophomoric and simplistic, so unsophisticated and inane, that I would be embarrassed if they were taught to Brearley kindergarteners. They are an insult to parents and unbecoming of any educational institution, let alone one of Brearley’s caliber. 

I object to Brearley’s vacuous, inappropriate, and fanatical use of words such as “equity,” “diversity” and “inclusiveness.” If Brearley’s administration was truly concerned about so-called “equity,” it would be discussing the cessation of admissions preferences for legacies, siblings, and those families with especially deep pockets. If the administration was genuinely serious about “diversity,” it would not insist on the indoctrination of its students, and their families, to a single mindset, most reminiscent of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Instead, the school would foster an environment of intellectual openness and freedom of thought. And if Brearley really cared about “inclusiveness,” the school would return to the concepts encapsulated in the motto “One Brearley,” instead of teaching the extraordinarily divisive idea that there are only, and always, two groups in this country: victims and oppressors. 

l object to Brearley’s advocacy for groups and movements such as Black Lives Matter, a Marxist, anti family, heterophobic, anti-Asian and anti-Semitic organization that neither speaks for the majority of the Black community in this country, nor in any way, shape or form, represents their best interests. 

I object to, as we have been told time and time again over the past year, that the school’s first priority is the safety of our children. For goodness sake, Brearley is a school, not a hospital! The number one priority of a school has always been, and always will be, education. Brearley’s misguided priorities exemplify both the safety culture and “cover-your-ass” culture that together have proved so toxic to our society and have so damaged the mental health and resiliency of two generations of children, and counting. 

I object to the gutting of the history, civics, and classical literature curriculums. I object to the censorship of books that have been taught for generations because they contain dated language potentially offensive to the thin-skinned and hypersensitive (something that has already happened in my daughter’s 4th grade class). I object to the lowering of standards for the admission of students and for the hiring of teachers. I object to the erosion of rigor in classwork and the escalation of grade inflation. Any parent with eyes open can foresee these inevitabilities should antiracism initiatives be allowed to persist. 

We have today in our country, from both political parties, and at all levels of government, the most unwise and unvirtuous leaders in our nation’s history. Schools like Brearley are supposed to be the training grounds for those leaders. Our nation will not survive a generation of leadership even more poorly educated than we have now, nor will we survive a generation of students taught to hate its own country and despise its history. 

Lastly, I object, with as strong a sentiment as possible, that Brearley has begun to teach what to think, instead of how to think. I object that the school is now fostering an environment where our daughters, and our daughters’ teachers, are afraid to speak their minds in class for fear of “consequences.” I object that Brearley is trying to usurp the role of parents in teaching morality, and bullying parents to adopt that false morality at home. I object that Brearley is fostering a divisive community where families of different races, which until recently were part of the same community, are now segregated into two. These are the reasons why we can no longer send our daughter to Brearley. 

Over the past several months, I have personally spoken to many Brearley parents as well as parents of children at peer institutions. It is abundantly clear that the majority of parents believe that Brearley’s antiracism policies are misguided, divisive, counterproductive and cancerous. Many believe, as I do, that these policies will ultimately destroy what was until recently, a wonderful educational institution. But as I am sure will come as no surprise to you, given the insidious cancel culture that has of late permeated our society, most parents are too fearful to speak up. 

But speak up you must. There is strength in numbers and I assure you, the numbers are there. Contact the administration and the Board of Trustees and demand an end to the destructive and anti-intellectual claptrap known as antiracism. And if changes are not forthcoming then demand new leadership. For the sake of our community, our city, our country and most of all, our children, silence is no longer an option. 

Respectfully, 

Andrew Gutmann

More on Andrews letter at The Daily Mail HERE.

Dr. Naomi Wolf on Vaccine Passports – MUST LISTEN!

The End of America?

…Lastly, driving all human interaction onto Zoom is not only a way to harvest all of our tech, business secrets and IP – it is a way to ensure that intimacy and connection in the future will be done online and that human face-to-face contact will be killed off.

Why is this? Why develop policies that punish, encumber and restrict human contact in analog (unsurveilled, unmediated) spaces?

Because human contact is the great revolutionary force when it comes to human freedom and resistance to this form of comprehensive biofascism – the biofascism represented by the New Normal – the medico-fascist Step Ten. 

Now let me recap from the year 2008, and read you my intro to The End of America, as well as the warning at the close of that book. 

Its message has never, sadly, been more timely. This time, threats to freedom justified by terrorism then, have reclothed themselves in the trappings of a medical pandemic.

But this time we do not just face a war on freedom. This time we face a war on human beings, and on all that makes us human.

Naomi Wolf

https://twitter.com/Nilphredil/status/1382908731546030083?s=20

https://twitter.com/ElvisBaker9/status/1382893363905503233?s=20

https://twitter.com/MachadoRedacted/status/1382871868462469122?s=20

Substack Vaccine Chat

Clint Watts shameless use of his daughters disability to guilt trip society into getting vaccinated is evil

A recent chat on Substack deconstructed

Here is the link to Dr. Horowitz excellent article on herd immunity. The text is embedded below.

The text of this post was also published on Substack HERE.

Jenny Hatch

FORCED VACCINATIONS & COVID-19 MIND-CONTROL WON’T GAIN “HERD IMMUNITY,” and WHY YOU SHOULD SHARE THIS INFORMATION

by

Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz

 (MedicalVeritas.org; December 6, 2020)

Why “We Are All in This Together”

COVID-19 MIND CONTROL is largely failing because at the time of this writing more than 60% of citizens won’t submit to forced vaccinations nor “contact-tracing” in many communities.

Click to watch Clint Watts on MSNBC today spewing PURE propaganda

As you can tell by the Trump Administration’s court battles over the “stolen election,” where ‘the-rubber-meets-the-road’ is in courts of law. The same is true for forced vaccinations and social impositions such as contact-tracing and mask-wearing.

In vaccination law that is used to advance forced vaccinations, also called “immunization mandates,”  “general agreement” about the benefits of vaccines presumes that efficacy and safety is “generally accepted.”

Actual science is not necessary. The vaccines need not be sufficiently proven without question. The “SAFETY” of “mandated vaccines” is simply presumed to be in the “public interest” according to general acceptance.

That’s why you need to integrate and spread this intelligence. Because by awakening the masses about the risks, you are actually helping to establish the new “general agreement” that impacts pending court decisions.

This is the ‘remedy’ for governmental and Big Pharma’s efforts to deprive you of your health, safety, faith in God and religious freedom as considered below.(1)

Litigation Activism

On December 3, 2020, I filed a lawsuit in federal court to block the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA “genetic therapies” falsely advertised as “vaccines.” I didn’t file this because I believe I would win. I filed it to protect you, your brain, health and safety, because that is my duty and yours–our collective duty.

As nearly everyone expects, when the FDA approves the Pfizer and Moderna misrepresented “vaccines,” where the-rubber-meets-the-road is in our “collective consciousness”—our ‘group-mindset’. This is the main reason the phrase “We Are All in This Together” has been selected and promoted to gain mass-persuasion and your compliance with totalitarian impositions—The “Final Solution.”

It is widely-known public knowledge and political history that the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”) administered the top-secret mind-control program for social-engineering called “MK-ULTRA.”

In law, this administration of MK-ULTRA-like “mind-control” produces what is called “general agreement,” “general-acceptance,” or the “general consensus” in society. And this ‘general agreement’ in society heavily impacts lawmakers and judges in courts of law.

The Legal Importance of “General Acceptance”

In vaccination law that is used to advance forced vaccinations, also called “immunization mandates,”  “general agreement” about the benefits of vaccines presumes that efficacy and safety is “generally accepted.”

Actual science is not necessary. The vaccines need not be sufficiently proven without question. The “SAFETY” of “mandated vaccines” is presumed to be in the “public interest” according to general acceptance.

The “compelling interest” of society is presumed to justify forced vaccinations.

This is the “bar” or burden officials and Big Pharma lawyers have thus far operated under. Anyone opposing this “compelling interest” would need to exceed this “bar” to meet the burden of overturning vaccination mandates in order to resist submission to forced blood intoxications.

In addition, “general agreement” holds that the “compelling interest” in public health requires “herd immunity”. Although this presumption is seriously flawed (as I argue below) it is the deciding factor.

The original landmark case of Jacobsen v. Massachusettsestablished this precedent now being challenged in courts of law across America. The infamous Constitutional attorney Alan Dershowitz debated Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on this issue. I critically analyzed their defective debate.

Why Sharing this Information is so Important

This is why SHARING THIS INFORMATION IS SO IMPORTANT. Saving-people’s lives depends on it. Saving even civilization from advancing injected artificial intelligence (AI)—the biotechnologies advertised to be injected via vaccinations such a “bio-chips” and “quantum dots”–requires the collective consciousness to establish the compelling social interest to say “NO.”

You likely noticed that the polls preceding Trump’s usurpation were as “rigged” as the election. The polls were rigged to influence behavior, and control the outcome.

The same is true for forced vaccinations. Fake polls have been increasingly published to establish the lie—that the majority of people favor getting vaccinated for COVID-19.

That is, you are being brain-washed to believe that the “general agreement” of the “herd” believes that these COVID-19 vaccines are good, safe and effective, and worthy of trusting governors and Big Pharma’s criminals with your life.

Take, for example the poll published by STAT-Harris in October, 2020, depicted in the graphs below. “The share of Americans interested in getting COVID-19 vaccine as soon as possible is dropping,” this pro-Pharma propaganda warned.

Between August and October 2020, the number of people “likely to get vaccinated” with a COVID-19 vaccine dropped dramatically after Democrats objected to the Trump administration’s handling of the pandemic response.

Black and Hispanic Americans especially voiced concern according to the October 2020 STAT-Harris Poll. “Only 43% of Black individuals said they would pursue a vaccine as soon as it was available, a sharp drop from 65% in mid-August,” the pro-Pharma article reported. ‘Vaccine hesitancy’ got more extreme over the next month as the following CNN Poll publicized. Only 14% of Blacks and 34% of Latinos trusted vaccines.

These numbers overwhelming challenge the “general acceptance” or “general agreement” that vaccines are good, and have profound implications on pending lawsuits opposing forced vaccinations, especially by religious persons as further explained below.

This so-called public health “emergency” reflecting Black and Hispanic “consciousness,” especially in the Black community targeted to receive the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines “first” (along with health workers), impacts the “compelling interest of the state” to force these vaccines on anyone.

The “general agreement” or “general consensus” among Blacks distrusting vaccines largely because of the government’s “Tuskeegee Experiment” and this author’s Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional? tracking the origin of these plagues to Anglo-American covert operations during the Special Virus Cancer Program, prompted the pro-Pharma mass media to heavily target Blacks so that they can be forced (like poor Whites) to get vaccinated to retain or gain privileges, such as being able to fly on an airplane, gain employment, or receive social benefits.

The screenshots below show the polls and propaganda used to convince Black people that the Pfizer and Moderna “genetic therapies” are great.

The Old Case Law Undermining Constitutional Rights and Religious Freedom

You may recall that the First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees “Freedom of Religion.” You may also recall that in Jacobsen v. Massachusetts, minister Jacobsen was forced by the “general agreement” that vaccines are good to either pay a $5 fine to abstain, or otherwise submit. Now however, in 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the “compelling interest” of Governor Cuomo is insufficient to overrule religious gathering rights.

Comparing Jacobsen and the latest decision in ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN,NEW YORK v. ANDREW M. CUOMO, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, where the-rubber-meets-the-road in this discussion, pursuant to widespread public acceptance of forced vaccinations as “safe and effective” for “immunizations,” the Supreme Court in Jacobson held:

“A common belief, like common knowledge, does not require evidence to establish its existence, but may be acted upon without proof by the legislature and the courts. . . .

“The fact that the belief is not universal is not controlling, for there is scarcely any belief that is accepted by everyone. The possibility that the belief may be wrong, and that science may yet show it to be wrong, is not conclusive; for the legislature has the right to pass laws which, according to the common belief of the people, are adapted to prevent the spread of contagious diseases. In a free country, where the government is by the people, through their chosen representatives, practical legislation admits of no other standard of action; for what the people believe is for the common welfare must be accepted as tending to promote the common welfare, whether it does in fact of not. Any other basis would conflict with the spirit of the Constitution, and would sanction measures opposed to a republican form of government. While we do not decide and cannot decide that vaccination is a preventive of smallpox, we take judicial notice of the fact that this is the common belief of the people of the State, and with this fact as a foundation we hold that the statute in question is a health law, enacted in a reasonable and proper exercise of the police power.” 72 N.E. Rep. 97.

The New Case Law Securing Constitutional Rights and Religious Freedom

Superseding Jacobsen v. Massachusetts, in the case of ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN v. CUOMO, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on November 25, 2020, to enjoin New York Governor Cuomo from depriving religious groups in a “red zone,” versus businesses in an “orange zone,” from congregating.

The Supreme Court granted the religious objectors an injunction against the forced deprivation of gathering rights based on the “Likelihood of success on the merits. The applicants . . . made a strong showing that the challenged restrictions violate ‘the minimum requirement of neutrality’ to religion. Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U. S. 520, 533 (1993).

In other words, ‘neutrality to religion’ must be honored and administered by all state and federal officials.

Now that only leaves private companies, such as Facebook, Google, Amazon, the airlines, and thousands of multi-national corporations potentially free to violate people’s religious rights by mandating forced vaccinations for employment or air travel.

Religious Freedom, Spiritual Sustenance, and General Acceptance

What all of this history neglects, and where the-rubber-will-ultimately-meet-the-road, is with the fundamental and quintessential “general agreement” among all religious groups in the “Holy Spirit” power administering healing.

All monotheists agree (with Zen Buddhists too) that there is a Holy Spirit power of Love (or “chi energy”) that protects us, sustains us, rejuvenates us, and heals us.

Common knowledge and agreement in the religious world is that the “Holy Spirit Power of Love” immunizes us against evil, biological and social discord, and illness. That is the foundation of religion (karmic law in Buddhism as well, and even medical theology in Chinese acupuncture, etc.). This Holy Spirit protection and restoration is also the general agreement among the vast-majority of people worldwide.

Consequently, the main presumed legal question raised by forced vaccinations based on the  high “bar” of “general acceptance,” as well as society’s “compelling interest,” is seriously flawed.

How so?

So far, the legal presumption and main question diverts from the “truth that shall set us free.”

The most important legal question addressing society’s ‘general agreement’ should be:

“Does the general acceptance of all religions espousing faith in Holy Spiritual function/administration of protection/restoration of health reflect the compelling interest of the state, as well as private companies, to apply First Amendment religious freedom protections for the exception/exemption from mandatory vaccinations.”

The answer to this question is what must eventually be decided at the level of the U.S. Supreme Court.

MK-ULTRA Social Engineering to Promote General Acceptance of Forced Vaccinations Can Never Exceed the Bar of Religious/Spiritual Persons

Now anyone who is “conscious,” reasonably aware of politics and geopolitics advancing globalism and more totalitarian controls over civilization, advancing artificial intelligence (“AI”) toward a “Final Solution” that relies on forced vaccinations advertised to include “bio-chips” for merging medical data, even people’s brains with the Cloud, must now consider the strategic importance of MK-ULTRA-like mind-control and social engineering programs.

General acceptance of this corporate-fascist state requires more persuasive polling, advertising, and marketing to overcome the decreasing faith and trust in forced vaccinations. The mass awakening does not, nor cannot, trust Big Pharma more than God. Nor can vaccines, such as Pfizer and Moderna’s “game changing” mRNA “genetic therapies” (falsely called vaccinations) compete with the Holy Spirit Power of Love that provides protection and does all the healing.

The Big Pharma, Big Tech and Big Banking globalists cannot ever overcome this hurdle. They will never be able to evade the “spiritual consensus” for faithful loving people.

This spells doom for Big Pharma and political governors who still push COVID-19 impositions, forced vaccinations, and social restrictions.

The heavy burden on the drug/vaccine industry is akin to convincing viewers witnessing the vaccine parade that those in charge are not disgracefully ‘nude,’ but all wear beautiful clothes. That is, forced vaccinations sponsored by the global elite—the owners, investors, stockholders, the Emperors of Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Big Banking—are royally EXPOSED.

To overcome this reality, this legal hurdle, much more propaganda is needed to convince the “religious herd” that we are not seeing reality for what it is. And even if this MK-ULTRA-like mind control were to increase, it would still fail.

Why?

Because you can’t defeat “Mother Nature.”

To establish the “compelling interest” that COVID-19 vaccines are good, safe, effective, and trustworthy; for injecting/intoxicating our bodies to gain “herd immunity;” increasing amounts of propaganda and attacks against religious activists and groups must be administered to move the population that loves God and the Holy Spirit (Force of nature) to deny the existence of God and the power of the Holy Spirit for healing.

Only criminal psychopaths and delusional idiots would wager on the global elite winning this “Final Battle.”

Conclusion

Now you understand why the corporate-controlled media has been so actively smearing and dividing all religious groups, turning devotees against one-another by the use of fear (not faith), to defraud society, develop/sustain the general agreement that vaccines are safe, effective, and serve a “compelling interest” in helping to protect civilization against the COVID-19 infection.

Those administering this losing battle are criminal psychopaths and delusional.

So please share this information to establish the anti-vaccination general agreement. Educate officials about this “compelling interest” in honoring people’s religious faith and freedom.

By sharing this intelligence, we will all be far better off, far safer, far healthier, and far more “spiritually immunized” against irrational/contrived fears of infectious diseases, rejecting forced vaccinations and all vaccinations in favor of natural cures.

–End–

ATTENTION READERS: The following link is provided for you to submit your comments and concerns to the FDA pursuant to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine certification process. Below the link is a screenshot of Dr. Horowitz’s opposition submission.

Furthermore, communities nationwide, including schools and workplaces, religious groups, public service organizations and more will need to provide education to their members regarding the risks versus benefits of taking COVID-19 vaccines. Ease confusion. Understand the genetics, geopolitics, and economics underlying the pandemic. Dr. Horowitz, the author of the civil complaint against Pfizer and Moderna, is available help. He can be scheduled for online video-conferencing via Zoom or Skype to educate audiences or debate public health officials who advocate getting vaccinated. Please schedule these events for the benefit of citizens who are required to make life and death decisions with “informed consent.” Kindly contact Dr. Horowitz to schedule his educational service by e-mailing your request to: Editor@MedicalVeritas.org.

E-mail your comments and concerns to the FDA at:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/11/27/2020-26229/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-notice-of-meeting-establishment-of-a#open-comment

This video explains what happened on Clint Watts Substack from my perspective.

Last week I was reading Brandy Zadrozny’s twitter and saw a link to a Substack article written by Clint Watts.

I read Brandy and a few other journalists every day because I like to follow the narratives that they are writing about since so much of their reporting touches on topics that are near and dear to my heart like homebirth, Q, and vaccines.

I have noticed that these journalists like to virtue signal to each other and spend quite a bit of time giving each other props on their writing and so called expertise on various issues like Q and President Trumps voters.


This past week they have all been chortling about the Covid vaccines and every time one of them gets the shot they shout it out like teen boys in the locker room sharing the loss of their virginity to the other guys.

On Friday Brandy shared the link from Clint’s substack and I clicked over to his twitter to read the piece and the comments attached to it.

On Twitter all of the comments were supportive and positive, not one dissenting comment in the bunch. Then on the Substack piece, same thing, all support, no ratio whatsoever.


On the web we have this joke about ratio. When someone shares an opinion on anything most will get a positive or a negative vibe that splits about fifty fifty. Whenever you see something with a one hundred percent positive ratio you can assume that some evil is afoot in terms of bots, fake comments, and manipulation of voices.


So often when commenting we will say things like, “I am just here for the ratio”. What that means is, we have stopped by to share a thumbs up or thumbs down but mostly we are there to watch the twitter debate in the comment section and are watching to see how it goes.


That was my attitude when I decided to chime in on Clints use of his daughter as a human shield during this particular final battle in the vaccine war.

The language he used in his piece was so over the top manipulative, it hit all the nodes for propaganda. And the comments were so universally one sided, I had to say something.


After I posted my first comment, (which was later deleted) I then decided to go learn more about Clint.

It was not surprising to me that he is at the heart of the Russian Collusion fraud that was perpetrated on the United States by Deep State actors.

This level of duplicity and fake narrative is only now being completely obliterated by Bill Binney who has exposed the fact that Wikileaks did not hack into the DNC emails.


It was Seth Rich who downloaded the DNC emails on a thumb drive and paid for that action with his life. And what was on the thumb drive shared with Wikileaks and ultimately the world? Pedogate, Pizzagate, Spirit Cooking, Lies, Fraud, Cheating, Stealing, and all manner of “Being Drunken with Iniquity”.


The dates on the emails stop just about the time Seth was murdered in DC. Even DNC chair Donna Brazile was terrified they were going to come after her when it all went down and her friend Seth was murdered. She wrote about that in her book.


So if Clint is comfortable with being the face of Russian fakery and even wrote a book about it, why is it such a leap that he would delve into the whole vaccine war as if his whole life depended upon everyone getting vaccinated?

The number one thing the media gatekeepers are afraid of is losing status and power over the narrative.

They admit this every day as they write and write and write. They can feel their influence and ability to control how people think just flitting away in the wind and it literally guts them.


The other side of the story is that the mockingbird media are puppets who are controlled by a very small group of gatekeepers and they are compelled to write what the slave drivers want or the journalists are tortured and killed (Or their loved ones die of weaponized cancer in two weeks).

If Clint is one of these compromised individuals, then I believe it is also imperative that those of us who know the truth, must speak the truth and let the chips fall where they may.


I do not believe we should allow the big pharma funded news media to control us any longer. And the children who are being used as collateral damage in this war should be freed from getting any more shots, especially since it was probably the vaccines that gave them their disabilities in the first place.


Jenny Marie Hatch

PS I took some screen grabs of the comments from Clints article on Substack. His daughter Pepper is darling and I wish her well as she navigates through mortality.

Here are the screengrabs of a few comments from Clints Substack (just in case they get memory holed).

If the demonic in our midst manage to pass a vaccine passport national bill, there is always this.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CNbw7aiheW8/?igshid=dkcht4afc0vz

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CNiWBlqg99f/?igshid=7hr1myf16pji