She agreed with the nurse who came forward that “genocide” is the proper word to describe what they were seeing with the adverse reactions to the experimental COVID injections.
If I had a magic wand, it would just stop. It would stop now, before we hurt anybody else. That would be amazing.
That would be the best day ever, because every day I wake up, I think about how I can find that golden nugget to try and wake up the people around me to the damage we are causing.
We are causing — I mean, we heard the word ‘genocide’ from the lady on Wednesday. I don’t disagree with that statement. And it’s terrifying, and it saddens me, and the reason I’m staying where I am for now is to try and make a difference in whatever way I can.
Brian Gerrish then asks her:
And one thing that’s come into my mind while you were talking there, so just allow me one very last one: what advice, or what would you say to your NHS colleagues, to encourage them to think about what’s going on?
She replied:
Honestly, what comes to mind is, “Your children are next.” And that is terrifying, and it makes me well up when I think about it.
So if you won’t speak up because you’ve had the vaccine, or you won’t speak up because you’re scared (I understand that), or you won’t speak up because you don’t want to lose your job (and I totally understand that), just know that this doesn’t stop until we all stand up and say, “Stop.”
And we’re getting younger and younger here now, and our time’s running out.
Listen to the interview and read the transcript at The UKCOLUMN.
The video is currently on the Vimeo platform which has been known to censor anything negative regarding vaccines, so we have copies on our Rumble and Bitchute Channels as well.
Pfizer and BioNTech Apply for Emergency Use to Inject 12 to 15 Year Olds with their mRNA Experimental ShotsJust days after this interview with the Senior NHS Board member, it was announced that Pfizer had applied for emergency use authorization with both the FDA in the U.S., and the EMA in Europe, to inject 12 to 15 year olds with their experimental COVID mRNA shots.FiercePharma reported:The European Medicines Agency (EMA) started an “accelerated assessment” of Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine, known as Comirnaty, for people aged 12 to 15.The EMA said its recommendation could come in June—unless additional information is needed—and would apply to all member states, pending the European Commission’s final consent.The FDA is expected to authorize Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, which it created alongside BioNTech, for adolescents 12 to 15 years old by early next week, The New York Times reports, citing federal officials.The agency’s endorsement would be an amendment to Pfizer’s existing emergency use authorization, and the CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) would likely meet the following day to examine the clinical trial data. (Source.)FiercePharma also announced today that Pfizer has made $3.5 BILLION so far this year for their experimental COVID mRNA shots, and is projected to make $26 BILLION by the end of the year.In the first three months of 2021, Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine pulled in as much revenue as some pharma blockbusters make in an entire year. That’s just the beginning, as Pfizer eyes sales from more than a billion additional doses before the end of 2021.The mRNA-based shot Comirnaty—first to market in the U.S.—reeled in $3.5 billion globally in the first quarter, Pfizer said (PDF) in its earnings report. For the full year, Pfizer projects a whopping $26 billion in Comirnaty sales, based on the 1.6 million doses the company has pledged worldwide.Meanwhile, Pfizer now has a full FDA approval in its sights. (Full article.)Are the Europeans and the U.S. citizens going to allow this to happen? Many have voluntarily accepted the injections for themselves, but will they now sacrifice their children on the altar of pharmakeia?Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter.If you say, “But we knew nothing about this,” does not he who weighs the heart perceive it? Does not he who guards your life know it? Will he not repay each person according to what he has done? (Proverbs 24:11-12)Comment on this article at HealthImpactNews.com.
I am so amazed by the brave doctors who are risking EVERYTHING to get the truth out. And the indie journalists who are documenting their claims. Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson interviews Dr. Charles Hoffe.
Contact me if you have a Covid Vaccine story to tell…
Comments by Brian Shilhavy Editor, Health Impact News
Charles Hoffe has been a medical doctor for 28 years in the small, rural town of Lytton in British Columbia, Canada. The town is comprised of many indigenous groups and the “First Nations.”
When Dr. Hoffe was given 900 doses of the Moderna experimental COVID-19 injections, he administered the doses through the Lytton Medical Clinic to those who wanted them.
He chose not to inject himself.
Dr. Hoffe reports that the result of injecting 900 people among the indigenous First Nations community was that 2 people went into anaphylactic shock, one person died, and several others have suffered what appear to be permanent disabilities. He relates how one of his patients is in so much pain now, that she prefers death to life.
By contrast, no one in the community died or became permanently disabled due to the COVID-19 virus for the past year.
Dr. Hoffe reported these adverse reactions by email to the medical personnel in his community who were responsible for the roll-out of the Moderna shots, which included pharmacists, nurses, and doctors in his area, a total of about 18 people he says.
His email expressed grave concern over the side effects he was seeing, and he asked if perhaps they should pause the injections for a while.
He reports that within 48 hours he received a very stern rebuke from his superiors at the Interior Health Authority accusing him of causing “vaccine hesitancy” and that they were going to report him to BC College of Physicians and Surgeons.
They forbade him from saying anything negative about the Moderna shots by issuing a gag order against him.
Dr. Hoffe explains that this is a method of intimidation that is being used against other doctors who have become too afraid to speak out, because the College of Physicians and Surgeons has great authority to shut down doctors’ careers, or heavily fine them.
As he continued to see more injuries the following week, he became very angry about his gag order. He was told that if he had any concerns about the injections that he had to contact the medical health officer in charge of the Moderna roll out.
He did, but when he did not receive a reply, he decided to write an open letter directly to Dr. Bonnie Henry, British Columbia Provincial Health Officer, in direct defiance of his gag order since he made it public.
Here is a copy of the letter.
Dr. Charles D. Hoffe, BSc, MB, BCh, LMCC Lytton Medical Clinic Lytton BC V0K 1Z0
5 April, 2021
Dr. Bonnie Henry, British Columbia Provincial Health Officer Ministry of Health 1515 Blanchard Street Victoria, BC, V8W 3C9
Dear Dr. Henry,
The first dose of the Moderna vaccine has now been administered to some of my patients in the community of Lytton, BC. This began with the First Nations members of our community in mid-January, 2021. 900 doses have now been administered.
I have been quite alarmed at the high rate of serious side-effects from this novel treatment. From this relatively small number of people vaccinated so far, we have had:
Numerous allergic reactions, with two cases of anaphylaxis.
One (presumed) vaccine induced sudden death, (in a 72 year old patient with COPD. This patient complained of being more short of breath continually after receiving the vaccine, and died very suddenly and unexpectedly on day 24, after the vaccine. He had no history of cardiovascular disease).
Three people with ongoing and disabling neurological deficits, with associated chronic pain, persisting for more than 10 weeks after their first vaccine. These neurological deficits include: continual and disabling dizziness, generalised or localized neuromuscular weakness, with or without sensory loss. The chronic pain in these patients is either generalised or regional, with or without headaches.
So in short, in our small community of Lytton, BC, we have one person dead, and three people who look as though they will be permanently disabled, following their first dose of the Moderna vaccine. The age of those affected ranges from 38 to 82 years of age.
So I have a couple of questions and comments:
Are these considered normal and acceptable long term side-effects for gene modification therapy? Judging by medical reports from around the world, our Lytton experience is not unusual.
Do you have any idea what disease processes may have been initiated, to be producing these ongoing neurological symptoms?
Do you have any suggestions as to how I should treat the vaccine induced neurological weakness, the dizziness, the sensory loss, and the chronic pain syndromes in these people, or should they be all simply referred to a neurologist? I anticipate that many more will follow, as the vaccine is rolled out. This was only phase one, and the first dose.
In stark contrast to the deleterious effects of this vaccine in our community, we have not had to give any medical care what-so-ever, to anyone with Covid-19. So in our limited experience, this vaccine is quite clearly more dangerous than Covid-19.
I realize that every medical therapy has a risk-benefit ratio, and that serious disease calls for serious medicine. But we now know that the recovery rate of Covid-19, is similar to the seasonal flu, in every age category. Furthermore, it is well known that the side effects following a second shot, are significantly worse than the first. So the worst is still to come.
It must be emphasised, that these people were not sick people, being treated for some devastating disease. These were previously healthy people, who were offered an experimental therapy, with unknown long-term side-effects, to protect them against an illness that has the same mortality rate as the flu. Sadly, their lives have now been ruined.
It is normally considered a fundamental principal of medical ethics, to discontinue a clinical trial if significant harm is demonstrated from the treatment under investigation.
So my last question is this: Is it medically ethical to continue this vaccine rollout, in view of the severity of these life altering side-effects, after just the first shot? In Lytton, BC, we have an incidence of 1 in 225 of severe life altering side-effects, from this experimental gene modification therapy.
I have also noticed that these vaccine induced side effects are going almost entirely unreported, by those responsible for the vaccine rollout. I am aware that this is often a problem, with vaccines in general, and that delayed side-effects after vaccines, are sometimes labelled as being “coincidences”, as causality is often hard to prove. However, in view of the fact that this is an experimental treatment, with no long-term safety data, I think that perhaps this issue should be addressed too.
Furthermore I have noticed, that the provincial vaccine injury reporting form, which was clearly designed for conventional vaccines, does not even have any place to report vaccine injuries of the nature and severity that we are seeing from this new mRNA therapy.
It is now clearly apparent with medical evidence from around the world, that the side-effect profiles of the various gene modification therapies against Covid-19, have been vastly understated by their manufacturers, who were eager to prove their safety.
Thank you for attention to this critically urgent public health matter.
Yours sincerely,
Dr. Charles Hoffe
The IH (Interior Health) responded to his letter publicly and it was published in the Ashcroft Cache Creek Journal as they tried to do “damage control” and attack Dr. Hoffe.
IH says COVID-19 vaccines safe despite claims of Lytton physician
Doctor makes unsubstantiated claims about serious side effects of Moderna vaccine
by BARBARA RODEN
Interior Health (IH) is reassuring Lytton and area residents about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, after a physician in that community shared a letter in which he claimed that the death of a Lytton resident was linked to the Moderna vaccine.
In a letter to Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry dated April 5, Dr. Charles Hoffe claimed that there had been “numerous” allergic reactions — including two cases of anaphylaxis — among people in Lytton and area who had received the Moderna vaccine. He also claimed that three people were exhibiting “ongoing and disabling” neurological deficits.
Hoffe also claimed that the death of a 72-year-old patient with COPD, 24 days after the man was vaccinated, was “presumed” to be vaccine-induced. The physician did not produce any evidence to prove that any of the events resulted from the vaccine.
“It has been a challenge for us to investigate this thoroughly and take reports seriously,” says Dr. Carol Fenton, Medical Health Officer with IH. In a written statement issued on April 14, Fenton says that “There have been no deaths or lasting adverse reactions connected to the Moderna/Pfizer vaccines, or any COVID-19 vaccine, in Lytton, Interior Health, or B.C. at this time.”
The statement adds that IH knows unequivocally that the vaccines are safer than COVID-19 itself, and that the vaccines have been demonstrated to be safe and effective through all levels of clinical trials.
“There is a detailed process to review all adverse effects following immunizations, and all serious events are recorded and reported to the provincial and national level to monitor for safety signals that may be missed at the local level. With the information we have from the vaccine roll-out so far, the COVID-19 vaccines are very safe.”
Fenton tells the Journal that while there will always be some variations between medical practitioners, when it comes to the safety of vaccines it is important to look at consensus-based reports from those who are trained in the field.
“These people are the experts of the experts,” she says. “I can answer most vaccine questions, but I don’t consider myself to be an expert in vaccines. The decisions and analyses are defined by people with the skills and expertise to parse through the information we have.”
The immunization clinics being run by IH have trained vaccinators on site to monitor for and respond to allergic and anaphylactic reactions, which are rare, but can occur with any vaccine or medication.
“The safety of people in Lytton, Nlaka’pamux, and Northern St’at’imc Nations and all communities is the top priority, and our recommendation is that all individuals should get immunized when they are eligible,” says the statement. (Full article here.)
So basically the same as what we are seeing around the rest of the world when honest doctors come forward and report the truth.
The health authorities lie. No science, no statistics, just an appeal to authority. “We know what we are talking about, but this doctor does not.”
A local and independent talk show host in Canada, Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson, tracked down and interviewed Dr. Hoffe. The original show is an hour long and on her Facebook Page, as well as her Bitchute Channel.
We have extracted the 30 minute interview with Dr. Hoffe, and it is on our Rumble channel, and will also be on our Bitchute channel.
Dr. Hoffe has served the members of his community for 28 years, and he had a wonderful reputation among his patients, with glowing online reviews.It is being reported now on some social media sites that his patients are being told he is no longer available to meet with them.
…Lastly, driving all human interaction onto Zoom is not only a way to harvest all of our tech, business secrets and IP – it is a way to ensure that intimacy and connection in the future will be done online and that human face-to-face contact will be killed off.
Why is this? Why develop policies that punish, encumber and restrict human contact in analog (unsurveilled, unmediated) spaces?
Because human contact is the great revolutionary force when it comes to human freedom and resistance to this form of comprehensive biofascism – the biofascism represented by the New Normal – the medico-fascist Step Ten.
Now let me recap from the year 2008, and read you my intro to The End of America, as well as the warning at the close of that book.
Its message has never, sadly, been more timely. This time, threats to freedom justified by terrorism then, have reclothed themselves in the trappings of a medical pandemic.
But this time we do not just face a war on freedom. This time we face a war on human beings, and on all that makes us human.
Naomi Wolf
I literally warned everyone that the business model per the website was regular "boosters" — two months ago — and was deplatformed for the warning. Can people just notice what is reality now please? https://t.co/pPtHrQMtAS
On @reddit there is an active group called LockdownSkeptisism, with over 30,000 members. Here is a link to an "Ask Me Anything" (AMA) that I did with them today. Smart and intelligent questions. https://t.co/fjTGw7ojvT
COVID-19 MIND CONTROL is largely failing because at the time of this writing more than 60% of citizens won’t submit to forced vaccinations nor “contact-tracing” in many communities.
Click to watch Clint Watts on MSNBC today spewing PURE propaganda
As you can tell by the Trump Administration’s court battles over the “stolen election,” where ‘the-rubber-meets-the-road’ is in courts of law. The same is true for forced vaccinations and social impositions such as contact-tracing and mask-wearing.
In vaccination law that is used to advance forced vaccinations, also called “immunization mandates,” “general agreement” about the benefits of vaccines presumes that efficacy and safety is “generally accepted.”
Actual science is not necessary. The vaccines need not be sufficiently proven without question. The “SAFETY” of “mandated vaccines” is simply presumed to be in the “public interest” according to general acceptance.
That’s why you need to integrate and spread this intelligence. Because by awakening the masses about the risks, you are actually helping to establish the new “general agreement” that impacts pending court decisions.
This is the ‘remedy’ for governmental and Big Pharma’s efforts to deprive you of your health, safety, faith in God and religious freedom as considered below.(1)
Litigation Activism
On December 3, 2020, I filed a lawsuit in federal court to block the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA “genetic therapies” falsely advertised as “vaccines.” I didn’t file this because I believe I would win. I filed it to protect you, your brain, health and safety, because that is my duty and yours–our collective duty.
As nearly everyone expects, when the FDA approves the Pfizer and Moderna misrepresented “vaccines,” where the-rubber-meets-the-road is in our “collective consciousness”—our ‘group-mindset’. This is the main reason the phrase “We Are All in This Together” has been selected and promoted to gain mass-persuasion and your compliance with totalitarian impositions—The “Final Solution.”
It is widely-known public knowledge and political history that the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”) administered the top-secret mind-control program for social-engineering called “MK-ULTRA.”
In law, this administration of MK-ULTRA-like “mind-control” produces what is called “general agreement,” “general-acceptance,” or the “general consensus” in society. And this ‘general agreement’ in society heavily impacts lawmakers and judges in courts of law.
The Legal Importance of “General Acceptance”
In vaccination law that is used to advance forced vaccinations, also called “immunization mandates,” “general agreement” about the benefits of vaccines presumes that efficacy and safety is “generally accepted.”
Actual science is not necessary. The vaccines need not be sufficiently proven without question. The “SAFETY” of “mandated vaccines” is presumed to be in the “public interest” according to general acceptance.
The “compelling interest” of society is presumed to justify forced vaccinations.
This is the “bar” or burden officials and Big Pharma lawyers have thus far operated under. Anyone opposing this “compelling interest” would need to exceed this “bar” to meet the burden of overturning vaccination mandates in order to resist submission to forced blood intoxications.
In addition, “general agreement” holds that the “compelling interest” in public health requires “herd immunity”. Although this presumption is seriously flawed (as I argue below) it is the deciding factor.
The original landmark case of Jacobsen v. Massachusettsestablished this precedent now being challenged in courts of law across America. The infamous Constitutional attorney Alan Dershowitz debated Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on this issue. I critically analyzed their defective debate.
Why Sharing this Information is so Important
This is why SHARING THIS INFORMATION IS SO IMPORTANT. Saving-people’s lives depends on it. Saving even civilization from advancing injected artificial intelligence (AI)—the biotechnologies advertised to be injected via vaccinations such a “bio-chips” and “quantum dots”–requires the collective consciousness to establish the compelling social interest to say “NO.”
You likely noticed that the polls preceding Trump’s usurpation were as “rigged” as the election. The polls were rigged to influence behavior, and control the outcome.
The same is true for forced vaccinations. Fake polls have been increasingly published to establish the lie—that the majority of people favor getting vaccinated for COVID-19.
That is, you are being brain-washed to believe that the “general agreement” of the “herd” believes that these COVID-19 vaccines are good, safe and effective, and worthy of trusting governors and Big Pharma’s criminals with your life.
Take, for example the poll published by STAT-Harris in October, 2020, depicted in the graphs below. “The share of Americans interested in getting COVID-19 vaccine as soon as possible is dropping,” this pro-Pharma propaganda warned.
Between August and October 2020, the number of people “likely to get vaccinated” with a COVID-19 vaccine dropped dramatically after Democrats objected to the Trump administration’s handling of the pandemic response.
Black and Hispanic Americans especially voiced concern according to the October 2020 STAT-Harris Poll. “Only 43% of Black individuals said they would pursue a vaccine as soon as it was available, a sharp drop from 65% in mid-August,” the pro-Pharma article reported. ‘Vaccine hesitancy’ got more extreme over the next month as the following CNN Poll publicized. Only 14% of Blacks and 34% of Latinos trusted vaccines.
These numbers overwhelming challenge the “general acceptance” or “general agreement” that vaccines are good, and have profound implications on pending lawsuits opposing forced vaccinations, especially by religious persons as further explained below.
This so-called public health “emergency” reflecting Black and Hispanic “consciousness,” especially in the Black community targeted to receive the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines “first” (along with health workers), impacts the “compelling interest of the state” to force these vaccines on anyone.
The “general agreement” or “general consensus” among Blacks distrusting vaccines largely because of the government’s “Tuskeegee Experiment” and this author’s Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional?tracking the origin of these plagues to Anglo-American covert operations during the Special Virus Cancer Program, prompted the pro-Pharma mass media to heavily target Blacks so that they can be forced (like poor Whites) to get vaccinated to retain or gain privileges, such as being able to fly on an airplane, gain employment, or receive social benefits.
The screenshots below show the polls and propaganda used to convince Black people that the Pfizer and Moderna “genetic therapies” are great.
The Old Case Law Undermining Constitutional Rights and Religious Freedom
You may recall that the First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees “Freedom of Religion.” You may also recall that in Jacobsen v. Massachusetts, minister Jacobsen was forced by the “general agreement” that vaccines are good to either pay a $5 fine to abstain, or otherwise submit. Now however, in 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the “compelling interest” of Governor Cuomo is insufficient to overrule religious gathering rights.
“A common belief, like common knowledge, does not require evidence to establish its existence, but may be acted upon without proof by the legislature and the courts. . . .
“The fact that the belief is not universal is not controlling, for there is scarcely any belief that is accepted by everyone. The possibility that the belief may be wrong, and that science may yet show it to be wrong, is not conclusive; for the legislature has the right to pass laws which, according to the common belief of the people, are adapted to prevent the spread of contagious diseases. In a free country, where the government is by the people, through their chosen representatives, practical legislation admits of no other standard of action; for what the people believe is for the common welfare must be accepted as tending to promote the common welfare, whether it does in fact of not. Any other basis would conflict with the spirit of the Constitution, and would sanction measures opposed to a republican form of government. While we do not decide and cannot decide that vaccination is a preventive of smallpox, we take judicial notice of the fact that this is the common belief of the people of the State, and with this fact as a foundation we hold that the statute in question is a health law, enacted in a reasonable and proper exercise of the police power.” 72 N.E. Rep. 97.
The New Case Law Securing Constitutional Rights and Religious Freedom
Superseding Jacobsen v. Massachusetts, in the case of ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN v. CUOMO, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on November 25, 2020, to enjoin New York Governor Cuomo from depriving religious groups in a “red zone,” versus businesses in an “orange zone,” from congregating.
The Supreme Court granted the religious objectors an injunction against the forced deprivation of gathering rights based on the “Likelihood of success on the merits. The applicants . . . made a strong showing that the challenged restrictions violate ‘the minimum requirement of neutrality’ to religion. Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U. S. 520, 533 (1993).
In other words, ‘neutrality to religion’ must be honored and administered by all state and federal officials.
Now that only leaves private companies, such as Facebook, Google, Amazon, the airlines, and thousands of multi-national corporations potentially free to violate people’s religious rights by mandating forced vaccinations for employment or air travel.
Religious Freedom, Spiritual Sustenance, and General Acceptance
What all of this history neglects, and where the-rubber-will-ultimately-meet-the-road, is with the fundamental and quintessential “general agreement” among all religious groups in the “Holy Spirit” power administering healing.
All monotheists agree (with Zen Buddhists too) that there is a Holy Spirit power of Love (or “chi energy”) that protects us, sustains us, rejuvenates us, and heals us.
Common knowledge and agreement in the religious world is that the “Holy Spirit Power of Love” immunizes us against evil, biological and social discord, and illness. That is the foundation of religion (karmic law in Buddhism as well, and even medical theology in Chinese acupuncture, etc.). This Holy Spirit protection and restoration is also the general agreement among the vast-majority of people worldwide.
Consequently, the main presumed legal question raised by forced vaccinations based on the high “bar” of “general acceptance,” as well as society’s “compelling interest,” is seriously flawed.
How so?
So far, the legal presumption and main question diverts from the “truth that shall set us free.”
The most important legal question addressing society’s ‘general agreement’ should be:
“Does the general acceptance of all religions espousing faith in Holy Spiritual function/administration of protection/restoration of health reflect the compelling interest of the state, as well as private companies, to apply First Amendment religious freedom protections for the exception/exemption from mandatory vaccinations.”
The answer to this question is what must eventually be decided at the level of the U.S. Supreme Court.
MK-ULTRA Social Engineering to Promote General Acceptance of Forced Vaccinations Can Never Exceed the Bar of Religious/Spiritual Persons
Now anyone who is “conscious,” reasonably aware of politics and geopolitics advancing globalism and more totalitarian controls over civilization, advancing artificial intelligence (“AI”) toward a “Final Solution” that relies on forced vaccinations advertised to include “bio-chips” for merging medical data, even people’s brains with the Cloud, must now consider the strategic importance of MK-ULTRA-like mind-control and social engineering programs.
General acceptance of this corporate-fascist state requires more persuasive polling, advertising, and marketing to overcome the decreasing faith and trust in forced vaccinations. The mass awakening does not, nor cannot, trust Big Pharma more than God. Nor can vaccines, such as Pfizer and Moderna’s “game changing” mRNA “genetic therapies” (falsely called vaccinations) compete with the Holy Spirit Power of Love that provides protection and does all the healing.
The Big Pharma, Big Tech and Big Banking globalists cannot ever overcome this hurdle. They will never be able to evade the “spiritual consensus” for faithful loving people.
This spells doom for Big Pharma and political governors who still push COVID-19 impositions, forced vaccinations, and social restrictions.
The heavy burden on the drug/vaccine industry is akin to convincing viewers witnessing the vaccine parade that those in charge are not disgracefully ‘nude,’ but all wear beautiful clothes. That is, forced vaccinations sponsored by the global elite—the owners, investors, stockholders, the Emperors of Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Big Banking—are royally EXPOSED.
To overcome this reality, this legal hurdle, much more propaganda is needed to convince the “religious herd” that we are not seeing reality for what it is. And even if this MK-ULTRA-like mind control were to increase, it would still fail.
Why?
Because you can’t defeat “Mother Nature.”
To establish the “compelling interest” that COVID-19 vaccines are good, safe, effective, and trustworthy; for injecting/intoxicating our bodies to gain “herd immunity;” increasing amounts of propaganda and attacks against religious activists and groups must be administered to move the population that loves God and the Holy Spirit (Force of nature) to deny the existence of God and the power of the Holy Spirit for healing.
Only criminal psychopaths and delusional idiots would wager on the global elite winning this “Final Battle.”
Conclusion
Now you understand why the corporate-controlled media has been so actively smearing and dividing all religious groups, turning devotees against one-another by the use of fear (not faith), to defraud society, develop/sustain the general agreement that vaccines are safe, effective, and serve a “compelling interest” in helping to protect civilization against the COVID-19 infection.
Those administering this losing battle are criminal psychopaths and delusional.
So please share this information to establish the anti-vaccination general agreement. Educate officials about this “compelling interest” in honoring people’s religious faith and freedom.
By sharing this intelligence, we will all be far better off, far safer, far healthier, and far more “spiritually immunized” against irrational/contrived fears of infectious diseases, rejecting forced vaccinations and all vaccinations in favor of natural cures.
–End–
ATTENTION READERS: The following link is provided for you to submit your comments and concerns to the FDA pursuant to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine certification process. Below the link is a screenshot of Dr. Horowitz’s opposition submission.
Furthermore, communities nationwide, including schools and workplaces, religious groups, public service organizations and more will need to provide education to their members regarding the risks versus benefits of taking COVID-19 vaccines. Ease confusion. Understand the genetics, geopolitics, and economics underlying the pandemic. Dr. Horowitz, the author of the civil complaint against Pfizer and Moderna, is available help. He can be scheduled for online video-conferencing via Zoom or Skype to educate audiences or debate public health officials who advocate getting vaccinated. Please schedule these events for the benefit of citizens who are required to make life and death decisions with “informed consent.” Kindly contact Dr. Horowitz to schedule his educational service by e-mailing your request to: Editor@MedicalVeritas.org.
I read Brandy and a few other journalists every day because I like to follow the narratives that they are writing about since so much of their reporting touches on topics that are near and dear to my heart like homebirth, Q, and vaccines.
I have noticed that these journalists like to virtue signal to each other and spend quite a bit of time giving each other props on their writing and so called expertise on various issues like Q and President Trumps voters.
This past week they have all been chortling about the Covid vaccines and every time one of them gets the shot they shout it out like teen boys in the locker room sharing the loss of their virginity to the other guys.
On Friday Brandy shared the link from Clint’s substack and I clicked over to his twitter to read the piece and the comments attached to it.
On Twitter all of the comments were supportive and positive, not one dissenting comment in the bunch. Then on the Substack piece, same thing, all support, no ratio whatsoever.
On the web we have this joke about ratio. When someone shares an opinion on anything most will get a positive or a negative vibe that splits about fifty fifty. Whenever you see something with a one hundred percent positive ratio you can assume that some evil is afoot in terms of bots, fake comments, and manipulation of voices.
.@selectedwisdom urges Americans to get vaccinated so that kids with disabilities like his daughter Pepper can get back to school.
So often when commenting we will say things like, “I am just here for the ratio”. What that means is, we have stopped by to share a thumbs up or thumbs down but mostly we are there to watch the twitter debate in the comment section and are watching to see how it goes.
That was my attitude when I decided to chime in on Clints use of his daughter as a human shield during this particular final battle in the vaccine war.
The language he used in his piece was so over the top manipulative, it hit all the nodes for propaganda. And the comments were so universally one sided, I had to say something.
After I posted my first comment, (which was later deleted) I then decided to go learn more about Clint.
It was not surprising to me that he is at the heart of the Russian Collusion fraud that was perpetrated on the United States by Deep State actors.
This level of duplicity and fake narrative is only now being completely obliterated by Bill Binney who has exposed the fact that Wikileaks did not hack into the DNC emails.
It was Seth Rich who downloaded the DNC emails on a thumb drive and paid for that action with his life. And what was on the thumb drive shared with Wikileaks and ultimately the world? Pedogate, Pizzagate, Spirit Cooking, Lies, Fraud, Cheating, Stealing, and all manner of “Being Drunken with Iniquity”.
The dates on the emails stop just about the time Seth was murdered in DC. Even DNC chair Donna Brazile was terrified they were going to come after her when it all went down and her friend Seth was murdered. She wrote about that in her book.
So if Clint is comfortable with being the face of Russian fakery and even wrote a book about it, why is it such a leap that he would delve into the whole vaccine war as if his whole life depended upon everyone getting vaccinated?
The number one thing the media gatekeepers are afraid of is losing status and power over the narrative.
They admit this every day as they write and write and write. They can feel their influence and ability to control how people think just flitting away in the wind and it literally guts them.
The other side of the story is that the mockingbird media are puppets who are controlled by a very small group of gatekeepers and they are compelled to write what the slave drivers want or the journalists are tortured and killed (Or their loved ones die of weaponized cancer in two weeks).
If Clint is one of these compromised individuals, then I believe it is also imperative that those of us who know the truth, must speak the truth and let the chips fall where they may.
I do not believe we should allow the big pharma funded news media to control us any longer. And the children who are being used as collateral damage in this war should be freed from getting any more shots, especially since it was probably the vaccines that gave them their disabilities in the first place.
PS I took some screen grabs of the comments from Clints article on Substack. His daughter Pepper is darling and I wish her well as she navigates through mortality.
All of this prompted the obvious question: how could MSNBC and CBS News have both purported to “independently confirm” a CNN bombshell that was completely false? The reason this matters is because the term “independently confirm” significantly bolsters the credibility of the initial report because it makes it appear that other credible-to-some news organizations have conducted their own investigation and found more evidence that proves it is true. That is the purpose of the exercise: to bolster the credibility of the story in the minds of the public.
But what actually happens is as deceitful as it is obvious. When a news outlet such as NBC Newsclaims to have “independently corroborated” a report from another corporate outlet, they often do not mean that they searched for and acquired corroborating evidence for it. What they mean is much more tawdry: they called, or were called by, the same anonymous sources that fed CNN the false story in the first place, and were fed the same false story. And just as CNN did — repeated what they were told (almost certainly by Democratic Congressional members and/or their staff) without independently investigating it, because they knew any anti-Trump story would please their partisan audience — NBC News pretended they had obtained “independent confirmation” when all they had done was speak to the same sources that fed CNN.
This episode is so worth recalling not only because it is one of the most stunning and pathetic media humiliations of the Trump era — though it is that — but also because the shoddy tactic that drove it is still in full use by the same media outlets. We just saw proof of that again with a major Washington Post “correction” — which should be called a retraction — of one of the most-discussed news stories of the last six months: the Post’s claims about what Trump said when he called a Georgia election official while he was still contesting the 2020 election results.
On January 9, The Washington Postpublished a story reporting that an anonymous source claimed that on December 23, Trump spoke by phone with Frances Watson, the chief investigator of the Georgia Secretary of State’s office, and directed her that she must “find the fraud” and promised her she would be “a national hero” if she did so. The paper insisted that those were actual quotes of what Trump said. This time, it was CNNpurporting to independently confirm thePost’s reporting, affirming that Trump said these words “according to a source with knowledge of the call.”
But late last week, The Wall Street Journalobtaineda recording of that call, and those quotes attributed to Trump do not appear. As a result, The Washington Post — two months after its original story that predictably spread like wildfire throughout the entire media ecosystem — has appended a correction at the top of its original story. Politico’s Alex Thompson correctly pronounced these errors “real bad” because of how widely they spread and were endorsed by other major media outlets.”
For those who harbor reverence for US Govt pronouncements, the only time it commented on the Hunter laptop was when DNI said there was no evidence Russia was involved. That claim came from Brennan-led ex-CIA agents & was laundered by gullible US media:https://t.co/9QdJTnIOAz
Good to see this – but look at the first tweet with the false claim about Russia's involvement and see how widespread it is, and that guy has no incentive to delete it because the benefits of the re-tweets and increased followers are too sweet:https://t.co/OgdE0riIbX
Even this guy's walkbacks and concessions are false. He can't admit he just made this up. He did. Usually they rely on the fact that reports like this are very long & people with other jobs don't have time to read them. This one is short: take a look to see how casually they lie. pic.twitter.com/oHY1GBvc9L
This is why the biggest fucking scam in media right now are the "disinformation units" of NBC, CNN & NYT. Here's one of their stars who bravely tattles on 4Chan teenagers endorsing and spreading a blatant lie about an issue that actually matters, that everyone now sees is false. pic.twitter.com/YlNZ3SQDwr
As I wrote today, and I think it's the key truth of US media: "the sectors of the media pretending to be most distraught about “disinformation are, in fact, the most aggressive, prolific and destructive disseminators of that disinformation by far." https://t.co/pUNdIpo8eo
If you think the real power centers in the US are the Proud Boys, 4Chan & Boogaloos rather than the CIA, FBI, NSA, Wall Street and Silicon Valley, and spend most of your time battling the former while serving the latter as stenographers, your journalism is definitionally shit.