In October a group from the World Health Organization gathered to discuss how to get people to accept and actually use the new vaccines. I put that report into a movie and the Pdf is embedded below.
Tag Jenny Hatch
The dreaded SHED. A few thoughts on Vaccine Shedding @JennyHatch
I read Lyz Lenz and have subscribed to her Substack for months. Her pregnancy book is a must read.
She is brilliant, hilarious, and writes better than anyone I have ever read.
This morning her newsletter zeroed in on the conservative males who have reported they will NOT be getting vaccinated. She also linked to a stupefying article written by Talia Lavin.
Reading Talias article made me feel so sad.
She wrote:
“As the petals drop to the pavement and shots slip into arms, we’re rolling inexorably toward Hot Vaxxed Girl Summer. We, the immunized, survivors of the plague, are supposed to emerge from our Covid quarantines without hesitancy. The problem with this is that I was never Hot in the first place and this Summer is no different.
…So many people have died this year, millions, and I have survived to take into my body a miraculous shot that is the very flower of medical science, a code written in my genome to lock out the great threat. And I, imbibing this, have the temerity to not even be sexy. If Vaxxed Girl Summer is meant to be a kind of pan-cultural Rumspringa I ought to be someone that transcends schlubhood under its thrilling aegis. And yet…
She finished the article with these stunning words:
…I never learned how to be flat enough, silent enough, to be all winking, passive chrome. During the pandemic I was lucky enough to be cloistered; this privileged solitude left me alone with a mind that wouldn’t stop buzzing, alone with a body that kept manufacturing its own insistent and extraneous desires. I know that there are many women who excel at both the labor of performed femininity.
Who lust and take with grace, and who are as skilled in attaining their own pleasure as they are at giving pleasure away. Still, after this wearing year, a year of morgue-trucks and uncertainty and pain, I am still a woman unskilled at womanhood, not new to its arts but still humbler than an apprentice: A supplicant at the door of the temple.
The world calls me out into the light of Hot Vaxxed Girl Summer, to be warm and poised and lush, but the spring is still cold and I am frightened and frozen at the threshold. Each step I take from an isolation in which my body, being alone, had no locus of comparison, is a step back into a world of all-too-familiar shame.
Forgiving myself for every untoward fold and hair, every lemurish attempt at eyeliner, every clumsy waddle on thighs like boiled dumplings, forgiving myself for being me, or even just for being, is its own ongoing labor.
Having survived through a plague I want to live every inch of my survival, the world my oyster and I, its irritant little pearl, the gem at the lip of the mantle, to be plucked out and buffed to shining nacre.
Instead I’m the oyster, all slime in the throat, eating grit. Still, I lived. My body allowed me to hide and survive and, surely, for this it has earned a little grace.
Penelope, the wife of Odysseus, undid her weaving each night to ward off suitors and buy herself time. I too have much to unthread each time I close my door on the world.
From the poor material of myself, I have to spin patience and a little kindness. Hot Vaxxed Girl Summer is coming, and all I can do is set my fat hands to the loom.”
Talia Lavin is a freelance journalist and author of the recent book “Culture Warlords: My Journey into the Dark Web of White Supremacy.”
Weeping, I clicked over to Talias twitter feed after finishing her article and saw this tweet…
Talias tweet is a perfect example of why society should never allow twenty something mockingbird journalists to frame the important issues of the day with their perfect prose.
They do not know anything, about anything important. These oversized children are naively trusting yet arrogant enough to laugh and mock those of us who understand the science of the dreaded shed.
Heck, I read about shedding 32 years ago when I was training to become a Childbirth Educator and learned that the only documented cases of polio in recent years were diagnosed in men who changed their childrens diapers after they received the polio vaccine.
Communicable.
Contagious.
Spreads from person to person through saliva, sweat, urine, and feces.
The vaccinated patient sheds for weeks after getting the shot.
I know this.
The Pharma companies know this.
Talia and her twitter tribe obviously do not.
As per her question of what percentage of the population knows about shedding?
The educated side. The side that knows to avoid those who were recently vaccinated over concerns of having the dreaded cytokine storm or cascade of symptoms that in some leads to death.
There is a reason I will be staying home from church now that the vaccine is widely being given to members of my congregation. As someone who has lived with anaphylactic allergies since I was a baby, I now wonder if I will ever go out in public again.
Pfizer knew during the drug trials for the Covid shot that shedding was causing miscarriages in the women with ties to the vaccine trial participants.
Associated Secondary Adverse Event.
It even has a name.
Jenny Marie Hatch
Read the whole Pfizer report HERE!
Here is what just this small portion of the Pfizer document is saying:
1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:
A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: Have babies that have congitive difficulties.
This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.”
TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed to people who did have the vax.
THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.
Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is indeed the kill shot.
Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now official.
Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from pfizer:
Terms:
Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.
8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
* A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
* A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
* A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
____
If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting?
If this vax is not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about getting a different woman pregnant?
____
That’s not all, the following is detailed, and far worse.
The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy).
* If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last dose of study intervention.
* If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF;
however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. Follow-up is conducted to obtain general information on the pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome. The investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion (or until pregnancy termination) and notify Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a follow-up to the initial EDP Supplemental Form.
In the case of a live birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the time of birth. In the event of a termination, the reason(s) for termination should be specified and, if clinically possible, the structural integrity of the terminated fetus should be assessed by gross visual inspection (unless preprocedure test findings are conclusive for a congenital anomaly and the findings are reported).
Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety as SAEs follows:
* Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion;
* Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention.
Additional information regarding the EDP may be requested by the sponsor. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be handled on a case-by-case basis (eg, follow-up on preterm infants to identify developmental delays). In the case of paternal exposure, the investigator will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to deliver to his partner. The investigator must document in the source documents that the participant was given the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to provide to his partner.
8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form.
When exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.
An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.
Here’s the clear part of this, that everyone can understand:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care.
The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE.
The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.
I WILL TRANSLATE THAT TO ENGLISH:
An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form.
SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.
Dr. Tenpenny Expains In Simple Terms Some Of The Dangers of The Covid-19 “Vaccine”
Dr. Tenpenny is an integrative medicine physician in Cleveland, OH who has studied the vaccine problems for over 20 years – read 1000s of mainstream medical scientific papers and has put in over 40,000 hours of study on these issues
Certificate of Vaccine Identification Artificial Intelligence COVID-19 is an acronym for Certificate of Vaccine Identification 19 (19 ==> 1 for A and 9 for I, thus AI)
- This “vaccine” is not a vaccine, but an exceptionally well-designed genetic modification killing tool
- It can cause full blown autoimmune disease anywhere from 2 years and up to 20 years after injection !!!
- This “vaccine “ permanently alters host immune system
- Not only does shot NOT stop host from getting sick, the antibody (AB) itself turns on host’s body creating havoc & massive auto-immune disease
- Governments around the world are saying NO to mRNA vaccines because they are a form of MASS MURDER = GENOCIDE
- Remember that genocide is absolutely a key part of the Deep State Plan
Spike protein AG presented to host immune system in 1 of 2 ways
Pathway 1 – CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY
Spike protein fragment antigen (AG) binds MHC-1 receptor in ER & then MCH-1 Protein Complex leaves ER as vesicle to be exocytosed at plasma membrane
This MCH-1 Protein Complex then binds to and activates cytotoxic T-cells
Pathway 2 – Antibody-Mediatedy IMMUNITY
Remainder of article discusses this pathway
How Shot Works
- Spike protein mRNA created from viral DNA spike protein sequence via revverse transcriptase
- Spike protein mRNA transcribed by ribosomes to create spike protein
- mRNA codes for the spike protein on corona viruses (37 corona viruses out there for at least 60 years, but only 7 infect humans)
- WHAT SHE SAYS ABOUT TRANSFECTION DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME, AS TRANSFECTION IS INTRODUCTION OF FOREIGN DNA OR RNA ????
- Host DNA is indirectly, not directly, affected
- Spike protein binds to ACE receptor to gain entry into host cell to begin to replicate
- It takes up to six weeks for this spike protein to be fully expressed & for re-exposure problems to surface
- Then, host immune system generates AB against spike protein
- The problem is that the AB against spike protein is a non-neutralizing AB, that it, it is NOT made against the entire virus, but only the spike protein
- Spike protein antibody (AB) is a non-neutralizing antibody (unlike measles, mumps, chickenpox, shingles, etc. antibodies)
- An antibody (AB) has 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fac fragment in the shape of a “Y” (which is creepy in an of itself ==> Family Y)
- Fab fragments bind to antigen to neutralize it and make it go away
With this shot, the Fac fragment causes alot of problems - FAc fragment can bind to tissue in the lungs, Eosinoophils, Basophilss, other receptors that can cause anaphalatic shock, can cause direct modification of macrophages, can cross react with human tissues to cause autoimmune disease via molecular mimicry
- A key problem is B cell sensitization – the AB generating B cells retain memory of the AB forever (Memory B cells
- We have no idea how long the spike protein will last in host
- We have no idea how long the AB will last in host
- We have no idea how long the B cells will continue to be active
- For the rest of host’s life, host may be suseptible to autoimmune disease, shock, allergies & death from this injection
10 Mechanisms by which this Injection Can Cause Harm (Dr. Tenpenny can only cover a few in this video)
PEG – Polyethelene Glycol
- The coding around the mRNA is unstable, so they had to encase it in a lipid bubble (liposome)
- The lipid bubble contains PEG
- Humans have been sensitized (i.e. primed or made allergic to) to PEG via many, many products over the decades
- In 1960, about 2% of population was sensitized to PEG
- In 2021, about 70-72% of population is now sensitized to PEG
- PEG reaction can cause an acute allergic reaction and/or anaphalactic shock & death
- PEG is in Moderna & Pfizer shots
Concept of “Re-Exposure” or Antibody Dependent Enhancement
- There are many folks who have taken the shot and say “Look at me, I’ve had no problems !!!”
- Well, the problem comes when that person is re-exposed to any of the corona viruses
- The anti-spike AB can then set up autoimmune disease
- Anti-spike AB can bind to spike protein, AG-AB complex internalized in macrophages (MP), RNA of virus released inside MP then causes
- OVERWHELMING infection (MUCH WORSE than had you never had the shot)
- They have been trying to develop ABs against corona virus since 2005 because the flu, a corona virus, has a large burden of disease WW and there are corona viruses other than flu that also have a large burden of illness (so getting a corona virus vaccine is desireable)
- Scientists have NEVER been able to get their studies (ABs against the full virus) past the safety studies on rats, rabbits, ferrets, hamsters & monkeys). These animals all got extremely sick or died on re-exposure to corona virus. Failure on both safety & efficacy.
- These evil, Cabal, DS scientists are very smart & have almost unlimited money to spend on their genocidal projects
- With COVID vaccine, they did not even bother with animal studies, and went straight to humans
AG-AB complex Can Cross BBB
- Can converts two proteins in the brain and cause them to malfunction
- When these two proteins are corrupted, one can lead to ALS and one to Frontal Temporal Lobe Degeneration (Alzheimers Dementia)
- Covid Vaccine linked to infertility (placental protein deviously & malevolently contained in shot causes generation of Anti-placenta AB)
Mechanism of Cytokine Storm
- Macrophages (MPs) are the little garbage eaters of the immune system
- Two types of macrophages (MP): MP1 & MP2
- MP1 is active on initial infection
- When MP1 attacks pathogen, cytokines are released
- Cytokines are proinflammatory & cause fever & call in NK cells
- As infection begins to resovle, MP2 come in like fire fighters to quell & calm the hot inflammatory soup & then begin to clean up debris
- MP1 ==> increased cytokines (what you want in initial infection)
- MP2 ==> decreased cytokines (also what you want to resolve initial infection)
- The Anti-spike AB inactivates MP2s by binding by the FAc fragment to the MP2 cells ==> fire fighters CANNOT show up because they are inactivated
So the cytokine storm goes on and on and on - The OFF SWITCH has been deactivated – “There is an ON SWITCH, but NO OFF SWITCH”
New J&J Shot
- We have very little information on this shot
- Spike protein is inserted into an adenovirus (> 100 different strains for adenovirus) to gain entry into host
- Some adenoviruses turn on ONOCGENES that can cause cancer
Autoimmune Disease & the “Vaccine”
- A well-know immunologist tested the Anti-spike AB on 55 tissue types to determine cross reactivity
- The Anti-spike AB cross reacted with 28 of the tissue antigens
- Thus, you can see how a plethora of autoimmune diseases can take hold.
- Hundreds of Sx can look different, but underlying pathology is that the Anti-spike AB, via molecular mimicry, interacts with up to 28 different tissue AGs in multiple organ systems
VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System)
- As of 2/18/21 VAERS has over 1000 reported deaths
- This is about 10% of what is out there, so 10,000 – 100,000 deaths are possible just SO FAR
- > 19,0000 adverse events reported
- This is about 10% of what is out there, so 190,000 to 1,000,000 adverse events are possible just SO FAR
- In the next 4-18 months, we can expect to see massive injury & major death from these shots
FDA & CDC have violated 3 areas of Federal Law to allow the Emergency Use Authorization for the “Vaccine”
- Given a 99.91 % Survivability of COVID , “Vaccine” is much less “effective” & this is part of Emergency Use Authorization criteria being violated
Other Effective Treatments that can also PREVENT infection
- HCQ, Zinc, Ivermectin, High Dose Vitamin C & High Dose Vitamin D
ADDITIONAL LINKS
https://medicalveritas.org/horowitz-battles-pfizer-over-genocide-discovery/
Healthy Families Make A Healthy World!
Health Impact News Covid Vaccine Side Effects European Reports, the latest at @JennyHatch
I wonder how many thousands of dollars this influencer was paid to create this propaganda? (I balanced it out with a Jennifer Hudson song and some headlines).
My heart is aching with these outrageous numbers of side effects from the vaccine, especially knowing that so many people never report to anyone what happened to them.
8,430 DEAD 354,177 Injuries: European Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 “Vaccines
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The European database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.”
Here is what EudraVigilance states about their database:
This website was launched by the European Medicines Agency in 2012 to provide public access to reports of suspected side effects (also known as suspected adverse drug reactions). These reports are submitted electronically to EudraVigilance by national medicines regulatory authorities and by pharmaceutical companies that hold marketing authorisations (licences) for the medicines.
EudraVigilance is a system designed for collecting reports of suspected side effects. These reports are used for evaluating the benefits and risks of medicines during their development and monitoring their safety following their authorisation in the European Economic Area (EEA). EudraVigilance has been in use since December 2001.
This website was launched to comply with the EudraVigilance Access Policy, which was developed to improve public health by supporting the monitoring of the safety of medicines and to increase transparency for stakeholders, including the general public.
The Management Board of the European Medicines Agency first approved the EudraVigilance Access Policy in December 2010. A revision was adopted by the Board in December 2015 based on the 2010 pharmacovigilance legislation. The policy aims to provide stakeholders such as national medicines regulatory authorities in the EEA, the European Commission, healthcare professionals, patients and consumers, as well as the pharmaceutical industry and research organisations, with access to reports on suspected side effects.
Transparency is a key guiding principle of the Agency, and is pivotal to building trust and confidence in the regulatory process. By increasing transparency, the Agency is better able to address the growing need among stakeholders, including the general public, for access to information. (Source.)
Their report through April 24, 2021 lists 8,430 deaths and 354,177 injuries following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:
- COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414)
- COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH
- COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19)
- COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S)
A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. This subscriber has volunteered to do this, and it is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.
Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.
Here is the summary data through April 24, 2021.
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer: 4,524 deaths and 151,306 injuries to 24/04/2021
- 11,191 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 40 deaths
- 7,372 Cardiac disorders incl. 522 deaths
- 50 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 4,183 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 112 Endocrine disorders
- 4,629 Eye disorders incl. 6 deaths
- 33,33 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 227 deaths
- 103,813General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1459 deaths
- 214 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 16 deaths
- 3,338 Immune system disorders incl. 20 deaths
- 10,160 Infections and infestations incl. 527 deaths
- 3,950 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 89 deaths
- 7,595 Investigations incl. 168 deaths
- 2,564 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 91 deaths
- 53,714 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 47 deaths
- 150 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 7 deaths
- 65,745 Nervous system disorders incl. 425 deaths
- 192 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 7 deaths
- 80 Product issues
- 6,008 Psychiatric disorders incl. 63 deaths
- 938 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 66 deaths
- 994 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 1 death
- 13,954 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 523 deaths
- 16,171 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 35 deaths
- 438 Social circumstances incl. 6 deaths
- 124 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 8 deaths
- 8,220 Vascular disorders incl. 165 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273 (CX-024414) from Moderna: 2,283 deaths and 17,625 injuries to 24/04/2021
- 839 Blood and lymphatic system disordersincl. 16 deaths
- 1,278 Cardiac disorders incl. 231 deaths
- 7 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 378 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 23 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
- 570 Eye disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 3,857 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 80 deaths
- 12,513 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1012 deaths
- 77 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 476 Immune system disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 1,449 Infections and infestations incl. 118 deaths
- 803 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 44 deaths
- 1,087 Investigations incl. 60 deaths
- 515 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 47 deaths
- 5,669 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 47 deaths
- 48 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 8 deaths
- 7,489 Nervous system disorders incl. 244 deaths
- 50 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
- 8 Product issues
- 862 Psychiatric disorders incl. 31 deaths
- 299 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 23 deaths
- 106 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 1 death
- 2,198 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 197 deaths
- 2,163 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 19 deaths
- 162 Social circumstances incl. 6 deaths
- 109 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 13 deaths
- 1,166 Vascular disorders incl. 74 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental vaccine AZD1222 (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ AstraZeneca: 1,579 deaths and 184,833 injuries to 24/04/2021
- 5,319 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 64 deaths
- 7,374 Cardiac disorders incl. 199 deaths
- 76 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 5,011 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 155 Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 7,922 Eye disorders incl. 5 deaths
- 56,473 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 62 deaths
- 141,042General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 495 deaths
- 248 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 13 deaths
- 1,837 Immune system disorders incl. 7 deaths
- 10,631 Infections and infestations incl. 99 deaths
- 4,341 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 18 deaths
- 9,798 Investigations incl. 21 deaths
- 6,977 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 18 deaths
- 82,522 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 16 deaths
- 144 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 4 deaths
- 111,873Nervous system disorders incl. 244 deaths
- 108 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
- 52 Product issues
- 9,514 Psychiatric disorders incl. 12 deaths
- 1,745 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 11 deaths
- 2,076 Reproductive system and breast disorders
- 15,824 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 171 deaths
- 23,168 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersincl. 10 deaths
- 364 Social circumstances incl. 3 deaths
- 383 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 12 deaths
- 8,706 Vascular disorders incl. 91 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 44 deaths and 413 injuries to 24/04/2021
- 11 Blood and lymphatic system disorders
- 45 Cardiac disorders incl. 10 deaths
- 1 Congenital, familial and genetic disorder
- 20 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 1 Endocrine disorder
- 20 Eye disorders
- 109 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 1 death
- 235 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 14 deaths
- 3 Hepatobiliary disorders
- 18 Immune system disorders
- 44 Infections and infestations incl. 2 deaths
- 34 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 1 death
- 61 Investigations
- 19 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 1 death
- 95 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 1 death
- 232 Nervous system disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 3 Product issues
- 45 Psychiatric disorders
- 11 Renal and urinary disorders
- 5 Reproductive system and breast disorders
- 80 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 50 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
- 5 Social circumstances
- 3 Surgical and medical procedures
- 96 Vascular disorders incl. 8 deaths
This is public information funded by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and anyone can use the EudraVigilance system and verify this data.
Denmark and Norway have completely suspended use of the AstraZeneca experimental COVID-19 shots.
A statement issued by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health stated that the AstraZeneca COVID “vaccine” is more dangerous than COVID itself, especially for young people.
The EMA continues to recommend it. They did, however, add a safety warning to the J&J shots, due to fatal blood clots. (Source.)
Comment on this article at HealthImpactNews.com.
1,047 Dead 725,079 Reported Injuries following COVID19 Experimental “Vaccines” Reported in the U.K.
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The UK Government’s reporting system for COVID vaccine adverse reactions from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency released their latest report today, April 29, 2021.
The report covers data collected from December 9, 2020, through April 21, 2021, for the three experimental COVID “vaccines” currently in use in the U.K. from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna.
They report a total of 1,047 deaths and 725,079 injuries recorded following the experimental COVID injections.
685 of the 1,047 deaths followed AstraZeneca COVID injections, and 573,650 of the 725,079 injuries followed AstraZeneca COVID injections.
Two countries, Norway and Denmark, have now completely halted injections of COVID shots by AstraZeneca, with the Norwegian Institute of Public Health stating that the AstraZeneca experimental shots are associated with a higher risk of injury and death than the COVID-19 virus. See:
Norway Stops Experimental AstraZeneca COVID Shots: “Higher Risk Associated with AstraZeneca Vaccine than from COVID-19 Disease”
Other European countries have also temporarily halted the AstraZeneca shots while they review safety data, but the UK has never halted injecting people with the shot causing fatal blood clots, and the reported events of death and injuries following AstraZeneca shots.
The latest UK COVID-19 vaccine Oxford University/AstraZeneca analysis report:
- 4,625 Blood disorders including 5 deaths
- 5,798 Cardiac disorders including 86 deaths
- 76 Congenital disorders including 1 death
- 4,974 Ear disorders
- 138 Endocrine disorders
- 8,311 Eye disorders
- 58,521 Gastrointestinal disorders including 10 deaths
- 189,718 General disorders including 254 deaths
- 218 Hepatic disorders including 6 deaths
- 1,821 Immune system disorders including 1 death
- 11,621 Infections including 64 deaths
- 4,613 Injuries including 1 death
- 7,009 Investigations
- 6,652 Metabolic disorders including 4 deaths
- 70,573 Muscle & tissue disorders
- 162 Neoplasms including 3 deaths
- 124,324 Nervous system disorders including 115 deaths
- 102 Pregnancy conditions
- 10,792 Psychiatric disorders including 2 deaths
- 1,650 Renal & urinary disorders including 3 deaths
- 2,401 Reproductive & breast disorders
- 17,755 Respiratory disorders including 86 deaths
- 34,074 Skin disorders including 2 deaths
- 150 Social circumstances including 1 death
- 434 Surgical & medical procedures including 1 death
- 7,048Vascular disorders including 38 deaths
Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine Oxford University/AstraZenec vaccine: 685 deaths and 573,650 injuries.
The latest UK COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer- BioNTech vaccine analysis report:
- 5,071 Blood disorders including 1 death
- 1,901 Cardiac disorders including 47 deaths
- 13 Congenital disorders
- 1,719 Ear disorders
- 37 Endocrine disorders
- 2322 Eye disorders
- 15,608 Gastrointestinal disorders including 15 deaths
- 43,126 General disorders including 140 deaths
- 50 Hepatic disorders
- 807 Immune system disorders including 1 death
- 3,545 Infections including 60 deaths
- 1,094 Injuries including 2 deaths
- 1,721 Investigations including 1 death
- 939 Metabolic disorders including 1 death
- 19,716 Muscle & tissue disorders
- 77 Neoplasms including 1 death
- 27,949 Nervous system disorders including 32 deaths
- 86 Pregnancy conditions including 3 deaths
- 2427 Psychiatric disorders
- 394 Renal & urinary disorders including 2 deaths
- 1,012 Reproductive & breast disorders
- 6,271 Respiratory disorders including 33 deaths
- 10,937 Skin disorders including 1 death
- 47 Social circumstances
- 124 Surgical & medical procedures including 1 death
- 2,065 Vascular disorders including 6 deaths
Total reactions for the COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer- BioNTech vaccine: 347 deaths and 149,082 injuries
The latest (and first) COVID-19 vaccine Moderna vaccine analysis report:
- 9 Blood disorders
- 7 Cardiac disorders
- 11 Ear disorders
- 8 Eye disorders
- 57 Gastrointestinal disorders
- 199 General disorders including 1 death
- 1 Hepatic disorder
- 2 Immune system disorders
- 12 Infections
- 7 Injuries
- 8 Investigations
- 2 Metabolic disorders
- 90 Muscle & tissue disorders
- 128 Nervous system disorders including 1 death
- 13 Psychiatric disorders
- 2 Renal & urinary disorders
- 7 Reproductive & breast disorders
- 22 Respiratory disorders
- 68 Skin disorders
- 1 Surgical & medical procedure
- 6 Vascular disorders
Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine Moderna vaccine: 2 deaths and 660 injuries
Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine brand unspecified vaccines: 13 deaths and 1687 injuries.
The UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency concludes:
- Vaccines are the best way to protect people from Covid-19 and have already saved thousands of lives. Everyone should continue to get their vaccination when asked to do so unless specifically advised otherwise.
- As with all vaccines and medicines, the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is being continuously monitored .
- Cases of an extremely rare specific type of blood clot with low blood platelets continue to be investigated.
Comment on this article at HealthImpactNews.com.
Healthy Families Make A Healthy World!
Charlie Warzel is a weenie
New Substack writer from the NYT’s wants to continue to censor Trump supporters on Social Media
This article was cross posted on my Substack
I am enjoying the new platform Substack and have followed several people in the past few weeks, set up my own platform, and subscribed to Bari Weiss and Glenn Greenwald just to have the joy of commenting on their work.
I follow several progressive journalists every day on Twitter even though I was recently suspended from Twitter. I enjoy reading lefty journalist Twitter because they are a fun little hive mind constantly linking to each others work. They spend quite a bit of time attempting to debunk various things that I am passionate about, like freebirth and parental sovereignty around health care and education.
Most of them have written an article or two or ten trying to debunk Q. Since I have been a passionate Q blogger these articles and the continuing efforts to paint those of us who followed the drops for three years as violent crazies constitutes much of my dedicated time on the web.
I was interviewed on the phone by Will Sommer a few months ago. He spent the whole time chewing in my ear, which I found to be annoying and really unprofessional. Last night I listened to his report on a podcast about attending the Faith and Freedom conference in Oaklahoma. He reported:
“[It was] sort of a confluence of COVID denialism, QAnon, evangelical Christianity, all this kind of stuff, gathering outside of Tulsa, 4,500 people,” Sommer told co-host Asawin Suebsaeng on this week’s episode of The Daily Beast’s Fever Dreams podcast. “They were ready to throw down and talk about how much they love both Trump and QAnon, no masks, [of course]… I didn’t see a single mask… I, too, had to go sans mask to fit in.”
There were, naturally, “a lot of people who are big deals in Trumpism. I mean, it was Lin Wood, and Michael Flynn, and Sidney Powell. Jim Caviezel, who you may remember from The Passion of the Christ,” Sommer said. “These were people who were fringe in a way, but who still have a lot of sway in the Republican Party… Look, the chairman of the Oklahoma Republican Party was at this thing.”
I listened to the first twenty minutes of his Fever Dreams Podcast report to the other guys and it was really interesting hearing his take on what he experienced. As the guys on the cast tried to dismiss and mock what happened, Will kept explaining that five thousand cheering people were attending and they gave standing O’s to any mention of Q or Q issues like Child Trafficking.
Will wrongly talks about QAnon as if it is one entity. There was only Q and then thousands of Anons who engaged in a Socratic back and forth for three years in order to bypass the media gatekeepers, and then those of us who watched the exchange of information in real time. What Will did not theorize during the podcast was how many of us were watching the conference from home, very much aware of what was being said and discussed during Lin Woods Key notes and the casual drop about Adrenochrome by Jim Caviezel.
As Will discussed this particular part of the conference he and the guys he was talking to had a nervousness come into their voices as they were laughing and joking. I heard it and I bet you will hear it to if you listen to the podcast. Child Trafficking isn’t funny. And those of us who were watching from home were weeping, just thinking about the babes who are being saved right now by People like Tim Ballard and the people who are tied to Operation Underground Railroad, who Will also dissed during the podcast. You really can tell so much about a person based on who they hate and mock.
I was disgusted by the tone of the podcast and turned it off after listening for about twenty minutes.
Here is the trailer for the movie that Cazeviel is starring in.
And here is a chat with Tim Ballard himself with Jim. Why is the movie having a hard time being brought to the public?
What made the media go nuts last week was Jim mentioning Adrenochrome and how there would be no forgiveness for those who torture the little ones.
To be clear, there is a group of people who look at children and see food. And they think of babies as a source of energy for them. They will pay any amount of money to use the various products connected with dead children because they believe this is the way for them to experience longevity and health. Babies and children are also used as sacrifice during Satanic Rituals.
So, how does all of this connect to Charlie Warzel being a weenie?
In his recent substack post about censorship he asked if we could do better than simply deplatforming President Trump.
Putting my cards on the table, I think that Facebook is a better place without Donald Trump polluting it with garbage. After his election denial and the events of January 6th, I think there’s an extremely solid case for his permanent ban. But I also agree with Ovadya that we can have a more sophisticated conversation going forward around what we expect of world leaders online and how to make sure to hold them accountable before they destabilize our politics any further. Mostly though, I think conversations like this one are proof that we are still in the early days of understanding and governing the platforms. The limited array of enforcement options we have to balance speech and mitigate harms doesn’t feel adequate. I think we can, eventually, do better.
I responded to his post with this blog post and a short video heckling the crap out of him.
I said in the podcast that some of us have experienced the “friction” that comes with complete deplatforming up to and including having our voices permanently silenced because of being killed.
Charlie thinks the internet will be a better place if certain restrictions are put in place because he finds it a bit unnerving to have to move at the speed of Twitter. And we all know you cannot be a good reporter until the views you espouse have been poll tested and handed to you by your editor to maneuver into a readable article, which will then be massaged by your editor and viewed by a team of attorneys to make certain it is good enough for the Times. And that process takes a full seven days!
So how dare President Trump and his millions of supporters expect a professional like Charlie to have to keep his nose to the grindstone and be involved in real time politics the way that news junkies are. Don’t you know he needs time off to eat, drink, and be merry? And those gatekeeper editors need lots of time to figure out how to spin the news so that Charlie can write something great.
Sorry buddy, if you want to play on this playground you need to be up to speed on the issues of the day, with your opinions and thoughts all ready to roll or YOU will be steam rolled by the pace of the news business and the many nuances of indie journalism. Convincing people to eat their big bowl of blue pills every morning by not going down those Q rabbit holes while throwing rocks at Trump supporters is not going to be very popular, even for someone with your sterling resume’.
So stop being a weenie and encourage the social media companies to give all of us our channels back. I have been banned from Reddit, You Tube, Twitter, and Facebook. I would like to get my channels back. You could atone for your totalitarian instincts by working to help get my web footprint back. Then all Trump supporters and the big guy himself.
There are several million trafficked children who are going to need tender care in the coming months and years, we can all get around that and pitch in to help.
Jenny Marie Hatch
Healthy Families Make A Healthy World!
Dave Rubin Show with Paul Rossi on Critical Race Theory
https://www.instagram.com/p/COMq3UNhcWO/?igshid=1h0pauhqrqlm9
Dave Rubin talks to Paul Rossi, a whistleblower and math teacher at Grace Church School, about the NYC private school’s critical race theory curriculum that led him to publish “I Refuse to Stand By While My Students Are Indoctrinated” on the Substack of Bari Weiss.
In this clip Paul reveals the damage being done by critical race theory being forced onto young kids. Paul describes how critical race theory in education had been building slowly for years. Recently he had noticed the damaging effects it was having on his students by making them feel like they couldn’t have opinions that differed from the social justice orthodoxy. Young kids were made to feel guilt and shame over their alleged “white privilege”. He also describes the incident that made him decide to speak up and put his job at risk.
I Refuse to Stand By While My Students Are Indoctrinated
Children are afraid to challenge the repressive ideology that rules our school. That’s why I am.
Paul RossiApr 13
I am a teacher at Grace Church High School in Manhattan. Ten years ago, I changed careers when I discovered how rewarding it is to help young people explore the truth and beauty of mathematics. I love my work.
As a teacher, my first obligation is to my students. But right now, my school is asking me to embrace “antiracism” training and pedagogy that I believe is deeply harmful to them and to any person who seeks to nurture the virtues of curiosity, empathy and understanding.
“Antiracist” training sounds righteous, but it is the opposite of truth in advertising. It requires teachers like myself to treat students differently on the basis of race. Furthermore, in order to maintain a united front for our students, teachers at Grace are directed to confine our doubts about this pedagogical framework to conversations with an in-house “Office of Community Engagement” for whom every significant objection leads to a foregone conclusion. Any doubting students are likewise “challenged” to reframe their views to conform to this orthodoxy.
I know that by attaching my name to this I’m risking not only my current job but my career as an educator, since most schools, both public and private, are now captive to this backward ideology. But witnessing the harmful impact it has on children, I can’t stay silent.
My school, like so many others, induces students via shame and sophistry to identify primarily with their race before their individual identities are fully formed. Students are pressured to conform their opinions to those broadly associated with their race and gender and to minimize or dismiss individual experiences that don’t match those assumptions. The morally compromised status of “oppressor” is assigned to one group of students based on their immutable characteristics. In the meantime, dependency, resentment and moral superiority are cultivated in students considered “oppressed.”
All of this is done in the name of “equity,” but it is the opposite of fair. In reality, all of this reinforces the worst impulses we have as human beings: our tendency toward tribalism and sectarianism that a truly liberal education is meant to transcend.
Recently, I raised questions about this ideology at a mandatory, whites-only student and faculty Zoom meeting. (Such racially segregated sessions are now commonplace at my school.) It was a bait-and-switch “self-care” seminar that labelled “objectivity,” “individualism,” “fear of open conflict,” and even “a right to comfort” as characteristics of white supremacy. I doubted that these human attributes — many of them virtues reframed as vices — should be racialized in this way. In the Zoom chat, I also questioned whether one must define oneself in terms of a racial identity at all. My goal was to model for students that they should feel safe to question ideological assertions if they felt moved to do so.
It seemed like my questions broke the ice. Students and even a few teachers offered a broad range of questions and observations. Many students said it was a more productive and substantive discussion than they expected.
However, when my questions were shared outside this forum, violating the school norm of confidentiality, I was informed by the head of the high school that my philosophical challenges had caused “harm” to students, given that these topics were “life and death matters, about people’s flesh and blood and bone.” I was reprimanded for “acting like an independent agent of a set of principles or ideas or beliefs.” And I was told that by doing so, I failed to serve the “greater good and the higher truth.”
He further informed me that I had created “dissonance for vulnerable and unformed thinkers” and “neurological disturbance in students’ beings and systems.” The school’s director of studies added that my remarks could even constitute harassment.
A few days later, the head of school ordered all high school advisors to read a public reprimand of my conduct out loud to every student in the school. It was a surreal experience, walking the halls alone and hearing the words emitting from each classroom: “Events from last week compel us to underscore some aspects of our mission and share some thoughts about our community,” the statement began. “At independent schools, with their history of predominantly white populations, racism colludes with other forms of bias (sexism, classism, ableism and so much more) to undermine our stated ideals, and we must work hard to undo this history.”
Students from low-income families experience culture shock at our school. Racist incidents happen. And bias can influence relationships. All true. But addressing such problems with a call to “undo history” lacks any kind of limiting principle and pairs any allegation of bigotry with a priori guilt. My own contract for next year requires me to “participate in restorative practices designed by the Office of Community Engagement” in order to “heal my relationship with the students of color and other students in my classes.” The details of these practices remain unspecified until I agree to sign.
I asked my uncomfortable questions in the “self-care” meeting because I felt a duty to my students. I wanted to be a voice for the many students of different backgrounds who have approached me over the course of the past several years to express their frustration with indoctrination at our school, but are afraid to speak up.
They report that, in their classes and other discussions, they must never challenge any of the premises of our “antiracist” teachings, which are deeply informed by Critical Race Theory. These concerns are confirmed for me when I attend grade-level and all-school meetings about race or gender issues. There, I witness student after student sticking to a narrow script of acceptable responses. Teachers praise insights when they articulate the existing framework or expand it to apply to novel domains. Meantime, it is common for teachers to exhort students who remain silent that “we really need to hear from you.”
But what does speaking up mean in a context in which white students are asked to interrogate their “white saviorism,” but also “not make their antiracist practice about them”? We are compelling them to tiptoe through a minefield of double-binds. According to the school’s own standard for discursive violence, this constitutes abuse.
Every student at the school must also sign a “Student Life Agreement,” which requires them to aver that “the world as we understand it can be hard and extremely biased,” that they commit to “recognize and acknowledge their biases when we come to school, and interrupt those biases,” and accept that they will be “held accountable should they fall short of the agreement.” A recent faculty email chain received enthusiastic support for recommending that we “‘officially’ flag students” who appear “resistant” to the “culture we are trying to establish.”
When I questioned what form this resistance takes, examples presented by a colleague included “persisting with a colorblind ideology,” “suggesting that we treat everyone with respect,” “a belief in meritocracy,” and “just silence.” In a special assembly in February 2019, our head of school said that the impact of words and images perceived as racist — regardless of intent — is akin to “using a gun or a knife to kill or injure someone.”
Imagine being a young person in this environment. Would you risk voicing your doubts, especially if you had never heard a single teacher question it?
Last fall, juniors and seniors in my Art of Persuasion class expressed dismay with the “Grace bubble” and sought to engage with a wider range of political viewpoints. Since the BLM protests often came up in our discussions, I thought of assigning Glenn Loury, a Brown University professor and public intellectual whose writings express a nuanced, center-right position on racial issues in America. Unfortunately, my administration put the kibosh on my proposal.
The head of the high school responded to me that “people like Loury’s lived experience—and therefore his derived social philosophy” made him an exception to the rule that black thinkers acknowledge structural racism as the paramount impediment in society. He added that “the moment we are in institutionally and culturally, does not lend itself to dispassionate discussion and debate,” and discussing Loury’s ideas would “only confuse and/or enflame students, both those in the class and others that hear about it outside of the class.” He preferred I assign “mainstream white conservatives,” effectively denying black students the opportunity to hear from a black professor who holds views that diverge from the orthodoxy pushed on them.
I find it self-evidently racist to filter the dissemination of an idea based on the race of the person who espouses it. I find the claim that exposing 11th and 12th graders to diverse views on an important societal issue will only “confuse” them to be characteristic of a fundamentalist religion, not an educational philosophy.
My administration says that these constraints on discourse are necessary to shield students from harm. But it is clear to me that these constraints serve primarily to shield their ideology from harm — at the cost of students’ psychological and intellectual development.
It was out of concern for my students that I spoke out in the “self-care” meeting, and it is out of that same concern that I write today. I am concerned for students who crave a broader range of viewpoints in class. I am concerned for students trained in “race explicit” seminars to accept some opinions as gospel, while discarding as immoral disconfirming evidence. I am concerned for the dozens of students during my time at Grace who shared with me that they have been reproached by teachers for expressing views that are not aligned with the new ideology.
One current student paid me a visit a few weeks ago. He tapped faintly on my office door, anxiously looking both ways before entering. He said he had come to offer me words of support for speaking up at the meeting.
I thanked him for his comments, but asked him why he seemed so nervous. He told me he was worried that a particular teacher might notice this visit and “it would mean that I would get in trouble.” He reported to me that this teacher once gave him a lengthy “talking to” for voicing a conservative opinion in class. He then remembered with a sigh of relief that this teacher was absent that day. I looked him in the eyes. I told him he was a brave young man for coming to see me, and that he should be proud of that.
Then I sent him on his way. And I resolved to write this piece.
CORRECTION: The anecdote about Glenn Loury was originally attributed to the head of Grace Church School. In fact, those statements were made by the head of the high school. Apologies for the error.
