Bogus Science, sometimes I think it is ALL bogus…featuring two excellent articles by Homeopathic Guru Dana Ullman

April 21, 2010Jenny Marie Hatch

Natural Family BLOG, an online journal written by Jenny Hatch

I just completed my morning surf around the web.

Lots of interesting stuff going on.

3rd UPDATE:

Dana Ullman has posted the second follow up article at Huffington Post titled

Lies, Damn Lies, and Medical Research

Quote:

“Modern medicine uses the double-blind and placebo-controlled trial as the gold standard by which the effectiveness of a treatment is determined. On the surface, this scientific method is very reasonable. However, serious problems in these studies are widely acknowledged by academics but remain unknown to the general public. Fundamental questions about the meaning of the word “efficacy” are rarely raised.

For instance, just because a drug treatment seems to eliminate a specific symptom does not necessarily mean that it is “effective.” In fact, getting rid of a specific symptom can be the bad news. Aspirin may lower your fever, but physiologists recognize that fever is an important defense of the body in its efforts to fight infection. Sleep-inducing drugs may lead you to fall asleep, but they do not lead to refreshed sleep, and these drugs ultimately tend to aggravate the cycle of insomnia and fatigue, while conveniently (for the drug companies) tend to create addiction. Long-term safety and efficacy of many modern drugs for common ailments remains unknown, despite the high hopes and sincere expectations from the medical community and the rest of us for greater certainty.”

2nd Update:

Lawsuit is coming, and the Hide the Decline guys say BRING IT ON~!

UPDATE: Next Day

You Tube has pulled all of the Hide the Decline Vids from the site.

But Andrew Bribart has stepped up and posted the vid on his site.

Go Here to watch.

*The Global Elites are shaking in their boots…ha ha ha

Original Post

Was thrilled that the Hide the Decline guys remade their video after being threatened with a lawsuit by Climate Gates Michael Mann and forced to pull the old video off you Tube. Here is the remake, they are hoping to inspire a law suit with it by using Manns image.

One of the things that conservatives especially need to understand is that the same “scientists” who gave us bogus climate data are the same global elites tied to Big Pharma. They have wrapped the “irrefutable scientific peer reviewed evidence” around all of their research in an attempt to spew their chemicals all over the minds and bodies of the families of the world and it is the worst peer reviewed junk science that has ever been produced.

This recent article by Dana Ullman at Huff Po questions the science behind most of modern medicine.

“Doctors today commonly assert that they practice “scientific medicine,” and patients think that the medical treatments they receive are “scientifically proven.” However, this ideal is a dream, not reality, and a clever and profitable marketing ruse, not fact…”

…”Quackery” is commonly defined as the use of unproven treatments by individuals or companies who claim fantastic results and who charge large sums of money. Although modern physicians may point their collective finger at various “alternative” or “natural” treatment modalities as examples of quackery, it is conventional medical treatments today that are out-of-this-world expensive, and despite real questionable efficacy of their treatments, doctors give patients the guise of “science….”

…Big Pharma, Big Bucks, and the Guise of Science
Adherents of conventional medicine have consistently asserted that its methods are scientifically verified, and they have ridiculed other methods that are suggested to have therapeutic or curative effects. In fact, conventional physicians have consistently worked to disallow competitors, even viciously attacking those in their own profession who have questioned conventional treatments or provided alternative modalities. More recently, medical organizations simply work with insurance companies to help them determine what should and shouldn’t get reimbursed, a clever way to kill competition bloodlessly.

And yet, strangely enough, whatever has been in vogue in conventional medicine in one decade has been declared ineffective, dangerous and sometimes barbaric in the ensuing decades. Surprisingly, despite this pattern in history, proponents and defenders of “scientific medicine” tend to have little or no humility, continually asserting that today’s cure is truly effective … and in any case, strongly asserting that any “alternatives” to this ever-changing treatment are quackery, sheer quackery, whether they know anything about these alternative treatment modalities or not….”

Read the whole piece it is extremely enlightening.

Three areas of Modern Medicine are the most problematic for parents and children. They are Birth, Psychiatry, and Vaccines. These three modalities of healing contain some of the worst junk science in all of medicine. And ironically, they are the three main forms of Allopathy that are most revered and used by Families around the world.

The number one thing that hospitals do in this country is deliver babies. And with the statistics for surgical birth looking extremely grim, I believe we are on a trajectory with Birth where we could easily lose natural and normal birth in another generation or two.

The New York Times ran an article yesterday extolling the efforts of one New York hospital to implement policies that have lowered the C-section rate. (I often believe these types of articles are the elites tossing a bone to the activists working to normalize birth – they know how horrifying their statistics are and if they can claim a 23% c-section rate is a “good thing” it provides perfect cover, what some of us call, “Controlled opposition” to the status quo. It also manipulates the readers into thinking that something positive is going on when we have a C-section rate of 23%)

Staten Island University Hospital has kept its rate down to a 23% level and while I applaud the efforts of a pioneer like Mitchell A Maiman, as A birth activist I am appalled at any C-section rate over five percent.

Ideally the rate should be 3% and our society should be actively educating mothers on proper nutrition, natural birth, and how to nourish/birth a healthy baby without drugs, to reduce it even more. (Please note, with the current level of ignorance on the part of Young Mothers and the absolute addiction of our people to drugs, junk food, and mothers overextending themselves with excessive exercise and working/volunteering outside the home, I believe this will take several generations to accomplish.)

To my way of thinking the only rational reason for a woman to have a surgery to give birth would be if she was in an accident and the surgery would save her and the babe. Lifestyle choice on the part of the doctor or the mother would have NOTHING to do with it.

(*Please note the statistics used in this video are from 2007, the 2008 C-Section rates are even worse…)

From the article:

“Mother-demanded C-sections are unusual enough that the policy is probably more useful to Dr. Maiman for the message it sends to doctors and patients, a clear sign that he values a noninterventionist policy as long as it is safe. It has become common for hospitals to prohibit what are known as VBACs (for Vaginal Birth After Caesarean, pronounced VEE-back) for reasons having to do with anesthesia availability and, more tacitly, a fear of lawsuits. Dr. Maiman actively encourages VBACs. Residents are trained not only to avoid unnecessary C-sections, but to let higher-ups know if they witness another doctor about to perform one.

Obstetricians with high Caesarean rates, Dr. Maiman said, invite scrutiny; doctors either come to see things his way or end up leaving the hospital.

“If a woman has a third or a fourth Caesarean, the maternal morbidity and mortality is astronomically higher,” Dr. Maiman said. “That’s when you see women dying in childbirth from obstetrical hemorrhage.”

Whether or not you like his policy — maybe you believe a mother’s choice should extend to controlling the hour of her delivery and how much it will hurt — you have to give Dr. Maiman credit for not just creating protocols to protect women’s health, but enforcing them. There is not a lot of incentive for hospitals to let conviction trump convenience, especially when convenience comes with the added bonus of lower legal risk.”

The Medical Profession has a long history of controlling its own opposition, especially when it comes to Psychiatry and Vaccinations.

Leonard Horowitz has provided some of the best exposure on how the profession manipulates activists and controls the message they share. His article on the National Vaccine Information Centers ties to the industry is one of the best on the web.

QUOTE:

“By 1982, following 60-Minutes’s coverage of the deadly Swine Flu vaccine fiasco, and Marge Grant’s DPT appearance on national television, the “war” was turning against the drug industry. So Fisher and Schwartz were called upon to lobby with other pro-vaccinationists co-constructing the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Schwartz, the NVIC’s first President, had worked for “Mr. Health”—Florida Rep. Paul Rogers who led congress to advance the 1976 swine flu vaccination program. Rogers then crafted the legislation eliminating vaccine victim compensation. He was subsequently rewarded by the industry with a position on the board of directors of Merck, Sharp & Dohme, the world’s leading vaccine maker.”

Psychiatry presents the biggest boondoggle of them all – with record profits being noted all over the world. With the passage of The Mothers Act, which was embedded in the Obamacare Bill, it is now officially open season on the Mothers of America. The overwhelming junk science tied to the psychiatric drugging of our children and the mothers who care for them is so over the top fraudulent it is amazing that it just keeps chugging along…

As Amy Philo wrote in her article just after the bill was passed:

“What I soon found out is that Goliath was very frightened of our coalition. So they sent in their own wolf pack in the form of a few disgruntled mothers who presumed that they would successfully intimidate us into giving up. But we never did. Despite hurtful and hateful comments, personal attacks and lies, we continued on, growing our coalition to 54 national groups, over 13,250 public signatures and over 3,000 Facebook members. It’s difficult to count all of our supporters since word spreads fast online and people sometimes don’t even know where to find links to sign the petition even though they have written or called Congress.

I can’t even calculate the amount of money my husband spent on press releases, flights to DC, or the amount I have spent on incidentals just working to stop The MOTHERS Act. Countless radio shows and magazine, newspaper and TV interviews later, here we are in 2010 with The MOTHERS Act slipped into the Health Care Bill and passed with carte blanche approval from Democrats in the House after a tough fight in the Senate.

I find it ironic and funny to read on Katherine Stone’s and Susan Stone’s blogs a few posts congratulating each other for a job well done. All told several people are listed as getting all the credit for passing a bill that died every year in Congress for six years before passing the house in 2007 and being killed by our coalition in 2008. As you know, when the House of Reps passes something, sometimes all that they do is announce the name of the bill and its stated purpose and vote. Nobody wants to vote against something titled “The MOTHERS Act” though in reality it should be called “The Pharmaceutical Companies’ Dream For America Act” or maybe “The Axe The Mothers and Babies Act.”

I interviewed Amy on my Radio Show the day the Health Care Bill was signed into law by President Obama.

I would like to use this blog post to challenge anyone reading it to learn the facts about the drug companies. Learn the facts about birth, vaccines, and psychiatry. And then make those choices that will give ultimate health and wellness to your family.

Jenny Hatch

More Here

“Statistics the Semantics of Research” according to Gwen Olsen author of the book, Confessions of an ex drug pusher.

Citizens Commission on Human Rights

November 21, 2009Jenny Marie Hatch Leave a comment

CCHR Update on Senate Health Care Reform Bill

There are dozens of organizations that are objecting to provisions in the health care reform bills. As the primary mental health watchdog organization, CCHR has been hard at work identifying the specific mental health provisions in these bills so we can inform the public of the very real risks of various aspects of these bills that clearly are designed to benefit the psycho/pharmaceutical industry, but not the general public.

Conservatives are missing a potential motive…

November 10, 2009Jenny Marie Hatch Leave a comment

Nidel Malik Hassan

I’ve been over at Free Republic surfing around to get a feel for what everyone is thinking and typically, no one is talking about the FACT that this shooter was a psychiatrist and how that alone may have triggered the rampage.

Cal Thomas said this morning:

By now, the script should be disturbingly familiar. Whether in the Middle East, or increasingly in America, a fanatical Muslim blows up or goes on a shooting spree, killing many. This is quickly followed by “condemnations” from “Muslim civil rights groups,” like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). We are then warned by the president and some newspaper editorials not to jump to conclusions, or to stereotype. Yasser Arafat wrote this script, which he used with great success throughout his bloody career as a terrorist.

My “Knee jerk reaction” to any mass shooting is this:

What Anti-depressant was the shooter taking, how big was the dose, did they recently stop taking the meds? And/or did they change the prescription or recently add a second medication to the cocktail?

This is a side to the crime that should be fully explored and reported.

I agree that his religion, ideology, and overall worldview contributed to the murders, but we have to have some honest conversation about psychiatric meds and the effect they have on those who take them.

Psychiatry Industry Of Death

October 26, 2009Jenny Marie Hatch

Jenny Hatch with Baby Allison in 1992
Email
Click on the image to get to the Natural Family BLOG
function fbs_click() {u=location.href;t=document.title;window.open(‘http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=’+encodeURIComponent(u)+’&t=’+encodeURIComponent(t),’sharer’,’toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436′);return false;} html .fb_share_link { padding:2px 0 0 20px; height:16px; background:url(http://b.static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/zAB5S/hash/4273uaqa.gif) no-repeat top left; }<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=” onclick=”return fbs_click()” target=”_blank” class=”fb_share_link”>Share on Facebook
NEW! Blogger Account for twitter updates and links!

Watch our new video, CCHR: What We Believe

October 9, 2009Jenny Marie Hatch

Mental Health Declaration of Human Rights
A. The right to full informed consent; including:
1. The scientific/medical test confirming any alleged diagnoses of psychiatric disorder.
2. Full disclosure of all documented risks of any proposed drug or “treatment”.
3. The right to be informed of all available medical treatments which do not include the administration of a psychiatric drug or treatment.
4. The right to refuse any treatment the patient considers harmful.
B. No person shall be given psychiatric or psychological treatment against his or her will.
C. No person, man, woman or child, may be denied his or her personal liberty by reason of mental illness, so-called, without a fair jury trial by laymen and with proper legal representation.
D. No person shall be admitted to or held in a psychiatric institution, hospital or facility because of their political, religious or cultural beliefs and practices.
E. Any patient has:
1. The right to be treated with dignity as a human being;
2. The right to hospital amenities without distinction as to race, color, sex, language, religion, political opinion, social origin or status by right of birth or property.
3. The right to have a thorough, physical and clinical examination by a competent registered general practitioner of one’s choice, to ensure that one’s mental condition is not caused by any undetected and untreated physical illness, injury or defect, and the right to seek a second medical opinion of one’s choice.
4. The right to fully equipped medical facilities and appropriately trained medical staff in hospitals, so that competent physical, clinical examinations can be performed.
5. The right to choose the kind or type of therapy to be employed, and the right to discuss this with a general practitioner, healer or minister of one’s choice.
6. The right to have all the side effects of any offered treatment made clear and understandable to the patient, in written form and in the patient’s native language.
7. The right to accept or refuse treatment but in particular, the right to refuse sterilization, electroshock treatment, insulin shock, lobotomy (or any other psychosurgical brain operation), aversion therapy, narcotherapy, deep sleep therapy and any drugs producing unwanted side effects.
8. The right to make official complaints, without reprisal, to an independent board which is composed of non-psychiatric personnel, lawyers and lay people. Complaints may encompass any torturous, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment received while under psychiatric care.
9. The right to have private counsel with a legal advisor and to take legal action.
10. The right to discharge oneself at any time and to be discharged without restriction, having committed no offense.
11. The right to manage one’s own property and affairs with a legal advisor, if necessary, or if deemed incompetent by a court of law, to have a State appointed executor to manage such until one is adjudicated competent. Such executor is accountable to the patient’s next of kin, or legal advisor or guardian.
12. The right to see and possess one’s hospital records and to take legal action with regard to any false information contained therein which may be damaging to one’s reputation.
13. The right to take criminal action, with the full assistance of law enforcement agents, against any psychiatrist, psychologist or hospital staff for any abuse, false imprisonment, assault from treatment, sexual abuse or rape, or any violation of mental health or other law. And the right to a mental health law that does not indemnify or modify the penalties for criminal, abusive or negligent treatment of patients committed by any psychiatrist, psychologist or hospital staff.
14. The right to sue psychiatrists, their associations and colleges, the institution, or staff for unlawful detention, false reports, or damaging treatment.
15. The right to work or to refuse to work, and the right to receive just compensation on a pay-scale comparable to union or state/national wages for similar work, for any work performed while hospitalized.
16. The right to education or training so as to enable one better to earn a living when discharged, the right of choice over what kind of education or training is received.
17. The right to receive visitors and a minister of one’s own faith.
18. The right to make and receive telephone calls and the right to privacy with regard to all personal correspondence to and from anyone.
19. The right to freely associate or not with any group or person in a psychiatric institution, hospital or facility.
20. The right to a safe environment without having in the environment, persons placed there for criminal reasons.
21. The right to be with others of one’s own age group.
22. The right to wear personal clothing, to have personal effects and to have a secure place in which to keep them.
23. The right to daily physical exercise in the open.
24. The right to a proper diet and nutrition and to three meals a day.
25. The right to hygienic conditions and non-overcrowded facilities, and to sufficient, undisturbed leisure and rest.

Jenny%20with%20Michelle%20For%20blog.JPG

Jenny Hatch with Baby Michelle in 1988
Email
Click on the image to get to the Natural Family BLOG
function fbs_click() {u=location.href;t=document.title;window.open(‘http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=’+encodeURIComponent(u)+’&t=’+encodeURIComponent(t),’sharer’,’toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436′);return false;} html .fb_share_link { padding:2px 0 0 20px; height:16px; background:url(http://b.static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/zAB5S/hash/4273uaqa.gif) no-repeat top left; }<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=” onclick=”return fbs_click()” target=”_blank” class=”fb_share_link”>Share on Facebook
NEW! Blogger Account for twitter updates and links!