Mask Debate rages on while MIT researchers make a few startling discoveries about anti-maskers @JennyHatch

https://www.instagram.com/p/COvfpXBhGPI/?igshid=17poo9v3arf01

MIT researchers ‘infiltrated’ a Covid skeptics community a few months ago and found that skeptics place a high premium on data analysis and empiricism.

“Most fundamentally, the groups we studied believe that science is a process, and not an institution.”

“Indeed, anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naïve realism about the “objective” truth of public health data.”

Link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.07993.pdf

“In other words, anti-maskers value unmediated access to information and privilege personal research and direct reading over “expert” interpretations.

“Its members value individual initiative and ingenuity, trusting scientific analysis only insofar as they can replicate it themselves by accessing and manipulating the data firsthand.

“They are highly reflexive about the inherently biased nature of any analysis, and resent what they view as the arrogant self-righteousness of scientific elites.”

“Many of the users believe that the most important metrics are missing from government-released data.”

“One user wrote: ‘Coding data is a big deal—and those definitions should be offered transparently by every state. Without a national guideline—we are left with this mess’.”

“The lack of transparency within these data collection systems—which many of these users infer as a lack of honesty—erodes these users’ trust within both government institutions and the datasets they release.”

“In fact, there are multiple threads every week where users debate how representative the data are of the population given the increased rate of testing across many states.”

“These groups argue that the conflation of asymptomatic and symptomatic cases therefore makes it difficult for anyone to actually determine the severity of the pandemic.”

“For these anti-mask users, their approach to the pandemic is grounded in more scientific rigor, not less.”

“These individuals as a whole are extremely willing to help others who have trouble interpreting graphs with multiple forms of clarification: by helping people find the original sources so that they can replicate the analysis themselves, by referencing other reputable studies…that come to the same conclusions, by reminding others to remain vigilant about the limitations of the data, and by answering questions about the implications of a specific graph.”

“While these groups highly value scientific expertise, they also see collective analysis of data as a way to bring communities together within a time of crisis, and being able to transparently and dispassionately analyze the data is crucial for democratic governance.”

“In fact, the explicit motivation for many of these followers is to find information so that they can make the best decisions for their families—and by extension, for the communities around them.”

“The message that runs through these threads is unequivocal: that data is the only way to set fear-bound politicians straight, and using better data is a surefire way towards creating a safer community.”

“Data literacy is a quintessential criterion for membership within the community they have created.”

“Arguing anti-maskers need more scientific literacy is to characterize their approach as uninformed & inexplicably extreme. This study shows the opposite: they are deeply invested in forms of critique & knowledge production they recognize as markers of scientific expertise“

“We argue that anti-maskers’ deep story draws from similar wells of resentment, but adds a particular emphasis on the usurpation of scientific knowledge by a paternalistic, condescending elite that expects intellectual subservience rather than critical thinking from the public.”

“And yet in the conclusion they lament “the skeptical impulse that the ‘science simply isn’t settled,’ prompting people to simply ‘think for themselves” to horrifying ends.”

They then compare it to the January 6 Capitol riot.

Bizarre and fascinating document.

Cheers!
Jenny Marie Hatch

Unmothering, the US Census, and Antinatalism @JennyHatch

Usually I enjoy reading Mona at the Feminist Giant. She is out kicking trash every day for women all around the world.

She is fearless about confronting injustices in places that few Americans even know about, much less think about. I subscribe to her Substack because I want to hear the stories of those who are suffering real aggression rather than the micro aggressions that American Women are always complaining about. I am an anti-feminist, but I recognize the contribution of the Emma Goldmans of our day and I thought Mona was one of them.

When I opened her recent email blast titled Unmothering, I was shocked to read the words that she had penned.

I am childfree by choice.

My paternal grandmother had eight children. My maternal grandmother had 11 children (she was pregnant 14 times). My mother is the eldest of those children and she has three children of her own. I am the eldest of those children and I am glad to have none of my own.

It is still a taboo to say that.

I vowed to myself at 16 that I would never allow myself to be in a situation that I could not walk away from. The year before, my family had moved to Saudi Arabia where, as soon as we moved there, I felt like I had been sentenced to a lifetime in prison. There, I was traumatized into feminism. There, I promised myself that I would always be free enough to be  able to walk away anytime because being in Saudi Arabia was so suffocating and stifling. Without actually saying “I’m never going to have children” — without thinking about children at all — I had already vowed to myself not to have children.

As I read her screed I felt this increasing sense of unreality. And as she finished with these complete contradictions, I just felt sad.

If I had a child, it would be a daughter so that I could tell her about my lovers. She would hate it, I am sure. But we would slay shame and taboos and I would kick her out into the world with the exhortation: LIVE.

So, because I am childfree by choice, I will instead tell my unmothered daughter about my lovers and we would slay shame and taboos in a book I am writing: Feminist Giant’s Guide To Losing Your Virginity.

If I had a daughter, I would have taught her to disobey everything I taught her. I wrote this poem for her.

To My Unborn Daughter

I would not have known how to love you.

I would have taught you to be too big to be a wife.

I would have taught you to disobey everything I taught you.

What could I teach you when I’m still unlearning everything I was taught?

The revolution came too late for you, my love;

I fight for your unborn daughter.

Mona and I are both fifty three years old. As I am looking forward to a small family gathering in a couple weeks where we will meet our new grandson, Mona is writing a book for girls to learn how to ruin their lives and any chance for permanent happiness.

Perhaps the truth is in her poem where if she taught her daughter to be sexually promiscuous, and then charged her with disobeying everything she had taught her, perhaps she really would want a daughter who knew better than to trade her body for money, status, war stories, or whatever token of bravery is the current wage being paid to feminist activists.

I am ALL IN with women taking control of their fertility, their lives, their hopes, dreams, and manifesting that reality with hard work and common sense, but I cannot go to the dark and dreary place where Mona appears to sit so comfortably and I would defy her at every turn if she were to attempt to come into my life and try to teach the women who I have gestated and nurtured into sexual deviants.

There is almost no happiness in the realm where she currently resides. And one day she will stand accountable before God for all of the young people she influenced and taught to cheat on their forever loves. When a person engages in sexual conduct with anyone to whom they are not legally and lawfully wedded, a series of tragic and horrifying events begin to happen. Sexual organs that are abused have a tendency to fill with cancer, shrivel up, and fall off the body. Mental Illness often accompanies these behaviors and the never ending circling of STD’s, unwanted pregnancies, and true loves betrayal begins to churn.

Mona, I want to call you to repentance. Repent of your sins, come unto Jesus Christ and be perfected in Him. Then make amends to the woman you have seduced with your awful ideas of what it means to be a woman and help them to hold on to their virginity as the most precious and sacred possession they own.

If you teach them to fling it away into the darkness, the pool of endless torment waiting for you in the afterlife just grows bigger.  You can find peace in this life with repentance. But there will be no peace for you now or forever if you persist in teaching this evil to the young people in your sphere of influence.

When the census came out last month there were a series of articles lamenting the demographics of birth, which is in steep decline in America.

While the left tends to blame this on a lack of Euro style social programs, I always look to the birth machine as the culprit. Birth in America is so overpriced and crazy dangerous, that it is a wonder our moms and babes do as well as they do. Economics are a huge factor in whey young people are not having babies.  Many of them are infertile and desperate to have a child.  And others are so freaked out with the idea of climate change that they believe it is selfish to give a child life.

When thinking about the long term ramifications of the decline of the west because we are not reproducing ourselves, I think about those activists who in the early part of the twentieth century determined that babies needed to be culled from society. These Eugenists set out to make parenting as expensive, difficult, fraught with danger and difficulty and something only rich people could do.

The work on my blog is dedicated to teaching couples the skills they will need and the lifestyle they can choose to live if they want to raise a healthy family on one income.

I pray as the Antinatalists and feminists continue to attempt to brainwash our children, that those who are wise will stand up to the lies and nonsense and gift our young people, especially our daughters with the pathway to happiness which is most likely to be achieved by getting married and having a family.

How many women out there right now would gladly hand in their PhD for a houseful of children?

Jenny Marie Hatch PhDMH

 

 

Video of the Day! Gain of Function @JennyHatch

Click to Watch!

Dr. Rand Paul finally asks Fauci to his face — ‘Did the NIH fund gain of function research at Wuhan bio-lab!’

Gain of Function – Exclusive Investigation: Separating rumor from fact on Covid-19’s origin by Sharyl Attkissin (FULL VIDEO)

Sharyl Attkisson investigates Covid-19 origins

  • Numerous scientific insiders are signing onto the “lab origin” theory for Covid-19 and a link to controversial research funded by your tax dollars.
  • High profile health figures who have worked to “debunk” lab origin questions are linked to funding and vaccine research partnerships with China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
  • The U.S.- Chinese research involved genetically engineering bat coronavirus to make it infect human airway cells in mice, in order to invent vaccines and other therapeutics.
  • U.S. taxpayer money supported the controversial vaccine research with Chinese scientists through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Some support came from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), led by Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Transcript with additional info. Clean transcript without additional info is here.

When the former head of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Dr. Robert Redfield, recently said Covid-19 likely leaked from a Chinese research lab, news headlines called it “shocking.” 

Dr. Robert Redfield on CNN: “I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory— you know, escaped.”

That was followed by a flurry of media reports ridiculing the notion; insisting that Covid-19 probably jumped from bats to people through an unexplained, natural route. But there’s new information that hasn’t been widely reported. A sizable segment of the research community has formed the same opinion as Dr. Redfield: that Covid-19 leaked from experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. 

Jamie Metzl, World Health Organization International Advisory Committee on Human Genome Editing: “There are scientists all around the world who have told me that they believe the most likely origin of COVID-19, of the pandemic, is an accidental lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Jamie Metzl is a member of the World Health Organization International Advisory Committee on Human Genome Editing.

Read the whole thing HERE!

Click to Donate…
Click to Watch!

Emerald Robinson and Ben Collins tit for tat on Twitter #Wuhan @JennyHatch

Fun little exchange on the heels of Emeralds question at the presser…plus a few tweets from Emeralds Wall on Twitter.

Jenny Marie Hatch

https://twitter.com/ccpecknold/status/1390701514939895811?s=20

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1390975010068705282?s=20