CDC Reports 2 More Infant DEATHS Following Experimental COVID Injections During Clinical Trials @JennyHatch

The CDC released more data in their Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) today, and it included two new deaths of infants age 2 and age 1.

While none of the COVID injections have emergency use authorization for children under the age of 17 yet, there are ongoing trials with children being injected with the experimental shots as young as 6 months old.

One of the infants who died was apparently in a Pfizer trial, while the other one was apparently in a Moderna trial.

VAERS ID 1255745 involved a 2-year-old baby girl in Virginia who died 5 days after she was injected. The VAERS entry appears to be made by a family member who laments that the childโ€™s death โ€œwas going to happen anyway,โ€ apparently repeating what health officials were telling them, and that they would probably claim her death โ€œhad nothing to do with the shot.โ€

VAERS ID: 1255745 โ€“ Pfizer

Symptoms: Death, Product administered to patient of inappropriate age

SMQs:, Medication errors (narrow)

Write-up: she was going to die/dies after vaccine; 2-year-old patient; This is a spontaneous report from a non-contactable consumer via a Pfizer-sponsored program.

A 2-year-old female patient received bnt162b2 (PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE), second dose at the age of 2-years-old via an unspecified route of administration on 25Feb2021 (Batch/Lot number was not reported) as single dose for covid-19 immunisation.

The patientโ€s medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. It was reported that the 2-year-old dies after vaccine on 03Mar2021. Reported on VAERS.

Look for the researchers to exclude her from the study, probably claiming her death had nothing to do with the shot, she was going to die that day, five days after vaccination anyway.

Thatโ€s how they roll. The patient died on 03Mar2021. The outcome of the event was fatal. No follow-up attempts are possible. Information on lot/batch cannot be obtained. No further information is expected.; Reported Cause(s) of Death: she was going to die

VAERS ID 1261766 involved a year-old baby boy in Florida who suffered convulsions and seizures after the Moderna shot and died 2 days later.

VAERS ID: 1261766 โ€“ Moderna

Symptoms: Body temperature increased, Death, Seizure

SMQs:, Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (broad), Systemic lupus erythematosus (broad), Convulsions (narrow), Noninfectious encephalitis (broad), Noninfectious encephalopathy/delirium (broad), Noninfectious meningitis (broad), Generalised convulsive seizures following immunisation (narrow), Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome (broad), Hypoglycaemia (broad)

Write-up: increased body temperature, seizure, death

TV Doctor Puts 5-Year-Old and 7-Year-Old Children on TV After Participating in Duke Pfizer Trial for Children Age 5 to 11

I canโ€™t even imagine what it takes to convince parents of young children to allow their children to be guinea pigs for a vaccine trial.

In what looks more like a publicity stunt to convince parents and children to sign up for the experimental COVID shots, Dr. Cameron Wolfe, an infectious disease specialist at Duke University who makes regular appearances on WRAL-TV talking about COVID, brought his two children on TV to show how they got the experimental shots and are now โ€œfeeling great and full of energy.โ€

A clinical trial at the Duke University Health System is currently studying its use on ages 5 to 11.

WRAL News spoke with two young boys who are excited to be part of that trial.

Their father is someone who has become familiar in the Triangle during the pandemic. Dr. Cameron Wolfe, infectious disease specialist at Duke, makes regular appearances on WRAL-TV talking about COVID.

He and his wife, who is also a doctor, hope sharing their story about their kids getting the vaccine will encourage other parents about the vaccineโ€™s safety.

Wolfe tweeted photos of his boys getting their second doses of the Pfizer vaccine on Monday.

Drs. Sarah and Cameron Wolfe said they had no reservations about their 5-year-old Lachlan and 7-year-old Callum joining the Duke trial for kids ages 5 to 11.

โ€œI think it was an easy choice to get the vaccine, and early,โ€ said Sarah. โ€œWe were going to have peace of mind for caregivers, teachers, and the kids they interact with in school that we were adding safety.โ€

And the kids were eager to get the shots.

โ€œI thought it would protect me. And also stop me from spreading it โ€“ protecting me, and protecting everyone else,โ€ said Callum. โ€œAnd the scientists would get to know if it works on kids also.โ€

After getting the vaccine, both kids seem to be feeling great โ€“ and full of energy.

When asked what he would tell other kids about the vaccine, 7-year-old Callum said, โ€œWell, that you should do it. Because then youโ€™ll be safe and youโ€™ll be protecting everyone else around you.โ€

His father agrees with him, pointing out that if enough school children get vaccinated, the community can get closer to herd immunity level.

Unlike some of the adult trials where you might get placebo, everyone gets the real shot in this trial. Health officials are looking at dose level and how much to give.

As far as a timeline โ€” Pfizer expects to have approval from the FDA for kids as young as 2 by this fall. (Full story.)

The corporate media, the government health agencies, and the pharmaceutical companies for many months now have been conditioning the public to always expect serious side-effects to these shots, and that when they become seriously ill after an injection, that this is โ€œproofโ€ that the shots work.

And this kind of propaganda works, if one just spends a few minutes on social media reading about peopleโ€™s reactions.

So if this is the โ€œlogicโ€ that convinces people to just accept side effects as โ€œproofโ€ the shots โ€œare working,โ€ what does it mean when there are no side effects (other than maybe injection site temporary pain) and are reported โ€œto be feeling great โ€“ and full of energyโ€?

Was this just a publicity stunt to get more parents and children to sign up for the trials?

For the baby girl in Virginia and the baby boy in Florida who participated in these COVID โ€œvaccineโ€ trials and were added to VAERS, they are not โ€œfeeling great and full of energy.โ€

Theyโ€™re dead.

They are now just a number, a statistic, to be added to the other 4000+ unprecedented deaths that have been recorded by the CDC following non-FDA approved COVID shots during the last 4 months.

And earlier this week it was announced that Pfizer has requested the โ€œemergency useโ€ authorization on their COVID shot to be fully approved by the FDA, which would open the door to making them mandatory.

Comment on this article at HealthImpactNews.com.

Sins of the Fathers @JennyHatch

How Many Americans have DIED after taking COVID VACCINE? Tucker Carlson COMPLETE VIDEO/TRANSCRIPT @JennyHatch

Tucker Carlson Opening Statement


TRANSCRIPT

How many Americans have died after taking the Covid vaccine?

Tucker part 1
Tucker Part 2
Tucker Part 3

How many Americans have died after taking the COVID vaccines? Not Americans whoโ€™ve been killed by the virus, thatโ€™s a huge number, but how many Americans have died after getting the vaccines designed to prevent the virus? Do you know the answer to that question? Do you know anything about the downside? We know a lot about the upside of the vaccine. Weโ€™ve been completely in favor of vulnerable people taking vaccines.

But what about the potential risks? Youโ€™d think you would know more about that than you do. We talk about vaccines constantly, not just on this show, but in this country. Joe Biden was on TV yesterday talking about vaccines. He wants you to get one. Everyone in authority wants you to get one. In fact, youโ€™ve probably already had your shot, and good for you. If you havenโ€™t had your shot, youโ€™re under enormous pressure to get your shot.

You understand that soon you may not be able to fly on commercial airplanes or go to work at the office or send your children to school if you donโ€™t have the shot. Meanwhile, the social pressure is enormous. Friends may have already informed you that youโ€™re not welcome at their parties or weddings if you havenโ€™t been vaccinated. There is a lot of pressure to comply. At some point, you probably will comply. Itโ€™s just too difficult not be to vaccinated in this country.

But before you make the appointment: do you know anything about the potential risks? Probably you donโ€™t know much. We all assume the risks are negligible. Vaccines arenโ€™t dangerous. Thatโ€™s not a guess, we know that pretty conclusively from the official numbers. Every flu season, we give influenza shots to more than 160 million Americans. Every year, a relatively small number of people seem to die after getting those shots. To be precise, in 2019, that number was 203 people. The year before, it was 119. In 2017, a total of 85 people died from the flu shot.

Every death is tragic, but big picture, we donโ€™t consider those numbers disqualifying. We keep giving flu shots, and very few people complain about it. So the question is how do those numbers compare to the death rate from the coronavirus vaccines now being distributed across the country? Thatโ€™s worth knowing.

We checked today. Hereโ€™s the answer, which comes from the same set of government numbers that we just listed: Between late December of 2020, and last month, a total of 3,362 people apparently died after getting the COVID vaccines in the United States. Three thousand, three hundred and sixty-two โ€” thatโ€™s an average of 30 people every day. So, what does that add up to?

By the way, that reporting period ended on April 23. We donโ€™t have numbers past that, weโ€™re not quite up to date. But we can assume that another 360 people have died in the 12 days since. That is a total of 3,722 deaths. Almost four thousand people died after getting the COVID vaccines. The actual number is almost certainly much higher than that โ€” perhaps vastly higher.

The data we just cited come from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System โ€” VAERS โ€” which is managed by the CDC and the FDA. VARES has received a lot of criticism over the years, some of it founded. Some critics have argued for a long time that VARES undercounts vaccine injuries. A report submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services in 2010 concluded that โ€œfewer than one percent of vaccine adverse events are reportedโ€ by the VARES system. Fewer than one percent.

So what is the real number of people who apparently have been killed or injured by the vaccine? Well, we donโ€™t know that number. Nobody does, and weโ€™re not going to speculate about it. But itโ€™s clear that what is happening now, for whatever reason, is not even close to normal. Itโ€™s not even close to what weโ€™ve seen in previous years with previous vaccines.

Most vaccines are not accused of killing large numbers of people. The Menveo vaccine, for example, is given to people around the world, often children, to prevent bacterial meningitis. In this country, only one person died from that vaccine in the entire period between 2010 and 2015. One. So, compare that to whatโ€™s happening now. In just the first four months of this year, the U.S. government has recorded more deaths after COVID vaccinations than from all other vaccines administered in the United States between mid-1997 and the end of 2013. Thatโ€™s a period of fifteen and a half years.

Again, more people, according to VAERS, have died after getting the shot in four months during a single vaccination campaign than from all other vaccines combined over more than a decade and a half. Chart that out. Itโ€™s a stunning picture. Now, the debate is over what it means. Again, thereโ€™s a lot of criticism of the reporting system.

Some people say โ€œwell, itโ€™s just a coincidence that someone gets the shot and then dies, possibly from other causes.โ€ No one really knows, is the truth. We spoke to one physician today who actively treats COVID patients. He described what weโ€™re seeing now as the single deadliest mass-vaccination event in modern history. Whatever is causing it, it is happening as we speak. So youโ€™d think someone in authority might want to know whatโ€™s going on.

If the vaccine injury reporting system is flawed โ€” and it clearly is flawed โ€” why hasnโ€™t it been fixed? And more to the point, why has there not been an independent vaccine safety board to assess whatโ€™s happening. And reassure people who stumble across official government numbers on the internet. But amazingly, none of that has been done. No one even mentions the numbers. And in fact, youโ€™re not allowed to. Youโ€™ll be pulled off the internet if you do. The people in charge do not acknowledge them. Instead, they warn us about what might happen if we donโ€™t take the vaccine.

โ€œPeople who are not fully vaccinated can still die every day from COVID -19,โ€ Biden said. As a factual matter, that is true. But itโ€™s also misleading. Not all Americans are at a similar risk of dying from COVID-19. Some are at relatively high risk: the old and the sick. They might want to get vaccinated, and most do. Some are at very low risk of dying: the young and the healthy. Others appear to be at essentially no risk at all: anyone whoโ€™s had COVID and recovered.

Virtually all of those people are immune. Thatโ€™s true for many viruses. Those second two categories โ€” the young and healthy, and the previously infected โ€” may add up to hundreds of millions of people in this country. The funny thing is, the White House โ€“ the official policy-makers who are designing the vaccine rollout โ€“ do not acknowledge that those categories even exist.

Health Authorities are pretending that everyoneโ€™s health and risk potential is exactly the same as everyone elseโ€™s. Thatโ€™s why Joe Biden has demanded that 70 percent of all American adults โ€” regardless of age, regardless of health condition, regardless of pre-existing antibodies โ€” get the COVID shot by the Fourth of July two months from now, or else.

This might be an acceptable policy โ€“ it would never be an ethical policy โ€“ but it might be acceptable to the country if COVID vaccines we could show conclusively came with no risk, and if we truly understood the long-term effects of those vaccines. But neither one of those things is true. We know that according to the government reporting system, thousands of people have died after getting the shot. That is true in this country, where itโ€™s hotly debated when itโ€™s talked about at all, but itโ€™s also true in European countries, whose record-keeping is, if anything, more reliable than ours.

Many thousands of other people appear to have been injured after getting the vaccine. VAERS records nearly 900 non-fatal heart attacks in people who just received the shot. 2,700 people reported unexplained chest pain. In all, the vaccine, according to the government reporting system, appears to have contributed to at least 8,000 hospitalizations.

Some of the side effects defy explanation. Researcher Alex Berenson has noted that coronavirus vaccines now account for almost one-third of all tinnitus reports in the VAERS database. Thatโ€™s the ringing in your ears. The American Tinnitus Association says itโ€™s received โ€œmany questionsโ€ on the link.

Researchers at Oxford and UCLA have begun tracking coronavirus vaccine side effects across eight separate countries. They found, that โ€œWomen aged 18 to 34 years had a higher rate of deep vein thrombosis than men of the same age.โ€ They also found that heart attacks were โ€œcommonโ€ in people aged 85 and older who had taken the vaccine. They found serious potential side effects in some children, โ€œanaphylaxis [and] appendicitis were more common in young people.โ€

Vaccines are complicated medicines, and as with any drug, it can take a long time to get it precisely right. The dosage, for example. And this is not the first time people have been hurt during a vaccination campaign. That is bound to happen. Whatโ€™s different this time, and so striking, is the reaction to these numbers. Hereโ€™s a contrast for you: in 1976, the U.S. government vaccinated 45 million people with a vaccine for the swine flu. Fifty-three people reportedly died after getting that shot. The U.S. government immediately halted the vaccination program. Authorities decided it was too risky, it wasnโ€™t worth it.

Contrast that with what is happening now. This time, our health authorities have reserved their energy for anyone who dares to question vaccines. LifeSiteNews, a nonprofit news organization, just found itself permanently banned from Facebook. Why? Because it reported government numbers from the VAERS database.

When Joe Rogan asked whether healthy young people ought to get the vaccine, the media treated him like a criminal.

Almost everything they said was a lie that obscured a very simple and potentially relevant question that he asked, which is: should healthy young people receive the vaccine? Weโ€™re not precisely sure what the risks are. It is a lie to say there are no risks. There are risks in everything, including in getting a vaccine. So why not rationally weigh the risk/reward ratio, as we do with every decision we make. For that, he was denounced as an anti-vaxxer kook. A danger to public safety.

One of the very few elected officials in the country who has said a word about any of this, who has asked the obvious questions, not attacking vaccines, wondering about their effects, is Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. Last week, Johnson asked Francis Collins, the director of the NIH, why so many Americans seem to be dying after the shot.

Maybe thereโ€™s a good answer for that, Collins wouldnโ€™t even acknowledge that was happening. Instead, Collins fretted if the population focused too much on the harm from vaccines, people might be hesitant to get them.

โ€œI challenged his use of the term โ€˜Vaccine Hesitancy,โ€™โ€ Ron Johnson told us in a conversation today. โ€œI told him that based on the VAERS deaths, and my conversations with people who have chosen not to get vaccinated, a better description would be: โ€˜People who are hesitant to be coerced into participating in the largest drug trial in history.โ€™โ€

Exactly. Thereโ€™s a reason many states have more vaccine doses than they can use. Some people just donโ€™t want the vaccine. Thatโ€™s their right. Period. Not all of them are crazy. Health decisions used to be considered personal choices. We didnโ€™t ask about them. They were considered personal as recently as last fall. In September of 2020, at the height of the presidential campaign, a CNN reporter asked Kamala Harris whether sheโ€™d be willing to take the coronavirus vaccine once it became available.

โ€œWell, I think thatโ€™s going to be an issue for all of us,โ€ Harris responded. โ€œI will say that I would not trust Donald Trump.โ€ A month later, at the vice presidential debate, Harris was if anything more emphatic on the subject. โ€œIf Donald Trump tells us we should takeโ€ the vaccine, she declared, โ€œIโ€™m not going to take it.โ€

Kamala Harris has, of course, since changed her mind. Sheโ€™s no longer skeptical of the vaccine, nor does she tolerate the skepticism of others. Instead, sheโ€™s an enthusiastic participant in COVID theater.

Just today, Harris and her husband made a point of kissing each other in front of photographers while wearing masks. They did this despite the fact theyโ€™re married, that they live together, that they were standing outside at the time and despite the fact that they both have been vaccinated.

It doesnโ€™t make you laugh. It makes you nervous. Why are they talking to you that way? Why are they giving you the finger on TV? No matter how many fingers they give you, it doesnโ€™t change what remains true for the country:

If American citizens are going to be forced to take this vaccine or any other medicine, they have an absolute right to know what the effects of it might be. And they have an absolute right to ask that question. Without being silenced or censored or mocked or given the finger. No amount of happy talk or coercion or appeals to false patriotism can change that. Period.

End of transcript

Paul Rossi and Jordan Peterson – a MUST LISTEN interview for all parents @JennyHatch

I have been watching this interview off and on all day. At times I found myself weeping right along with the two men who are talking about what they have given up for speaking up and making their voices heard.

Jenny Marie Hatch

Here is a clip from the interview describing the student/teacher controversial discussion about self care that started everything for Paul:

Click to Watch!

Paul’s letter –

I Refuse to Stand By While My Students Are Indoctrinated

Children are afraid to challenge the repressive ideology that rules our school. Thatโ€™s why I am.

I am a teacher at Grace Church High School in Manhattan. Ten years ago, I changed careers when I discovered how rewarding it is to help young people explore the truth and beauty of mathematics. I love my work.

As a teacher, my first obligation is to my students. But right now, my school is asking me to embrace โ€œantiracismโ€ training and pedagogy that I believe is deeply harmful to them and to any person who seeks to nurture the virtues of curiosity, empathy and understanding.   

โ€œAntiracistโ€ training sounds righteous, but it is the opposite of truth in advertising. It requires teachers like myself to treat students differently on the basis of race. Furthermore, in order to maintain a united front for our students, teachers at Grace are directed to confine our doubts about this pedagogical framework to conversations with an in-house โ€œOffice of Community Engagementโ€ for whom every significant objection leads to a foregone conclusion. Any doubting students are likewise โ€œchallengedโ€ to reframe their views to conform to this orthodoxy. 

I know that by attaching my name to this Iโ€™m risking not only my current job but my career as an educator, since most schools, both public and private, are now captive to this backward ideology. But witnessing the harmful impact it has on children, I canโ€™t stay silent.  


My school, like so many others, induces students via shame and sophistry to identify primarily with their race before their individual identities are fully formed. Students are pressured to conform their opinions to those broadly associated with their race and gender and to minimize or dismiss individual experiences that donโ€™t match those assumptions. The morally compromised status of โ€œoppressorโ€ is assigned to one group of students based on their immutable characteristics. In the meantime, dependency, resentment and moral superiority are cultivated in students considered โ€œoppressed.โ€

All of this is done in the name of โ€œequity,โ€ but it is the opposite of fair. In reality, all of this reinforces the worst impulses we have as human beings: our tendency toward tribalism and sectarianism that a truly liberal education is meant to transcend.

Recently, I raised questions about this ideology at a mandatory, whites-only student and faculty Zoom meeting. (Such racially segregated sessions are now commonplace at my school.) It was a bait-and-switch โ€œself-careโ€ seminar that labelled โ€œobjectivity,โ€ โ€œindividualism,โ€ โ€œfear of open conflict,โ€ and even โ€œa right to comfortโ€ as characteristics of white supremacy. I doubted that these human attributes โ€” many of them virtues reframed as vices โ€” should be racialized in this way. In the Zoom chat, I also questioned whether one must define oneself in terms of a racial identity at all. My goal was to model for students that they should feel safe to question ideological assertions if they felt moved to do so. 

It seemed like my questions broke the ice. Students and even a few teachers offered a broad range of questions and observations. Many students said it was a more productive and substantive discussion than they expected.

However, when my questions were shared outside this forum, violating the school norm of confidentiality, I was informed by the head of the high school that my philosophical challenges had caused โ€œharmโ€ to students, given that these topics were โ€œlife and death matters, about peopleโ€™s flesh and blood and bone.โ€ I was reprimanded for โ€œacting like an independent agent of a set of principles or ideas or beliefs.โ€ And I was told that by doing so, I failed to serve the โ€œgreater good and the higher truth.โ€ 

He further informed me that I had created โ€œdissonance for vulnerable and unformed thinkersโ€ and โ€œneurological disturbance in studentsโ€™ beings and systems.โ€ The schoolโ€™s director of studies added that my remarks could even constitute harassment.

A few days later, the head of school ordered all high school advisors to read a public reprimand of my conduct out loud to every student in the school. It was a surreal experience, walking the halls alone and hearing the words emitting from each classroom: โ€œEvents from last week compel us to underscore some aspects of our mission and share some thoughts about our community,โ€ the statement began. โ€œAt independent schools, with their history of predominantly white populations, racism colludes with other forms of bias (sexism, classism, ableism and so much more) to undermine our stated ideals, and we must work hard to undo this history.โ€

Students from low-income families experience culture shock at our school. Racist incidents happen. And bias can influence relationships. All true. But addressing such problems with a call to โ€œundo historyโ€ lacks any kind of limiting principle and pairs any allegation of bigotry with a priori guilt. My own contract for next year requires me to โ€œparticipate in restorative practices designed by the Office of Community Engagementโ€ in order to โ€œheal my relationship with the students of color and other students in my classes.โ€ The details of these practices remain unspecified until I agree to sign.


I asked my uncomfortable questions in the โ€œself-careโ€ meeting because I felt a duty to my students. I wanted to be a voice for the many students of different backgrounds who have approached me over the course of the past several years to express their frustration with indoctrination at our school, but are afraid to speak up. 

They report that, in their classes and other discussions, they must never challenge any of the premises of our โ€œantiracistโ€ teachings, which are deeply informed by Critical Race Theory. These concerns are confirmed for me when I attend grade-level and all-school meetings about race or gender issues. There, I witness student after student sticking to a narrow script of acceptable responses. Teachers praise insights when they articulate the existing framework or expand it to apply to novel domains. Meantime, it is common for teachers to exhort students who remain silent that โ€œwe really need to hear from you.โ€ 

But what does speaking up mean in a context in which white students are asked to interrogate their โ€œwhite saviorism,โ€ but also โ€œnot make their antiracist practice about themโ€? We are compelling them to tiptoe through a minefield of double-binds. According to the schoolโ€™s own standard for discursive violence, this constitutes abuse. 

Every student at the school must also sign a โ€œStudent Life Agreement,โ€ which requires them to aver that โ€œthe world as we understand it can be hard and extremely biased,โ€ that they commit to โ€œrecognize and acknowledge their biases when we come to school, and interrupt those biases,โ€ and accept that they will be โ€œheld accountable should they fall short of the agreement.โ€ A recent faculty email chain received enthusiastic support for recommending that we โ€œโ€˜officiallyโ€™ flag studentsโ€ who appear โ€œresistantโ€ to the โ€œculture we are trying to establish.โ€ 

When I questioned what form this resistance takes, examples presented by a colleague included โ€œpersisting with a colorblind ideology,โ€ โ€œsuggesting that we treat everyone with respect,โ€ โ€œa belief in meritocracy,โ€ and โ€œjust silence.โ€ In a special assembly in February 2019, our head of school said that the impact of words and images perceived as racist โ€” regardless of intent โ€” is akin to โ€œusing a gun or a knife to kill or injure someone.โ€ 

Imagine being a young person in this environment. Would you risk voicing your doubts, especially if you had never heard a single teacher question it?

Last fall, juniors and seniors in my Art of Persuasion class expressed dismay with the โ€œGrace bubbleโ€ and sought to engage with a wider range of political viewpoints. Since the BLM protests often came up in our discussions, I thought of assigning Glenn Loury, a Brown University professor and public intellectual whose writings express a nuanced, center-right position on racial issues in America. Unfortunately, my administration put the kibosh on my proposal.

The head of the high school responded to me that โ€œpeople like Louryโ€™s lived experienceโ€”and therefore his derived social philosophyโ€ made him an exception to the rule that black thinkers acknowledge structural racism as the paramount impediment in society. He added that โ€œthe moment we are in institutionally and culturally, does not lend itself to dispassionate discussion and debate,โ€ and discussing Louryโ€™s ideas would โ€œonly confuse and/or enflame students, both those in the class and others that hear about it outside of the class.โ€ He preferred I assign โ€œmainstream white conservatives,โ€ effectively denying black students the opportunity to hear from a black professor who holds views that diverge from the orthodoxy pushed on them.

I find it self-evidently racist to filter the dissemination of an idea based on the race of the person who espouses it. I find the claim that exposing 11th and 12th graders to diverse views on an important societal issue will only โ€œconfuseโ€ them to be characteristic of a fundamentalist religion, not an educational philosophy. 

My administration says that these constraints on discourse are necessary to shield students from harm. But it is clear to me that these constraints serve primarily to shield their ideology from harm โ€” at the cost of studentsโ€™ psychological and intellectual development. 

It was out of concern for my students that I spoke out in the โ€œself-careโ€ meeting, and it is out of that same concern that I write today. I am concerned for students who crave a broader range of viewpoints in class. I am concerned for students trained in โ€œrace explicitโ€ seminars to accept some opinions as gospel, while discarding as immoral disconfirming evidence. I am concerned for the dozens of students during my time at Grace who shared with me that they have been reproached by teachers for expressing views that are not aligned with the new ideology.

One current student paid me a visit a few weeks ago. He tapped faintly on my office door, anxiously looking both ways before entering. He said he had come to offer me words of support for speaking up at the meeting. 

I thanked him for his comments, but asked him why he seemed so nervous. He told me he was worried that a particular teacher might notice this visit and โ€œit would mean that I would get in trouble.โ€ He reported to me that this teacher once gave him a lengthy โ€œtalking toโ€ for voicing a conservative opinion in class. He then remembered with a sigh of relief that this teacher was absent that day. I looked him in the eyes. I told him he was a brave young man for coming to see me, and that he should be proud of that. 

Then I sent him on his way. And I resolved to write this piece.


CORRECTION: The anecdote about Glenn Loury was originally attributed to the head of Grace Church School. In fact, those statements were made by the head of the high school. Apologies for the error. 


I am extremely proud to publish this piece by Paul Rossi. If you are a teacher who finds yourself in a similar situation; if you want to speak out but are afraid to risk your job; if you believe that political indoctrination has no place in schools, Paul would love to hear from you. 

Write to him at: teachingfortruth@gmail.com

More from Dr. Peterson below…

Stop the Genocide @JennyHatch

https://www.instagram.com/p/COcCM6nhKuh/?igshid=8wtxgxjl66nt

https://www.instagram.com/p/COb_hQ9hiEj/?igshid=erj8adacnq4a

https://www.instagram.com/p/COZJN1nhcfp/?igshid=1swcibo3mvz5a

Jenny Marie Hatch

Comment by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The UKCOLUMN has published two interviews with whistleblowers from within the UKโ€™s NHS (National Health Services).

On April 14th they interviewed a nurse whistleblowerwho referred to the experimental COVID injections as โ€œgenocide,โ€ and her interview prompted a Senior NHS Board member to come out also and warn the public, in an interview with Brian Gerrish.

She agreed with the nurse who came forward that โ€œgenocideโ€ is the proper word to describe what they were seeing with the adverse reactions to the experimental COVID injections.

If I had a magic wand, it would just stop. It would stop now, before we hurt anybody else. That would be amazing.

That would be the best day ever, because every day I wake up, I think about how I can find that golden nugget to try and wake up the people around me to the damage we are causing.

We are causing โ€” I mean, we heard the word โ€˜genocideโ€™ from the lady on Wednesday. I donโ€™t disagree with that statement. And itโ€™s terrifying, and it saddens me, and the reason Iโ€™m staying where I am for now is to try and make a difference in whatever way I can.

Brian Gerrish then asks her:

And one thing thatโ€™s come into my mind while you were talking there, so just allow me one very last one: what advice, or what would you say to your NHS colleagues, to encourage them to think about whatโ€™s going on?

She replied:

Honestly, what comes to mind is, โ€œYour children are next.โ€ And that is terrifying, and it makes me well up when I think about it.

So if you wonโ€™t speak up because youโ€™ve had the vaccine, or you wonโ€™t speak up because youโ€™re scared (I understand that), or you wonโ€™t speak up because you donโ€™t want to lose your job (and I totally understand that), just know that this doesnโ€™t stop until we all stand up and say, โ€œStop.โ€

And weโ€™re getting younger and younger here now, and our timeโ€™s running out.

Listen to the interview and read the transcript at The UKCOLUMN.

The video is currently on the Vimeo platform which has been known to censor anything negative regarding vaccines, so we have copies on our Rumble and Bitchute Channels as well.

Pfizer and BioNTech Apply for Emergency Use to Inject 12 to 15 Year Olds with their mRNA Experimental ShotsJust days after this interview with the Senior NHS Board member, it was announced that Pfizer had applied for emergency use authorization with both the FDA in the U.S., and the EMA in Europe, to inject 12 to 15 year olds with their experimental COVID mRNA shots.FiercePharma reported:The European Medicines Agency (EMA) started an โ€œaccelerated assessmentโ€ of Pfizer and BioNTechโ€™s COVID-19 vaccine, known as Comirnaty, for people aged 12 to 15.The EMA said its recommendation could come in Juneโ€”unless additional information is neededโ€”and would apply to all member states, pending the European Commissionโ€™s final consent.The FDA is expected to authorize Pfizerโ€™s COVID-19 vaccine, which it created alongside BioNTech, for adolescents 12 to 15 years old by early next week, The New York Times reports, citing federal officials.The agencyโ€™s endorsement would be an amendment to Pfizerโ€™s existing emergency use authorization, and the CDCโ€™s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) would likely meet the following day to examine the clinical trial data. (Source.)FiercePharma also announced today that Pfizer has made $3.5 BILLION so far this year for their experimental COVID mRNA shots, and is projected to make $26 BILLION by the end of the year.In the first three months of 2021, Pfizerโ€™s COVID-19 vaccine pulled in as much revenue as some pharma blockbusters make in an entire year. Thatโ€™s just the beginning, as Pfizer eyes sales from more than a billion additional doses before the end of 2021.The mRNA-based shot Comirnatyโ€”first to market in the U.S.โ€”reeled in $3.5 billion globally in the first quarter, Pfizer said (PDF) in its earnings report. For the full year, Pfizer projects a whopping $26 billion in Comirnaty sales, based on the 1.6 million doses the company has pledged worldwide.Meanwhile, Pfizer now has a full FDA approval in its sights. (Full article.)Are the Europeans and the U.S. citizens going to allow this to happen? Many have voluntarily accepted the injections for themselves, but will they now sacrifice their children on the altar of pharmakeia?Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter.If you say, โ€œBut we knew nothing about this,โ€ does not he who weighs the heart perceive it? Does not he who guards your life know it? Will he not repay each person according to what he has done? (Proverbs 24:11-12)Comment on this article at HealthImpactNews.com.

Gaps in Vaccine Reporting System @JennyHatch

NBC News is reporting…

“But other potentially dangerous, unanticipated reactions to vaccines may not be so obvious in VAERS, a system that is believed to miss many potential side effects โ€” or in the nationโ€™s additional monitoring systems, including the Vaccine Safety Datalink and the CDCโ€™s new phone-based tracking program, v-safe.

โ€œItโ€™s quite a hodgepodge of different systems of collecting data,โ€ said Dr. Katherine Yih, a biologist and epidemiologist who specializes in vaccine surveillance at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care. โ€œItโ€™s worth stating that itโ€™s not as good as it could be.โ€

…

โ€œThere is no single person in charge,โ€ he said. โ€œYou need to have somebody in charge.โ€

Biden administration officials have praised the nationโ€™s vaccine monitoring system, pointing out that it flagged the Johnson & Johnson problems within weeks of the vaccineโ€™s rollout. Federal officials paused distribution to assess additional cases and next steps. They were helped by the fact that European regulators had found similar problems in another vaccine.”

https://twitter.com/brothrstrawbrry/status/1389022751780970499?s=20

Halt Covid Vaccine, Prominent Scientist Tells CDC

Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D.

And finally, more scientists pleading for the rollout to stop.

Toxicologist Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D., calls on ACIP to halt Covid vaccine, citing fertility and blood clotting concerns. Photo of Moderna vaccine vial courtesy of Ian Hutchinson. | Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D.

In a public comment to the CDC, molecular biologist and toxicologist Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D., called to immediately halt Covid vaccine production and distribution. Citing fertility, blood-clotting concerns (coagulopathy), and immune escape, Dr. Lindsay explained to the committee the scientific evidence showing that the coronavirus vaccines are not safe.

On April 23, 2021, the CDCโ€™s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices held a meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. The focus of this ACIP meeting was blood clotting disorders following Covid vaccines. Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay spoke to the CDC during the time set aside for public comment. 

The censorship on social media in particular and the internet in general is relentless. Here is a slightly edited, annotated censorship-proof transcript of Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsayโ€™s 3-minute comment.  

You can listen to her testimony on YouTube here (for now, anyway. If this link goes viral, YouTube will likely censor it).

Molecular Biologist and Toxicologist Calls to Halt Covid Vaccine

Hi, my name is Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay. I hold a doctorate in biochemistry and molecular biology from the University of Texas, and have over 30 years of scientific experience, primarily in toxicology and mechanistic biology. 

In the mid-1990s, I aided the development of a temporary human contraceptive vaccine which ended up causing unintended autoimmune ovarian destruction and sterility in animal test models. Despite efforts against this and sequence analyses that did not predict this. 

I strongly feel that all the gene therapy vaccines must be halted immediately due to safety concerns on several fronts.

Janci Chunn Lindsay: Covid vaccines could induce cross-reactive antibodies to syncytin, and impair fertility as well as pregnancy outcomes

First, there is a credible reason to believe that the Covid vaccines will cross-react with the syncytin and reproductive proteins in sperm, ova, and placenta, leading to impaired fertility and impaired reproductive and gestational outcomes. 

Respected virologist Dr. Bill Gallaher, Ph.D., made excellent arguments as to why you would expect cross reaction. Due to beta sheet conformation similarities between spike proteins and syncytin-1 and syncytin-2. 

I have yet to see a single immunological study which disproves this. Despite the fact that it would literally take the manufacturers a single day to do these syncytin studies to ascertain this [once they had serum from vaccinated individuals]. Itโ€™s been over a year since the assertions were first made that this [the body attacking its own syncytin proteins due to similarity in spike protein structure] could occur. 

Pregnancy losses reported to VAERS lead to demand to halt Covid vaccine

We have seen 100 pregnancy losses reported in VAERS as of April 9th. And there have [also] been reports of impaired spermatogenesis and placental findings from both the natural infection, vaccinated, and syncytin knockout animal models that have similar placental pathology, implicating a syncytin-mediated role in these outcomes. 

Additionally, we have heard of multiple reports of menses irregularities in those vaccinated. These must be investigated. 

We simply cannot put these [vaccines] in our children who are at .002% risk for Covid mortality, if infected, or any more of the child-bearing age population without thoroughly investigating this matter.

[If we do], we could potentially sterilize an entire generation. Speculation that this will not occur and a few anecdotal reports of pregnancies within the trial are not sufficient proof that this is not impacting on a population-wide scale. 

Covid vaccine causes blood disorders

Secondly, all of the gene therapies [Covid vaccines] are causing coagulopathy. [Coagulopathy when the bodyโ€™s blood clotting system is impaired.] This is not isolated to one manufacturer. And this is not isolated to one age group. 

As we are seeing coagulopathy deaths in healthy young adults with no secondary comorbidities. 

There have been 795 reports related to blood clotting disorders as of April 9th in the VAERS reporting system, 338 of these being due to thrombocytopenia.

There are forward and backward mechanistic principles for why this is happening. The natural infection is known to cause coagulopathy due to the spike protein. All gene therapy vaccines direct the body to make the spike protein. Zhang et al in [a scientific paper published in the Journal of Hematology & Oncology] in September 2020 showed that if you infuse spike protein into mice that have humanized ACE-2 receptors on blood platelets that you also get disseminated thrombosis. 

Spike protein incubated with human blood in vitro also caused blood clot development which was resistant to fibrinolysis. [Fibrinolysis is the bodyโ€™s process of breaking down blood clots]. The spike protein is causing thrombocytic events, which cannot be resolved through natural means. And all vaccines must be halted in the hope that they can be reformulated to guard against this adverse effect. 

Third, there is strong evidence for immune escapeโ€”

At this point in her oral testimony, Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay was interrupted by a manโ€™s voice: โ€œThank you for your comment, your time has expired.โ€

I reached out to Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay to find out what else she had wanted to share with ACIP, in addition to her concerns over fertility and blood-clotting disorders. She sent me back her third point, which she submitted as written testimony.

Third, there is strong evidence for immune escape, and that inoculation under pandemic pressure with these leaky vaccines is driving the creation of more lethal mutants that are both newly infecting a younger age demographic, and causing more Covid-related deaths across the population than would have occurred without intervention. That is, there is evidence that the vaccines are making the pandemic worse.

It is clear that we are seeing a temporal immune depression immediately following the inoculations [see World Meter Global Covid deaths counts following inoculation dates] and there are immunosuppressive regions on spike proteins, as well as Syn-2, that could be likely causing this, through a T-cell mediated mechanism. If we do not stop this vaccine campaign until these issues can be investigated, we may see a phenomenon such as we see in chickens with Marekโ€™s disease.

We have enough evidence now to see a clear correlation with increased Covid deaths and the vaccine campaigns. This is not a coincidence. It is an unfortunate unintended effect of the vaccines. We simply must not turn a blind eye and pretend this is not occurring. We must halt all Covid vaccine administration immediately, before we create a true pandemic that we cannot reign in.

MIT scientist also concerned about blood-clotting, fertility issues

Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., an expert in protein synthesis, believes that Dr. Lindsayโ€™s hypothesis is correct. โ€œI absolutely share these concerns,โ€ Dr. Seneff, who is a senior research scientist at MIT, wrote to me in a sobering email. 

โ€œThe potential for blood clotting disorders and the potential for sterilization are only part of the story. There are other potential long-term effects of these vaccines as well, such as autoimmune disease and immune escape, whereby the vaccines administered to immune-compromised people accelerate the mutation rate of the virus so as to render both naturally acquired and vaccine-induced antibodies no longer effective.โ€

Like Dr. Lindsay, Dr. Seneff believes we need to immediately halt Covid vaccine campaigns. โ€œThis massive clinical trial on the general population could have devastating and irreversible effects on a huge number of people,โ€ Seneff explains.

Despite these fertility and blood disorder concerns, the CDC panel voted last Friday to resume the use of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. They did, however, suggest an FDA warning label be added. Their argument against halting Covid vaccination? The CDC believes the benefits outweigh the risks.

Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D., calls on the CDC to halt Covid vaccine administration, citing fertility and blood-clotting concerns. | Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D.About Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay

Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay is the Director of Toxicology and Molecular Biology for Toxicology Support Services, LLC. She holds a doctorate in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from the University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center-Houston. Dr. Lindsay has extensive experience in analyzing the molecular profile of pharmacologic responses. Her expertise centers on evaluating the complex dynamics of toxicity, such as toxicant pharmacology, exposure route, host metabolism, and subsequent cellular effects as they relate to the contribution of specific substances to impairment, health and fertility risk, and human disease.

Related articles:
Can You Still Get Covid After Vaccination?
23 Covid Memes to Make You Laugh, Cry, and Wince
Natural Treatments for Coronavirus

About Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D.

Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D., is an investigative journalist, book author, and Fulbright awardee. She is the author of Your Baby, Your Way: Taking Charge of Your Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Parenting Decisions for a Happier, Healthier Family, co-author (with Paul Thomas, M.D.) of The Vaccine-Friendly Plan, and The Addiction Spectrum: A Compassionate, Holistic Approach to Recovery. Follow her on Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest.